Operational risk management purpose

In addition, I said that the generic base of the practice of safety is hazards, and that if there are no hazards, there would be no reason for safety professionals to exist. It was also said that the ultimate goal for what we propose is to achieve acceptable risk levels. In time, we will more than likely be considering an umbrella term that encompasses all aspects of the practice of safety. Operational Risk Management would serve very well for that purpose. 

To minimize the potential for the occurrence of low-probability/high consequence incidents, the operations risk management system should include a distinctly identified activity designed for that purpose—if the inherent risks in an operation indicate that it is needed. 

In Chapter 25, Measurement of Safety Performance, it is said that precise and certain measures of safety, health, and environmental performance are difficult to obtain. Nevertheless, audits can be highly effective measures of the quality of operational risk management in place if they are well conceived and well done. It is suggested that the observation made by Kase and Wiese (1990) concerning the purpose of a safety audit be kept in mind ... 

This Concept Series book supports several of the twelve elements of process safety enunciated in Guidelines for the Technical Management of Chemical Process Safety, including process knowledge and documentation, process risk management and enhancement of process safety knowledge. The purpose of the book is to assist designers and operators of chemical facilities to understand and reduce potential hazards associated with static electricity. 

A good transportation risk management system includes periodic audits of the management system, its technical elements, and compliance across the supply chain. The purpose of an audit program is to provide feedback on transportation risk management efforts to improve or enhance current operations such as determining ... 

A reasonable definition of hazard for the purposes of CRM is also provided in ISO/IEC Guide 51 1999 as a potential source of harm . One may decide to add ... to a patient to that definition to clarify that harm to a system s operators or those delivering healthcare is generally excluded. Interestingly there are other definitions of hazard which imply something which is inevitable and cannot in any way be avoided. This clearly flies in the face of risk management and such a definition would presumably preclude the existence of controls. Hazards are therefore entities which may or may not in the real world result in actual harm but certainly have the opportunity to do so should they fail to be adequately controlled. 

The purpose of this study is to answer following question can the LARA method be used as a holistic risk management technique in different academic environments and what are the main differences when comparing to the results obtained by industrial risk analysis techniques In order to answer these questions, risk analyses of different procedures were performed using LARA, Failure Mode, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA), and HAZOP. The experiments andyzed are standard operations performed at University of Pardubice and at EPFL. The main differences of the results using the different methods will be pointed out and compared. 

Since the top event FuBI could be difficultly understandable by risk managers or surveillance Authorities, a crisp interval is derived by applying a defuzzification operator to the TE fuzzy lower and upper bounds. For this purpose, the Center of Area (COA) method is applied (Bojadziev Bojadziev 1995). 

The purpose of the Risk Management Process is to identify, analyze, and monitor the risks of the system. The Risk Management Process is a continuous process for systematically addressing risk throughout the life cycle of a system product, process, or service. It can be applied to risks related to the acquisition, development, maintenance, or operation of a system. 

The computerized systems, both hardware and software, that form part of the GLP study should comply with the requirements of the principles of GLP. This relates to the development, validation, operation and maintenance of the system. Validation means that tests have been carried out to demonstrate that the system is fit for its intended purpose. Like any other validation, this will be the use of objective evidence to confirm that the pre-set requirements for the system have been met. There will be a number of different types of computer system, ranging from personal computers and programmable analytical instruments to a laboratory information management system (LIMS). The extent of validation depends on the impact the system has on product quality, safety and record integrity. A risk-based approach can be used to assess the extent of validation required, focusing effort on critical areas. A computerized analytical system in a QC laboratory requires full validation (equipment qualification) with clear boundaries set on its range of operation because this has a high... 

---