Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Observation matrix

Calculate observer matrix using Ackermann s formula Ke=acker(AEE, AIE, observerpoles)... [Pg.407]

The development of new fiber coatings in the near future should further improve the specificity of SPME and overcome some of the observed matrix effects. Quantification by stable isotope dilution gas chromatography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS) may assist in improving analytical performance. Along with the possible application of micro LC and capillary LC columns to in-tube SPME, the development of novel derivatization methods and the potential for the analysis of fumigant pesticides, SPME appears to be a technique with a future in the analysis of pesticide residues in food. [Pg.732]

C is the mxn observation matrix which indicates the state variables (or linear combinations of state variables) that are measured experimentally. [Pg.12]

The state variables are the minimal set of dependent variables that are needed in order to describe fully the state of the system. The output vector represents normally a subset of the state variables or combinations of them that are measured. For example, if we consider the dynamics of a distillation column, in order to describe the condition of the column at any point in time we need to know the prevailing temperature and concentrations at each tray (the state variables). On the other hand, typically very few variables are measured, e.g., the concentration at the top and bottom of the column, the temperature in a few trays and in some occasions the concentrations at a particular tray where a side stream is taken. In other words, for this case the observation matrix C will have zeros everywhere except in very few locations where there will be 1 s indicating which state variables are being measured. [Pg.12]

In other words, the observation matrix C from the case of a linear output relationship is substituted with the Jacobean matrix (dhT/dx)T in setting up matrix A and vector b. [Pg.93]

With the same reasoning that we applied to Eq. (9-6), we can infer that to have complete observability, the observability matrix 1... [Pg.173]

Similarly, we can use the MATLAB function obsv () for the observability matrix ... [Pg.173]

The remaining task lies in the determination of the control matrix X and observer matrix Z such that the sufficient condition for robust performance, Eq. (22.28), holds. A Lyapunov-based approach is employed to obtain these two matrices. After some lengthy and complicated manipulations of Eq. (22.29) and the control structure shown in Fig. 22.3, the following two Riccati equations are derived, whose positive-definite solutions correspond to the control and observer matrices, X and Z. [Pg.365]

We used the program given in Example 1.6 to calculate the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of X X, where X is the centered observation matrix from the data of Table 1.3. The program output is as follows. [Pg.63]

Another important problem is to reproduce the observation matrix using only the primary factors, i.e., dropping some small terms in (1.113) that likely stem from measurement error. [Pg.66]

Reproduce the observation matrix in Section 1.8.7 using 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively, primary factors. Compute the sum of reproduction error squares for each case. Compare these sums with the following sums 2 + 3 + 4 + 5 3 + M + 5> M + x5 5> respectively. [Pg.67]

In fact, with simple input functions common in pharmacokinetic applications (e.g., impulse or step function), the columns of the observation matrix X created from the integrals in (5.69) tend to be linearly dependent, resulting in ill - conditioned estimation problems. As discussed in the next section, this method is, however, excellent for input identification. [Pg.306]

Blissett et al. (1998) reported that thermal shock effects on the residual flexural properties of the Nicalon /CAS were more evident at intermediate temperature differentials, i.e. AT= 450-600°C, and this was attributed to the observed matrix cracking. [Pg.419]

Andersson et al. have recently proposed a direct injection LC-MS/MS method for the identification and quantification of amphetamine, methamphetamine, MDA, and MDMA in urine drug testing. The samples were prepared for analysis by fivefold dilution with ultra pure water [119]. A gradient elution was performed using two solvents 25 mM formic acid containing 1 % acetonitrile and 25 mM formic acid containing 90 % acetonitrile. Authors observed matrix effects, in terms of ion suppression, about 25-fold. This method was used for real sample analysis and... [Pg.382]

According to IUPAC, the LoD is defined as three times the standard deviation of the mean of the blank determinations added to the mean of the blank measures [12]. The LoD obtained for the PFA procedure (Table 1.3) is 8.2 pgkg-1 Pb. This value is low enough to quantify lead in the vast majority of foodstuffs. This method was successfully applied for various food samples, vegetable and animal tissues. No interferences from other elements have been observed. Matrix effects were seen with some samples, but were eliminated simply by diluting the samples. [Pg.13]

TABLE 7-8. Results of Post-colnnm Infusion Experiments, Showing Time (Minutes) and Extent (-% suppression H-% enhancement) of the Observed Matrix Effects... [Pg.331]

On the framework of the detectability motion given in [5], the Jacobian matrix of ( ) is the observability matrix, and its non-singularity provides the robust partial observability of the reactor motion x(t), with observability index K = 1 and the differential equation in Eq. 6 is the unobservable dynamics whose unique solution is the rmobservable motion (Eq. 3a). [Pg.369]

The correctness of a trial vibrational numbering of electronic state 2 is then indicated by the constancy of the ratio of the observed matrix element to the calculated vibrational overlap. This method is similar to the Franck-Condon method for establishing the absolute vibrational numbering. There, one compares observed transition intensities to sets of Franck-Condon factors calculated for a series of trial numberings. The key to the success of both methods is the existence of at least one relative minimum or maximum among the observed Hi,v,2,v matrix elements or transition intensities. [Pg.294]


See other pages where Observation matrix is mentioned: [Pg.248]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.105]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.315]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.62]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.65]    [Pg.205]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.485]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.295]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.126]    [Pg.328]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.34 , Pg.69 , Pg.81 , Pg.110 , Pg.128 , Pg.166 , Pg.197 ]




SEARCH



Observability matrix

Observability matrix

Observer gain matrix

Structural Observability Matrix

© 2024 chempedia.info