New System of Chemical Philosophy

Shortly after publication of Dalton s New System of Chemical Philosophy Gay-Tussac announced his observations that volumes of gas which combine with each other and the volume of the combination thus formed are in direct proportion to the sum of the volumes of the constituent gases. The volumetric proportions of Gay-Tussac and Dalton s gravimetric ratios indeed supplement each other, although they themselves contested and rejected each other s concepts. 

For two thousand years atoms were considered the smallest and indivisible units of nature. At the beginning of the nineteenth century Dalton got chemistry on the path of atomic theory with his book, A New System of Chemical Philosophy, in which he argued that unbreakable atoms form compounds by linking with other atoms in simple... 

New Systems of Chemical Philosophy, John Dalton. Manchester, England, 1810. 

Dalton, John. 1808. A New System of Chemical Philosophy. Manchester and London Bickerstaff, 1808-27. 

There are rules that guide the way in which the various elements can combine, which were most elegantly expressed by John Dalton (1766-1844) in his New System of Chemical Philosophy, published in three volumes between 1808 and 1827. Here he explained the theory of the Law of Multiple Proportions, which formed the basis of his atomic theory, as follows ... 

Dalton, J. (1808, 1810, 1827). A New System of Chemical Philosophy. 3 vols. Manchester, Bickerstaffe, Manchester, Wilson (Vol I Republished 1965, London, Owen). 

John Dalton, A New System of Chemical Philosophy (Manchester S. Russel, 1808) Humphry Davy, Elements of Chemical Philosophy (London Printed for J. Johnson by W. Bulmer, 1812) Jean-Baptiste Dumas, Legons sur la philosophie chimique (Paris Ebrard, 1837). 

After Aristotle, the word synthesis is not found explicitly mentioned in the chemical literature until Dalton used it in his classical book. In the year 1808, Dalton (1766-1844) published his book A New System of Chemical Philosophy , the chapter IB of which is entitled On Chemical Synthesis . However, in the meantime the word synthesis had experienced a semantic change and acquired the modern meaning of forming a compound . There is, therefore, a time lapse of more than twenty centuries, in which the word synthesis was not mentioned by chemists, perhaps because all of them believed as Gerhardt (1816-1856) that "The chemist s activity is therefore exactly opposed to living nature the chemist bums, destroys and operates by analysis. Only the life force works by synthesis it builds up again the edifice tom down by chemical forces" [4], A better ecological manifesto would be... 

This was one of the oddest announcements of a discovery in the history of science. Dalton announced his discovery of his atomic theory while declining to say what the theory was. Five years were to pass before he rectified this omission. The first printed account of his theory was given in his book, A New System of Chemical Philosophy, which was published in 1808. Only 5 of its 220 pages were devoted to an exposition of his theory. However, the atomic nature of matter was assumed throughout the book. 

Since chemists realised the meaning of Dalton s book, published in 1808, and entitled, A New System of Chemical Philosophy, elements have been regarded as distinct and definite substances, which have not been divided into parts different from themselves, and unite with each other in definite quantities by weight which can be accurately expressed as whole multiples of certain fixed quantities and compounds have been regarded as distinct and definite substances which are formed by the union of, and can be separated into, quantities of various elements which are expressible by certain fixed numbers or whole multiples thereof These descriptions of elements and compounds are expressions of actual facts. They enable chemists to state the compositions of all the compounds which are, or can be, formed by the union of any elements. For example, let A, B, C, and D represent four elements, and also certain definite weights of these elements, then the compositions of all the compounds which can be formed by the union of these elements are expressed by the scheme A Bm Cp Dg, where m n p and q are whole numbers. 

Fig. 1.8. Dalton s atoms and the electronic states in an atom. A, a chart in Dalton s A New System of Chemical Philosophy, published in 1808. In modern symbols, these atoms are 1, H 2, N 3, C 4, O 5, P 6, S 7, Mg 8, Ca 9, Na 10, K 11, Sr 12, Ba 13, Fe 14, Zn 15, Cu 16, Pb 17, Ag 18, Pt 19, Au 20, Hg. The major modem modification to Dalton s theory is that the atoms are divisible. The contour maps in B represent typical electronic states in atoms. The outermost contour on each map represents a density of 10 A The successive contours rcpre.sent an increase of a factor of 2. The regions with dashed-curve contours have opposite phases in the wavefunction from those with solid-curve contours.

Dalton s Law of Multiple Proportions meant that two elements combine in simple whole number ratios. Dalton believed that compounds found in nature would be simple combinations. Hence, knowing that hydrogen combines with oxygen to give water, Dalton s formula for water would consist of 1 H and 1 O. Its formula would be HO using modern nomenclature. Both Proust s Law of Definite Proportions and Dalton s Law of Multiple Proportions are outcomes of an atomic view of nature. In 1808 Dalton published his table of relative atomic weights along with his ideas on atomism in A New System of Chemical Philosophy. 

Dalton presented his atomic theory in his bookyl New System of Chemical Philosophy, the first and crucial part of which was published in 1808. His pictures of atoms and molecules provide a unification of the micro-world and the macro-world of chemistry they show at once what we can observe (for example, hydrogen and oxygen combining to make water) and what we cannot the union of real, tangible atoms. Historian of chemistry William Brock says that Dalton s symbols encouraged people to acquire a faith in the reality of chemical atoms and enabled chemists to visualize relatively complex chemical reactions. .. Between them, Lavoisier and Dalton completed a revolution in the language of chemistry. ... 

In the two decades between Lavoisier s Traite and Daltons New System of Chemical Philosophy, we find a conscious effort to accommodate chemical knowledge to a systematic compositional framework. This assimilation was organized through the new nomenclature and the operational concept of simple body. At the same time, there was a great increase in the gathering of quantitative data and attempts to find rational patterns to incorporate them. The results anticipated empirically the laws of constant composition and multiple proportion that reached full rationality in Dalton s atomic theory early in the next century. 

Prior to the publication of the New System of Chemical Philosophy in 1808, Daltons considerable reputation was based on his fundamental work on the behavior of gases. His atomic theory had received some publicity by Thomas Thomson in the third edition of his popular introductory text, A System of Chemistry, in 1807. Thomson gives what he calls a short sketch in a section devoted to the affinity of gases. Like Dalton, he presents the theory synthetically, using Daltons symbols to construct and represent the compound atoms. Probably because the theory is introduced in the context of gases, Thomson always refers to the density of the atoms rather than... 

A few months after these papers were delivered by Thomson and Wollaston, Part I of Daltons New System of Chemical Philosophy was published, in June of 1808. Daltons own assessment of its importance was given in a prospectus published the month before The third chapter is... 

This volume contains presentations from a symposium titled 200 Years of Atoms in Chemistry From Dalton s Atoms to Nanotechnology, held at the 236th national meeting of ACS in Philadelphia in August 2008. The occasion was the 200th aimiversary of the publication of John Dalton s A New System of Chemical Philosophy (1). 

The current paradigm in chemistry celebrates the existence of physical entities called chemical atoms (now known simply as atoms). John Dalton (1766-1844) looked at the material world in which he hved and visualized it in terms of a set of different material objects of small size and combining capacity (7). He called these particles atoms in his New System of Chemical Philosophy (1808). Others, such as Humphry Davy (1778-1829), were not yet willing to see the world in this way. Dalton combined both a partictrlar theory of nature and specific observatiorrs to arrive at his views. The present paper will examine some episodes in the history of chemistry that enabled other chemists to see atoms as appropriate chemical constituents of our world. The view of what constitutes a chemical atom has changed during the time period from 1808 to 2008, but the common theme requires a context in which actual measurements can be viewed as evidence for atoms. ... 

Potassium and sodium.—A. L. Lavoisier8 regarded the alkalies and earths as simple substances which, with increasing knowledge, may prove to be complex. In the second part of his A New System of Chemical Philosophy (London, 1810), J. Dalton considered the metallic oxides potash and soda to be simple elements, and the metals potassium and sodium to be compounds of potash or soda with hydrogen. H. Davy refuted J. Dalton s argument, and later remarked ... 

Dalton, J. A New System of Chemical Philosophy . Republication by Citadel Press (The Science Classic Library) of the 1808 first edition, New York, NY 1964, Chapter II, Section 4, Paragraph 2... 

---