Nomenclature system

Nomenclature refers to a set of rules for establishing chemical names in a unique manner. In early alchemy and modern chemistry, compounds were named often deliberately or according to the origin of the compound. First attempts to a systematic nomenclature emerged in 1597, when the Alchemia of Libavius was published [4]. The material presented there is to some extent still valid. 

Several systems enable searching a chemical compound [5]. Nomenclature systems are summarized in Table 14.1. Undoubtedly, the most well known and famous system is the lUPAC nomenclature which was fixed for the first time during a conference in Geneva in 1892. 

---

The lUPAC rules are not the only nomenclature system in use today Chemical Abstracts Service sur veys all the worlds leading scientific journals that publish papers relating to chemistry and publishes brief abstracts of those papers The publication Chemical Abstracts and its indexes are absolutely es sential to the practice of chemistry For many years Chemical Abstracts nomenclature was very similar to lUPAC nomenclature but the tremendous explosion of chemical knowledge has required Chemical Abstracts to modify Its nomenclature so that its indexes are better adapted to computerized searching This means that whenever feasible a compound has a sin gle Chemical Abstracts name Unfortunately this Chemical Abstracts name may be different from any of the several lUPAC names In general it is easier to make the mental connection between a chemical structure and its lUPAC name than its Chemical Abstracts name... 

Just as It makes sense to have a nomenclature system by which we can specify the con stitution of a molecule m words rather than pictures so too is it helpful to have one that lets us describe stereochemistry We have already had some experience with this idea when we distinguished between E and Z stereoisomers of alkenes... 

There are several types of nomenclature systems that are recognized. Which type to use is sometimes obvious from the nature of the compound. Substitutive nomenclature, in general, is preferred because of its broad applicability, but radicofunctional, additive, and replacement nomenclature systems are convenient in certain situations. 

Systematic nomenclature Systemic antimycotics Systhane Syzygiol Szaibelyite... 

Examples of the two macromolecular nomenclature systems are as foUows. For source-based names for homopolymers and copolymers polyacrylonitrile, poly(methyl methacrylate), poly(acrylainide- (9-vinylpyrroHdinone), polybutadiene- /oi / -polystyrene, and poly(propyl... 

The nomenclature of boron hydride derivatives has been somewhat confusing and many inconsistencies exist in the Hterature. The stmctures of some reported boron hydride clusters are so compHcated that only a stmctural drawing or graph, often accompanied by explanatory text, is used to describe them. Traditional nomenclature systems often can be used to describe compounds unambiguously, but the resulting descriptions may be so long and unwieldy that they are of Htde use. The lUPAC (7) and the Chemical Abstract Service (8) have made recommendations, and nomenclature methods have now been developed that can adequately handle nearly all clusters compounds however, these methods have yet to be widely adopted. Eor the most part, nomenclature used in the original Hterature is retained herein. 

The need for simple descriptions of complicated organic ligands has led to the evolution of some trivial nomenclature systems, such as those for crown ethers (e.g. 76) 72AG(E)16) and cryptands 73MI10200), which have become quite elaborate 8OMII0200). These systems are intended primarily to indicate topology, and the positions of potential donor atoms, and are not particularly appropriate for general use. 

Ollis and Ramsden state that A compound may be appropriately called mesoionic if it is a five-membered heterocycle which cannot be represented satisfactorily by any one covalent or polar structure and possesses a sextet of electrons in association with the five atoms comprising the ring . From the point of view of systematic nomenclature, compounds of this type are difficult to deal with, since most available nomenclature systems are designed so as to name one particular bond- and charge-localized canonical form. 

Binomial nomenclature- System of having two names, genus and specific epithet, for each organism. 

It is often the case that chemists involved or familiar with ethylene oxide (oxiran) chemistry refer to these cyclic oligomers as EO-4, EO-6 and EO-7 respectively. Such designations are informal if not colloquial but, like any name, are useful if they correctly convey an idea. The difficulty with these informalities, indeed with the crown nomenclature system is that it cannot adequately deal with complicated structures or even isomers of simple ones. 

Organic chemists use an informal nomenclature system based on Eischer projections to distinguish between diastereomers. When the caibon chain is vertical and like substituents ar e on the sane side of the Eischer projection, the molecule is described as the erythro diastereomer. When like substituents are on opposite sides of the Eischer projection, the molecule is described as the three diastereomer. Thus, as seen in the... 

As noted in the text, chemists overwhelmingly use the nomenclature system devised and maintained by the International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry, or IUPAC. Rules for naming monofunctional compounds were given throughout the text as each new functional group was introduced, and a list of where these rules can be found is given in Table A.l. 

There is a well-established, simple terminology to identify various siloxane structures, depending on the type of the substituents on silicon atoms. This is given in Table 1. Throughout the text we shall use this convenient nomenclature system. 

Stock system the nomenclature system using oxidation numbers to differentiate between compounds or ions of a given element. 

Some of the rigidly systematic names selected by the Association for Science Education for their nomenclature list in 1985 from the IUPAC possibilities, and some of the systematic indexing names used by Chemical Abstracts since 1972, are given as synonyms in the Index of Chemical Names (Appendix 4). This should assist those coming into industry and research with a command of those nomenclature systems but who may be unfamiliar with the current variety of names used for chemicals. The inclusion where possible of the CAS Registry Number for each title compound should now simplify the clarification of any chemical name or synonym problems, by reference to the Registry Handbook or other CAS source. 

---