Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Structure transition

Transition structures can be dehned by nuclear symmetry. For example, a symmetric Spj2 reaction will have a transition structure that has a higher symmetry than that of the reactants or products. Furthermore, the transition structure is the lowest-energy structure that obeys the constraints of higher symmetry. Thus, the transition structure can be calculated by forcing the molecule to have a particular symmetry and using a geometry optimization technique. [Pg.127]

Symmetry in Science Springer-Verlag. New York (1996). [Pg.127]

Davidson, Group Theory for Chemists MacMillan, Hampshire (1991). [Pg.127]

Cotton, Chemical Applications of Group Theory John Wiley and Sons, New York (1990). [Pg.127]

Ferraro, J. S. Ziomek, Introductory Group Theory Plenum, New York (1975). [Pg.127]

The situation shown in Fig. 3.3a is the common one the higher-energy transition structure leads to the higher-energy product, and the better orbital interaction matches it. However, there are some situations where this is not so, where there is a crossing of the curves (Fig. 3.3b). Some of the most interesting mechanistic problems arise when the more exothermic reaction is not the faster—in other words, when [Pg.135]

The optimization facility can be used to locate transition structures as well as ground states structures since both correspond to stationary points on the potential energy-surface. However, finding a desired transition structure directly by specifying u reasonable guess for its geometry can be chaUenging in many cases. [Pg.46]

Gaussian includes a facility for automatically generating a starting structure for a transition state optimization based upon the reactants and products that the transition structure connects, known as the STQN method. This feature is requested with the QST2 option to the Opt keyword. Input files using this option will include two title and molecule specification sections. The facility generates a guess for the transition structure which is midway between the reactants and products, in terms of redundant internal coordinates. [Pg.46]

Here is the input file for an optimization of the transition structure for the reaction H3CO —t H2COH (a simple 1,2 hydrogen shift reaction). We specify a UHF calculation (open shell) since the molecular system is a doublet  [Pg.46]

The STQN facility requires that corresponding atoms appear in the same order within the two molecule specifications (although it does not matter whether the reactants 01 the products appear first). The bonding in the two structures does not need to be the same, however. [Pg.46]

Exploring Chemistry with Electronic Structure Methods [Pg.46]

Imagine two molecules combining with each other in a simple, one-step, exothermic reaction leading to two possible products A and B (Fig. 3.1a). Chemists have long appreciated that the more exothermic reaction, that leading to the product B, is usually the faster—it has been called the rate-equilibrium relationship, and is related to the reactivity-selectivity principle. The explanation is easy enough—whatever features lead the product B to be lower in energy than the product A will have developed in the transition structure to some extent. Thermodynamics does affect kinetics—a source of endless confusion. [Pg.103]

Transition structure B Transition structure A Curve crossing [Pg.103]


Schlegel H B 1987 Optimization of equilibrium geometries and transition structures Adv. Chem. Phys. 67 249... [Pg.2355]

Bofill J M 1994 Updated Hessian matrix and the restricted step method for locating transition structures J. Comput. Chem. 15 1... [Pg.2356]

McDouall J J W, Robb M A and Bernard F 1986 An efficient algorithm for the approximate location of transition structures in a diabatic surface formalism Chem. Phys. Lett. 129 595... [Pg.2358]

Transition stale search algorithms rather climb up the potential energy surface, unlike geometry optimi/.ation routines where an energy minimum is searched for. The characterization of even a simple reaction potential surface may result in location of more than one transition structure, and is likely to require many more individual calculations than are necessary to obtain et nilibrinm geometries for either reactant or product. [Pg.17]

Calculated transition structures may be very sensitive Lo the level of theory employed. Semi-empirical methods, since they are parametrized for energy miriimnm structures, may be less appropriate for transition state searching than ab initio methods are. Transition structures are norm ally characterized by weak partial" bonds, that is, being broken or formed. In these cases UHF calculations arc necessary, and sometimes even the inclusion of electron correlation effects. [Pg.17]

The success of simple theoretical models m determining the properties of stable molecules may not carry over into reaction pathways. Therefore, ah initio calcii lation s with larger basis sets ni ay be more successful in locatin g transition structures th an semi-empir-ical methods, or even methods using minimal or small basis sets. [Pg.307]

The bond orders obtained from Mayer s formula often seem intuitively reasonable, as illustrated in Table 2.6 for some simple molecules. The method has also been used to compute the bond orders for intermediate structures in reactions of the form H -1- XH HX -1- H and X I- XH -H H (X = F, Cl, Br). The results suggested that bond orders were a useful way to describe the similarity of the transition structure to the reactants or to the products. Moreover, the bond orders were approximately conserved along the reaction pathway. [Pg.103]

Schematic representation of some of the lower frequencies in the ion-dipole complex for the Cl + MeCl m and the imaginary frequency of the transition structure, calculated using a 6-31G basis set. [Pg.300]

A steepest descents minimisation algorithm produces a path that oscillates about the true reaction pathway Ihe transition structure to a minimum. [Pg.304]

Transition Structures and Reaction Pathways for Large Systems... [Pg.305]

Fig. 5.35 Geometry predicted by CASSCF ab initio calculations of the two possible transition structure geometries for the Diels-Alder reaction between ethene and butadiene. (Figure adapted from Houk KN, J Gonzalez and Y Li 1995. Pericyclic Reaction Transition States Passions and Punctilios 1935-1995. Accounts of Chemical Research 28 81-90.)... Fig. 5.35 Geometry predicted by CASSCF ab initio calculations of the two possible transition structure geometries for the Diels-Alder reaction between ethene and butadiene. (Figure adapted from Houk KN, J Gonzalez and Y Li 1995. Pericyclic Reaction Transition States Passions and Punctilios 1935-1995. Accounts of Chemical Research 28 81-90.)...
Transition structures for the enol boronoate/aldehyde reaction. [Pg.627]


See other pages where Structure transition is mentioned: [Pg.2349]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.67]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.307]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.182]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.297]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.300]    [Pg.301]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.309]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.626]    [Pg.627]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.307 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.307 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.16 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.78 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.254 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.272 , Pg.478 , Pg.517 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.46 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.255 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.793 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.226 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info