Observation scientific

The model of aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) in Figure 1.8 is an example of a scientific model. A scientific model is a thinking device that helps you understand and explain macroscopic observations. Scientific models are built on experimentation. In Greece, a model of matter based on atoms was discussed about 2500 years ago, but this model was not a scientific model because it was never supported by experiments. It took until the 1800s before a scientific model of matter was proposed. This atomic model was developed and verified by experiments. It has withstood 200 years of prediction and experimentation with only slight modifications. 

New art includes a photo of a nurse making observations (scientific method) in the hospital, and a plastic strip thermometer placed on a baby s forehead to determine body temperature. 

The Ag (100) surface is of special scientific interest, since it reveals an order-disorder phase transition which is predicted to be second order, similar to tire two dimensional Ising model in magnetism [37]. In fact, tire steep intensity increase observed for potentials positive to - 0.76 V against Ag/AgCl for tire (1,0) reflection, which is forbidden by symmetry for tire clean Ag(lOO) surface, can be associated witli tire development of an ordered (V2 x V2)R45°-Br lattice, where tire bromine is located in tire fourfold hollow sites of tire underlying fee (100) surface tills stmcture is depicted in tlie lower right inset in figure C2.10.1 [15]. 

Chemistry, like any scientific discipline, relies heavily on experimental observations, and therefore on data. Until a few years ago, the usual way to publish information on recent scientific developments was to release it in books or journals. In chemistry, the enormous increase in the number of compounds and the data concerning them resulted in increasingly ineffective data-handling, on the side of the producers as well as the users. One way out of this disaster is the electronic processing, by computer methods, of this huge amount of data available in chemistry. Compared with other scientific disciplines that only use text and numbers for data transfer, chemistry has an additional, special challenge molecules. The molecular species consist of atoms and bonds that hold them together. Moreover, compounds... 

In the first edition of this book I wrote, A major use of the Internet is for electronic mail, but extremely rapid growth is being observed in other areas, particularly the "World-Wide Web" (WWW).... Such a phrase seems an understatement despite the hype, the Internet has certainly made a dramatic impact, not least on the scientific community, where its... 

The scientific method, as mentioned, involves observation and experimentation (research) to discover or establish facts. These are followed by deduction or hypothesis, establishing theories or principles. This sequence, however, may be reversed. The noted twentieth-century philosopher Karl Popper, who also dealt with science, expressed the view that the scientist s work starts not with collection of data (observation) but with selection of a suitable problem (theory). In fact, both of these paths can be involved. vSignificant and sometimes accidental observations can be made without any preconceived idea of a problem or theory and vice versa. The scientist, however, must have a well-prepared, open mind to be able to recognize the significance of such observations and must be able to follow them through. Science always demands rigorous standards of procedure, reproducibility, and open discussion that set reason over irrational belief. 

The scientific method is taught starting in elementary school. The first step in the scientific method is to form a hypothesis. A hypothesis is just an educated guess or logical conclusion from known facts. It is then compared against all available data and its details developed. If the hypothesis is found to be consistent with known facts, it is called a theory and usually published. The characteristics most theories have in common are that they explain observed phenomena, predict the results of future experiments, and can be presented in mathematical form. When a theory is found to be always correct for many years, it is eventually referred to as a scientific law. However useful this process is, we often use constructs that do not fit in the scientific method scheme as it is typically described. 

Adherence to the scientific method is what de fines science The scientific method has four major el ements observation law theory and hypothesis... 

It IS worth remembering that a theory can never be proven correct It can only be proven incor rect incomplete or inadequate Thus theories are always being tested and refined As important as anything else in the scientific method is the testable hypothesis Once a theory is proposed experiments are designed to test its validity If the results are con sistent with the theory our belief in its soundness is strengthened If the results conflict with it the theory IS flawed and must be modified Section 6 7 describes some observations that support the theory that car bocations are intermediates in the addition of hydro gen halides to alkenes... 

Scientific method (Section 6 6) A systematic approach to es tabhshmg new knowledge m which observations lead to laws laws to theories theories to testable hypotheses and hypotheses to expenments... 

Each observation in any branch of scientific investigation is inaccurate to some degree. Often the accurate value for the concentration of some particular constituent in the analyte cannot be determined. However, it is reasonable to assume the accurate value exists, and it is important to estimate the limits between which this value lies. It must be understood that the statistical approach is concerned with the appraisal of experimental design and data. Statistical techniques can neither detect nor evaluate constant errors (bias) the detection and elimination of inaccuracy are analytical problems. Nevertheless, statistical techniques can assist considerably in determining whether or not inaccuracies exist and in indicating when procedural modifications have reduced them. 

Besides being used as a tool for scientific research, siUca aerogels can be the cause for new scientific phenomena. For example, the long-range correlations of the disorder in siUca aerogels are beheved to be responsible for the intriguing observations of the superfluid transitions in He and He and on the ordering of He— He mixtures (75). 

It can be said that science is the art of budding models to explain observations and predict new ones. Chemistry, as the central science, utilizes models ia virtually every aspect of the discipline. From the first week of a first chemistry course, students use the scientific method to develop models which explain the behavior of the elements. Anyone who studies or uses chemistry has, ia fact, practiced some form of molecular modeling. 

Visual Inspection. Visual inspection should always be regarded as the first defense against failure (1). Without scientific proof, it is estimated that 80% of defects are found by visual inspection. A pilot walking around an aircraft, or a mechanic observing a machine in operation often finds defects very quickly. The cost of this inspection is minimal. Human factor considerations are particularly important for the visual inspection process. Although the visual inspection is perhaps the most inexpensive and finds the most defects, the 20% of the defects remaining after the visual inspection must also be found thus the more costly and technically elaborate NDE methods are needed. 

In 1981, Chinese Restaurant Asthma was reported following capsule administration of MSG to several asthmatics (37). However, the researchers failed to account for other allergens to which the subjects could have been exposed and did not utilize the scientific practice of a "control" substance which would have helped to determine if glutamate triggered this response. In a double-blind crossover study, chronic asthmatics were challenged with MSG or a placebo. No decrease in pulmonary function was observed (39). 

Hazard identification involves gathering and evaluating data on the types of health injury or disease that may be produced by a chemical and on the conditions of exposure under which injury or disease is produced. It may also involve characterization of the behavior of a chemical within the body and the interactions it undergoes with organs, cells, or even parts of cells. Hazard identification is not risk assessment. It is a scientific determination of whether observed toxic effects in one setting will occur in other settings. 

---