Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Optimization of a Reducible Structure

As discussed earlier, the application of such techniques should be restricted until later in the design when the full heat-integration context both within and outside the disjtillation system has been established. [Pg.155]


Figure S.19 The approach based on optimization of a reducible structure starts with the most general configuration and simplifies. (From Eliceche and Sargent, IChemE Symp. Series No. 61 1, 1981 reproduced by permission of the Institution of Chemical Engineers... Figure S.19 The approach based on optimization of a reducible structure starts with the most general configuration and simplifies. (From Eliceche and Sargent, IChemE Symp. Series No. 61 1, 1981 reproduced by permission of the Institution of Chemical Engineers...
Heat Exchanger Network Design Based on the Optimization of a Reducible Structure... [Pg.394]

For more complex network designs, especially those involving many constraints, mixed equipment specifications, etc., design methods based on the optimization of a reducible structure can be used. [Pg.397]

The A-representability constraints presented in this chapter can also be applied to computational methods based on the variational optimization of the reduced density matrix subject to necessary conditions for A-representability. Because of their hierarchical structure, the (g, R) conditions are also directly applicable to computational approaches based on the contracted Schrodinger equation. For example, consider the (2, 4) contracted Schrodinger equation. Requiring that the reconstmcted 4-matrix in the (2, 4) contracted Schrodinger equation satisfies the (4, 4) conditions is sufficient to ensure that the 2-matrix satisfies the rather stringent (2, 4) conditions. Conversely, if the 2-matrix does not satisfy the (2, 4) conditions, then it is impossible to construct a 4-matrix that is consistent with this 2-matrix and also satisfies the (4, 4) conditions. It seems that the (g, R) conditions provide important constraints for maintaining consistency at different levels of the contracted Schrodinger equation hierarchy. [Pg.479]

Optimizing complete match workflows is so far an open challenge, especially since most match systems prescribe workflows of a fixed structure, e.g., regarding which matchers can be executed sequentially or in parallel. As discussed in Sect. 3.1, (Peukert et al. 2010a) propose a first approach for tuning match workflows focusing on reducing the search space for improved efficiency. [Pg.16]

Shape optimization of microfluidic structures is a challenging problem, where MOR is strongly desired to reduce the computational complexity during iterations. Utilization of reduced order models for shape optimization in microfluidic devices has been explored recently. Antil et al. [15] combined the POD and the balanced truncation MOR methods for shape optimization of capillary barriers in a network of microchannels. Ooi [9] developed a computationally efficient SVM surrogate model for optimization of a bioMEM microfluidic weir to enhance particle trapping. [Pg.2282]

If an optimization is required to retain the symmetry of a structure, then symmetry-equivalent parameters must remain equal. Thus only displacements belonging to the totally symmetric irreducible representation are permitted other displacements are forbidden since they would change the symmetry. If it can be determined (e.g. from the Stanton-Mciver symmetry rules) that the transition vector does not belong to the totally symmetric representation, then the position of the transition structure along the reaction path is fixed by symmetry, and only the coordinates perpendicular to the reaction path need to be optimized. Since a transition structure must be a minimum with respect to all displacements other than along the reaction path, optimization of the transition structures is reduced to a simple minimization. [Pg.254]

To perform the robust optimum design, the OF mean and standard deviation are numerically evaluated with a new procedure based on a Lyapunov type equation. Robustness is formulated as a multiobjective optimization problem, in which both the mean and the standard deviation of the deterministic OF are minimized. The results show a significant improvement in performance control and OF real values dispersion limitation if compared with standard conventional solutions. Some interesting conclusions can be reached with reference to the results obtained for the adopted examples. With reference to TMD efficiency in vibration reduction, the real structural performance obtained by using conventional optimization has a reduced efficiency compared to those obtained when system uncertainty parameters is properly considered. With reference to the obtained robust solutions, it can be noted that they can control and limit final OF dispersion by limiting its standard deviation. Moreover, this goal is achieved by finding optimal solutions in terms of DV that induce an increase in OF mean value. [Pg.544]

Geometry optimizations of the reduced copper complexes (Table 2) are more complicated, because the lower charge on the copper ion leads to weaker bonds that are very sensitive to electrostatic factors and hydrogen bonds. The optimized structure of Cu(imidazole)2(SCH3)(S(CH3)2) without symmetry is more tetrahedral than the crystal structure of reduced plasto-cyanin and has too short a Cu-Smbi bond length (237 pm). However, if the Cu-Swet bond is fixed to the experimental value (290 pm) and the geometry is reoptimized, a structure is obtained that closely resembles the crystal structure. Moreover, this structure is only 4 kJ mol" less stable than the fully optimized one. i.e., well within the error limits of the method, so it is impossible to decide whether the reduced structure in... [Pg.2258]


See other pages where Optimization of a Reducible Structure is mentioned: [Pg.155]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.387]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.382]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.1363]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.575]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.268]    [Pg.508]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.247]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.550]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.550]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.782]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.344]   


SEARCH



A-optimal

A-optimality

Optimal structure

Optimization structural

Optimization structure

Optimized structure

Optimizing Structures

© 2024 chempedia.info