Atoms early theories

In a review of the subject, Ubbelohde [3] points out that there is only a relatively small amount of data available concerning the properties of solids and also of the (product) liquids in the immediate vicinity of the melting point. In an early theory of melting, Lindemann [4] considered that when the amplitude of the vibrational displacements of the atoms of a particular solid increased with temperature to the point of attainment of a particular fraction (possibly 10%) of the lattice spacing, their mutual influences resulted in a loss of stability. The Lennard-Jones—Devonshire [5] theory considers the energy requirement for interchange of lattice constituents between occupation of site and interstitial positions. Subsequent developments of both these models, and, indeed, the numerous contributions in the field, are discussed in Ubbelohde s book [3]. 

Grotthus chain theory phys chem An early theory used to explain the conductivity of an electrolyte. In which it was assumed that the cathode and anode attract hydrogen and oxygen respectively, and the molecules of the electrolyte are stretched out In chains between the electrodes, with decomposition occurring in molecules closest to the electrodes. grot-hus chan, the-3-re group CHEM I.Afamllyofelementswithsimilarchemical properties. 2. Acombina-tlon of bonded atoms that behave as a unit under certain conditions, for example. 

According to an early theory about the atom, the atom looks like a mini solar system. The nucleus of the atom would be the Sun and the electrons are the orbiting planets. This model of the atom is called the Bohr model. It is named for the Danish physicist, Niels Bohr, who proposed electron shells in 1913. The Bohr model is very useful for understanding how atoms work, but it does not answer some questions about the behavior of all atoms. 

The way in which atoms join up to form molecules has traditionally been interpreted in terms of the perceived properties and shape of atoms. An early theory of chemical affinity was summarized by Kekule [16], freely translated here, in terms of the concepts atom, molecule, radical and basicity (also called atomicity) ... 

Empirically measured parameters are additional solvent properties, which have been developed through the efforts of physical chemists and physical organic chemists in somewhat different, but to some extent related, directions. They have been based largely on the Lewis acid base concept, which was defined by G. N. Lewis. The concept originally involved the theory of chemical bonding which stated that a chemical bond must involve a shared electron pair. Thus, an atom in a molecule or ion which had an incomplete octet in the early theory, or a vacant orbital in quantum mechanical terms, would act as an electron pair acceptor (an acid) from an atom in a molecule or ion which had a complete octet or a lone pair of electrons (a base). Further developments have included the concepts of partial electron transfer and a continuum of bonding from the purely electrostatic bonds of ion-ion interactions to the purely covalent bonds of atoms and molecules. The development of the concept has been extensively described (see Ref. 11 for details). 

In chapter 1 we mentioned early theories of bonding, and when we considered the formation of a molecule of chlorine from two chlorine atoms, we drew structures for both chlorine atoms to show the outer electronic configurations. We then considered the covalent bond to result from a sharing of two electrqni re... 

I am indebted to the late Professor Sir Francis Simon for the suggestion that I should write a short book for the new Oxford Library of the Physical Sciences on recent developments in the study of atomic hydrogen. I felt that in writing about recent developments the proper perspective would be gained only by giving at least an outline of the earlier work. Moreover, while excellent presentations of the successive theories up to Dirac s are to be found in text-books, the contemporary experimental situation is rarely described. I have therefore, by way of reminder more than of exposition, sketched the early theories the experimental work I have described rather more fully. 

John Dalton (1766-1844) was the son of a poor Quaker couple. He spent most of his life in Manchester teaching and researching. Although the Greeks, as early as 400 BC, believed that matter consisted of small particles which they called atoms, the theory was revived and elaborated on by Dalton. In 1808 he presented his atomic theory in which he stated ... 

The first so-called aromatic compounds to be studied seriously, such as vanillin (derived from vanilla), had two obvious properties. They had a sweet smell and were remarkably stable. This last property was the reef on which many of the early theories of chemical bonding foundered. Consider benzene. Kekule knew that its molecular formula was C H. The only way he could rationalise this formula with the known properties of benzene, was to imagine the six carbon atoms joined in a ring and connected by three alternate double bonds. This is where the trouble started because double bonds are supposed to confer reactivity on an organic molecule benzene is stable. Double bonds can readily be added to for example, they will undergo fast reactions with bromine and sulphuric acid to give simple "addition" compounds. The reagents simply "add" across the double bond. 

In the early theory of metals it was supposed that aU valence electrons in atoms become free and the metal structure is a lattice of cations immersed in an electron sea . Now it is known that only a part of the outer electrons of atoms are free, since the metallic radii are larger than those of cations (see Chap. 1). Some studies of electron density distribution in metals estimated the metallic/core radii ratio as 1 0.64 [117, 118]. The effective radii of the atomic cores in metallic structures are close to the bond radii of the same metals in crystalline compounds (see Chap. 1) which correspond to atoms with charges not exceeding 1. It should be noted that work functions of bulk metals are always smaller than the first ionization potentials of the corresponding atoms (see Sect. 1.1.2) and therefore there is no reason to suppose the ionization of two or more electrons from an atom. 

---