Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Nomenclature papers

The EPA has issued guidances on chemical nomenclature, commonly called nomenclature papers, that provide additional insight into its interpretation of the term mixture. These guidances illustrate the EPAs definition of mixtures ... [Pg.29]

The nomenclature papers all provide guidance in interpreting the chemical names on the Inventory so that prospective manufacturers and importers can determine if they must file a PMN before they commence manufacturing or importation. They also assist PMN filers with selecting the proper name of their chemicals. [Pg.80]

The lUPAC rules are not the only nomenclature system in use today Chemical Abstracts Service sur veys all the worlds leading scientific journals that publish papers relating to chemistry and publishes brief abstracts of those papers The publication Chemical Abstracts and its indexes are absolutely es sential to the practice of chemistry For many years Chemical Abstracts nomenclature was very similar to lUPAC nomenclature but the tremendous explosion of chemical knowledge has required Chemical Abstracts to modify Its nomenclature so that its indexes are better adapted to computerized searching This means that whenever feasible a compound has a sin gle Chemical Abstracts name Unfortunately this Chemical Abstracts name may be different from any of the several lUPAC names In general it is easier to make the mental connection between a chemical structure and its lUPAC name than its Chemical Abstracts name... [Pg.78]

It should be stated that the nomenclature of the triazine derivatives is not uniform, e.g., in Chemical Abstracts the compounds are often indexed according to another sy.stem than that used in the original papers, and an additional system could have been used for this review. To avoid further complications, the author will u.se the commonest nomeclature in accordance with the representative monographs in this field (see references 12 and 45.)... [Pg.191]

According to the systematic nomenclature these substances were first named l-f-triazolo[d] pyrimidines in compliance with the general principles of the Ring Index/ More recent papers and Chemical Abstracts indexes use the term i -triazolo[4,5-d]pyrimidine (147) in accord with the lUPAC nomenclature. The numbering of substituents when using the last-mentioned name is different from that of the 8-aza analogs. For the formulas of oxygen and sulfur derivatives names derived from the lactim or thiolactim form are almost exclusively in use (in common with the purine derivatives). These derivatives are thus described as hydroxy and mercapto derivatives, respectively. The name 1,2,3,4,6-pentaazaindene is used only rarely for this system. [Pg.239]

Chemical Abstracts), and a-carboline is sold commercially under the name 1-azacarbazole. The trivial norharman nomenclature, in conjunction with numbering as in 1 or as in 6, is still to be found in recent papers. Other systems of numbering, as well as some incorrect systems of nomenclature, are to be found and add to the confusion. [Pg.82]

This nomenclature was first used in a paper by T. Kauffmann and F. P. [Pg.121]

The literature in this field is confusing because of a somewhat haphazard method of nomenclature that has arisen historically. This is compounded by some mistakes in structure determination, reported in early papers, and which are occasionally quoted. The first part of this chapter deals with nomenclature and with a brief overview of early work. Subsequent sections deal with the formation and metabolism of di-D-fructose dianhydrides by micro-organisms, and the formation of dihexulose dianhydrides by protonic and thermal activation. In relation to the latter topic, recent conclusions regarding the nature of sucrose caramels are covered. Other sections deal with the effects of di-D-fructose dianhydrides upon the industrial production of sucrose and fructose, and the possible ways in which these compounds might be exploited. An overview of the topic of conformational energies and implications for product distributions is also presented. [Pg.208]

It should be noted that for convenience in Table 6.7 we used the same nomenclature as in original paper by Qu and Mudawar (2003a). [Pg.296]

Definitions for the variables and constants appearing in eqns. 1 and 2 are given in the nomenclature section at the end of this paper. The first of these equations represents a mass balance around the reactor, assuming that it operates in a differential manner. The second equation is a species balance written for the catalyst surface. The rate of elementary reaction j is represented by rj, and v j is the stoichiometric coefficient for component i in reaction j. The relationship of rj to the reactant partial pressures and surface species coverages are given by expressions of the form... [Pg.121]

Glucose on oxidation gives saccharic acid and on the basis of D-glucose structure, XIV would be D and XV, L on the account of the bottom asymmetric carbon atom. But if XV is rotated in the plane of paper through 180° if becomes exactly identical with XIV. Dispute like this and tartaric acid have raised great interest in improving the system of nomenclature. [Pg.131]

In the older papers the inaccurate old word carbonium ion, which originated from organic chemistry, has not been replaced by the semantically correct term carbenium ion. The appearance of this term marks the time when Olah s discovery of quinquevalent carbon in super-acid solution, the true carbonium ion, made the change of nomenclature essential and urgent. [Pg.16]

The adduct with the re face bound to Rhodium, leading to the 5 enantiomer, is more stable than the Pro-R -coordinated adduct, and so would be the predominant diastereomer in solution. In our original papers on this work [71, 72], we labeled the more stable Pro-5 diastereomer MAJ and the Pro-/ diastereomer MIN in analogy to the nomenclature from Figure 2. For consistency with our later work, however, we use the designations PRO-R and PRO-5 in this chapter. [Pg.119]

Another characteristic point is the special attention that in intermetallic science, as in several fields of chemistry, needs to be dedicated to the structural aspects and to the description of the phases. The structure of intermetallic alloys in their different states, liquid, amorphous (glassy), quasi-crystalline and fully, three-dimensionally (3D) periodic crystalline are closely related to the different properties shown by these substances. Two chapters are therefore dedicated to selected aspects of intermetallic structural chemistry. Particular attention is dedicated to the solid state, in which a very large variety of properties and structures can be found. Solid intermetallic phases, generally non-molecular by nature, are characterized by their 3D crystal (or quasicrystal) structure. A great many crystal structures (often complex or very complex) have been elucidated, and intermetallic crystallochemistry is a fundamental topic of reference. A great number of papers have been published containing results obtained by powder and single crystal X-ray diffractometry and by neutron and electron diffraction methods. A characteristic nomenclature and several symbols and representations have been developed for the description, classification and identification of these phases. [Pg.2]

The aforementioned papers (Guinier et al. 1984, Zvyagin 1987) also contain suggestions and recommendations on the nomenclature and symbolism for use in the general case of either simple or complex polytypic structures. [Pg.172]

Early efforts in what could be termed polymer informatics go back to an ACS symposium on polymer nomenclature in the late 1960s [46-51]. Papers in this symposium were mainly concerned with issues of polymer nomenclature and aspects of information retrieval. A first set of seminal papers only appeared about a decade later, as a consequence of another ACS symposium on the retrieval of polymer information in 1978 [52-59]. Collectively, the papers resulting from the 1978 symposium set out the challenges still faced by polymer informatics today the fuzzy nature of polymers and the variety of different types of descriptions and representations of polymers arising as a consequence, the problem of information... [Pg.113]


See other pages where Nomenclature papers is mentioned: [Pg.459]    [Pg.458]    [Pg.8]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.516]    [Pg.658]    [Pg.792]    [Pg.1253]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.89]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.652]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.460]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.212]    [Pg.231]    [Pg.15]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.403]    [Pg.59]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.29 , Pg.80 ]




SEARCH



Nomenclatures in this Paper

© 2024 chempedia.info