Null hypothesis evaluation

Consider the situation when the accuracy of a new analytical method is evaluated by analyzing a standard reference material with a known )J,. A sample of the standard is analyzed, and the sample s mean is determined. The null hypothesis is that the sample s mean is equal to p. 

The test statistic for evaluating the null hypothesis is called an f-test, and is given as either... 

II the difference approach, which typically utilises 2-sided statistical tests (Hartmann et al., 1998), using either the null hypothesis (H0) or the alternative hypothesis (Hi). The evaluation of the method s bias (trueness) is determined by assessing the 95% confidence intervals (Cl) of the overall average bias compared to the 0% relative bias value (or 100% recovery). If the Cl brackets the 0% bias then the trueness that the method generates acceptable data is accepted, otherwise it is rejected. For precision measurements, if the Cl brackets the maximum RSDp at each concentration level of the validation standards then the method is acceptable. Typically, RSDn> is set at <3% (Bouabidi et al., 2010),... 

In the next step a value for the test is calculated from the data and compared with the tabulated critical value. If the calculated value exceeds the critical value this indicates significance. To finalize the significance test the test statistics have to be evaluated with respect to the Null hypothesis. This enables us to make decisions and to draw conclusions. 

We will focus our attention to the situation of non-inferiority. Within the testing framework the type I error in this case is as before, the false positive (rejecting the null hypothesis when it is true), which now translates into concluding noninferiority when the new treatment is in fact inferior. The type II error is the false negative (failing to reject the null hypothesis when it is false) and this translates into failing to conclude non-inferiority when the new treatment truly is non-inferior. The sample size calculations below relate to the evaluation of noninferiority when using either the confidence interval method or the alternative p-value approach recall these are mathematically the same. 

In Situ Native Standard Method. A fundamental approach to verification of particulate burden in cotton reference materials is under evaluation Q6) based on a null hypothesis. The hypothesis states that upon rendering a cotton free of foreign material, the recoverable particulates-lint ith property constant X-j (for example, color) of the synthesized mixture is equal to that for the in situ particulate constant, -j. The experimental scheme to test the hypothesis is as follows. 

This model was used to test the sigmoidal nature of a data set by testing the null hypothesis m = 0. The data were fit (32) to a complete model in which Pt, T, and m were allowed to vary, and then to a reduced model in which Pt and T were allowed to vary while m was set equal to zero. An F-test evaluation of the increase in the residual sum of squares between the complete and reduced models was used to determine the acceptance of the null hypothesis (33). If the null hypothesis is rejected, the sigmoidal nature of the data set is statistically significant. 

A statistical evaluation of the collected data must be performed for probabilistic sampling designs in order to determine whether there is sufficient evidence from sample data to reject the null hypothesis in favor of the alternative hypothesis. Hypothesis testing proposed in the Step 6 of the DQO process is performed in Step 6 of the DQA process after the data have been collected and their quality made known. Only valid data that are relevant to the intended data use are statistically evaluated in hypothesis testing. The statistical evaluation establishes that these data have been collected in sufficient quantity for the intended use and serves as a justification for additional sampling, if more data are needed in order to reach the decision with a desired level of confidence. 

Confidence intervals (CIs) are usually the preferred means for evaluating chance in epidemiological studies because they are more informative than P values. CIs are the interval (usually 95%) around the risk estimate (which is a point estimate) that represent the upper and lower values of the true risk estimate. CIs provide information on both the precision of the point estimate and statistical significance. Wide confidence intervals indicate that there is a high degree of uncertainty on the accuracy of the point estimate and is usually a result of small study populations. CIs that exclude 1 means that there is a 95% probability that the null hypothesis is not operating. 

In addition to chance, systematic biases can also affect the relationship between an exposure and disease. Biases lead to an incorrect estimate of the relationship between the exposure and disease that is an incorrect measure of the relative risk. Some biases will result in an effect being observed (i.e., statistically significant RR) when there is not a causal relationship, whereas other biases will result in obscuring a causal relationship between exposure and disease (refer to as biasing toward the null hypothesis). In an individual study, biases can be introduced during the selection of the subjects, follow-up of disease status, or exposure assessment. Biases can also occur in the evaluation of a causal relationship across studies. 

Assume that we have a second set of 20 QC values from a second QC specimen, presumably prepared identically to the specimen from our previous set of values, and found a mean of 199.6 ng/ml and standard deviation 13.5 ng/ml. We can evaluate whether these results are consistent with those from 42 results on the first QC specimen. The null hypothesis for the test is that the two QC specimens have been prepared identically, Pi p2 = 0. The alternative hypothesis would be that they are not identical, pi p2 0. 

The null hypothesis is the crux of hypothesis testing. (It is important to note that the form of the null hypothesis varies in different statistical approaches. As the main type of clinical trial discussed in this book is the therapeutic confirmatory trial, we talk about this first. We then talk briefly about the forms of the null hypothesis that are used in other types of trials in Section 3.10.) As noted earlier, therapeutic confirmatory trials are comparative in nature. We want to evaluate the efficacy of the investi-... 

Step 6 The researcher sees clearly that the regression slope bi is not equal to 0 that is, Fc = 392.70 > Ft = 3.14. Hence, the null hypothesis is rejected. Table 2.6 provides the completed ANOVA model of this evaluation. Table 2.7 provides a MiniTab version of this table. 

To determine whether the organic farmers in South Africa differed in their motivations from farmers in other countries, a chi-square test was applied on data from Fisher (1989), who evaluated the motivations of New Zealand farmers. The null-hypothesis stated that no differences in motivational factors exist between the South African organic farmers and the reference group. 

The use of hypothesis testing to define the LLD has been evaluated previously (1-4), Two states of any measurement system composed of normally distributed random uncertainties are considered the null hypothesis state in which the samples contain no net radioactivity and the distribution about the net count of zero is characterized by the Hean (v ) and the standard deviation (Oq) and, the LLD state (Currie s "alternate hypothesis" in the NUREG) in which the distribution about the net counts at the LLD is characterized by the mean (vq) and the standard deviation (oq). The ultimate question for any sample data is "Which state is most, consistent with the data ". In making this decision, there is a chance that we will falsely conclude the data is part of the distribution about the LLD or that we will falsely conclude the data is part of the distribution about the net count of zero. These risks are defined by the probabilities a and P respectively. These risk probabilities may be chosen at any level... 

In conclusion, animal model systems, especially heart muscle preparations, are in the end indispensable for the quantitative evaluation of the positive inotropic effect of digitalis-congeneric compounds. They appear, however, to be less suitable for the primary screening of the numerous inhibitors of NaVK -ATPase, the microscopic mechanism of which is still unknown. The observations obtained under this condition can, of course, lead to a null hypothesis concerning structure-activity relationships. 

In Example 2.4, we evaluated the nitrate concentration of drinking water using a one-sided t-test at the upper end and testing the hypothesis that the regulated value of SOmgl" nitrate is not exceeded (Hg-.x < pHp.x > p). The computed f-value corresponds to a significance level (p-level) of 0.002373. This value is lower than the specified level of a = 0.05, so that the null hypothesis is rejected as before. 

The calculated probability of 0.011 is substantially less than 0.05. and the null hypothesis is rejected and the alternative hypothesis accepted. Hypothesis testing may be applied to any statistical parameter (/-distribution, / -distribution, etc.) for which a sampling distribution may be calculated or otherwise evaluated. 

The calculated values from any sample are considered as point estimates. Any such estimate may be close to the true value v>f the population (/c, a or other) or it may vary substantially from the true value. An indication of the interval around this point estimate, within which the true value is expected to fall with some stated probability, is called a coiifich iHc interval, and the lower and upper boundary values are called the confidence limits. The probability used to set the interval is called the level of eonfidenee. This level is given by (1 - ), where a is the probability as discussed above for rejecting a null hypothesis when it is true. In most circumstances, means are the most important point estimates, and confidence intervals for means are evaluated at some probability / — (I - a) that the true population mean is within the stated confidence limits. This can be expressed for a population with a known standard deviation a as given in Eq. 21. 

These hypotheses are tentatively adopted and a sample is drawn from each population (I and 2) and the variance calculated. The ratio. Sr/Sj = F(calc) is evaluated. If this ratio is equal to or larger than F(crit), the ratio that would be expected by chance at a probability P = a (0.05 or other) for finding a value as large as F(calc) when the null hypothesis is true, the hypothesis of equality is rejected and the alternatise hypothesis is accepted, i.c., that Sr > St. 

For situations with more than two variances, one statistical test that may be employed is the Hartley F-max procedure. This is a test that may be applied to a balanced database. I.C.. the same number of values in each of the data sets, each set constituting a certain level of a factor in a test program. The variance of each of n data sets to be tested for equivalent variance is evaluated, and the ratio of. S /max), S (min) is calculated and designated as F-max(calc). The value of this is compared to F-ma.x(crit) at a selected P level (0.05 or O.Ot) in tables of the F-max distribution for n factor levels (data sets) and for the common (// for each vairianee estimate. Table AH is i Hartley F-max table. The null hypothesis is... 

In general, the standard error for any normal population mean is equal to o/y/Ti. and the variance is equal to Jn. where n is the number of values that are used to calculate the mean and o is the population variance. For this analysis the term Si is an estimate of the true variance among the k different means. If the null hypothesis is true.. V- can be used to evaluate the population variance. To evaluate the variance for individual population values, the calculated S must be multiplied by the number of test values (replicates) used for each of the means, designated as u,. to give n Sl. which is an estimate of The variance of the individual measurements for each of the k treatments is calculated b ... 

In order to evaluate the null hypothesis (and either reject it or fail to reject it), chemical education researchers need to determine probability values associated with the test statistics (r, F, z, x > Ic.). Computerized statistics programs like SPSS or SAS report the p values along widi the test statistics. If researchers calculate the test statistic on their own, they will need to refer to tables of statistical data that appear in statistics books (2, 5). The p values associated with test statistics represent the probability that researchers would be wrong in assuming that the null hypothesis is incorrect, and the probability that researchers would be wrong in assuming there is an effect due to the instructional lesson. In order to determine whether or not to reject the null... 

---