Multiple Analysis of Variance

This graph shows the effects the way they really are. Note, however, that as the variables increase, the number of interaction terms skyrockets, eating valuable degrees of freedom. Perhaps, a better way to perform this study would be to separate the anatomical sites, because their results are not compared directly anyway, and use a separate statistical analysis for each. However, by the use of dummy variables, the evaluation can be made aU at once. There is also a strong argument to do the study as it is, because the testing is performed on the same unit—a patient—just at different anatomical sites. Multiple analysis of variance could also be used where multiple dependent variables would be employed, but many readers would have trouble... 

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) tests whether one group of subjects (e.g., batch, method, laboratory, etc.) differs from the population of subjects investigated (several batches of one product different methods for the same parameter several laboratories participating in a round-robin test to validate a method, for examples see Refs. 5, 9, 21, 30. Multiple measurements are necessary to establish a benchmark variability ( within-group ) typical for the type of subject. Whenever a difference significantly exceeds this benchmark, at least two populations of subjects are involved. A graphical analogue is the Youden plot (see Fig. 2.1). An additive model is assumed for ANOVA. 

The results of such multiple paired comparison tests are usually analyzed with Friedman s rank sum test [4] or with more sophisticated methods, e.g. the one using the Bradley-Terry model [5]. A good introduction to the theory and applications of paired comparison tests is David [6]. Since Friedman s rank sum test is based on less restrictive, ordering assumptions it is a robust alternative to two-way analysis of variance which rests upon the normality assumption. For each panellist (and presentation) the three products are scored, i.e. a product gets a score 1,2 or 3, when it is preferred twice, once or not at all, respectively. The rank scores are summed for each product i. One then tests the hypothesis that this result could be obtained under the null hypothesis that there is no difference between the three products and that the ranks were assigned randomly. Friedman s test statistic for this reads... 

The dry weights (104 C, 48 hr) of ten plants from each treatment group were taken at the termination of each experiment in order to compare growth effects with plant water status. Dry weight data were analyzed using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan s multiple-range test. Diffusive resistance and water potential were evaluated using the t-test. Each of these and subsequent experiments was replicated. 

If more than two means have to be compared, the (-lest cannot be applied in a multiple way. Instead of this, an indirect comparison by analysis of variance (ANOVA) has to be used, see (3) below. 

Urine, feces and food were analyzed for calcium content by atomic absorption spectrophotometry. Data were subjected to statistical analysis by analysis of variance and Duncan s Multiple Range Test. 

The analysis of rank data, what is generally called nonparametric statistical analysis, is an exact parallel of the more traditional (and familiar) parametric methods. There are methods for the single comparison case (just as Student s t-test is used) and for the multiple comparison case (just as analysis of variance is used) with appropriate post hoc tests for exact identification of the significance with a set of groups. Four tests are presented for evaluating statistical significance in rank data the Wilcoxon Rank Sum Test, distribution-free multiple comparisons, Mann-Whitney U Test, and the Kruskall-Wallis nonparametric analysis of variance. For each of these tests, tables of distribution values for the evaluations of results can be found in any of a number of reference volumes (Gad, 1998). 

Statistical analysis involved multiple anal3rsis of variance using a Duncan s test at a 95% confidence level. 

It is also necessary to decide how the primary endpoint variables will be analysed, what factors will be taken into account and how the result will be expressed. This most frequently involves analysis of variance or covariance. Predetermined comparisons of two or more treatments or doses can be made at specific time points, (e.g. each visit or selected visits) or may be assessed over time, giving an area imder the time curve analysis which will avoid multiple time-point analyses. 

Analysis of Variance (ANOVA). Keeping in mind that the total variance is the sum of squares of deviations from the grand mean, this mathematical operation allows one to partition variance. ANOVA is therefore a statistical procedure that helps one to learn whether sample means of various factors vary significantly from one another and whether they interact significantly with each other. One-way analysis of variance is used to test the null hypothesis that multiple population means are aU equal. 

Statistical Analysis. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) of toxicity data was conducted using SAS/STAT software (version 8.2 SAS Institute, Cary, NC). All toxicity data were transformed (square root, log, or rank) before ANOVA. Comparisons among multiple treatment means were made by Fisher s LSD procedure, and differences between individual treatments and controls were determined by one-tailed Dunnett s or Wilcoxon tests. Statements of statistical significance refer to a probability of type 1 error of 5% or less (p s 0.05). Median lethal concentrations (LCjq) were determined by the Trimmed Spearman-Karber method using TOXSTAT software (version 3.5 Lincoln Software Associates, Bisbee, AZ). 

In summary, there is not much to be gained in using one-way analysis of variance with multiple treatment groups. A simpler analysis structuring the appropriate pairwise comparisons will more directly answer the questions of interest. One final word of caution though undertaking multiple comparisons in this way raises another problem, that of multiplicity. For the time being we will put that issue to one side we will, however, return to it in Chapter 10. 

In this context, each patient would be receiving each of the multiple treatments. In the cross-over trial with three treatments this would likely be a three-period, three-treatment design and patients would be randomised to one of the six sequences ABC, ACB, BAC, BCA, CAB or CBA. Although there are again ways of asking a simultaneous question relating to the equality of the three treatment means through an analysis of variance approach this is unlikely to be of particular relevance questions of real interest will concern pairwise comparisons. 

Genetic association studies may be either family based, or population based (26,27). Family based studies can use transmission disequilibrium tests (TDT), a test that detects association in the presence of linkage. Population-based tests use analysis of variance (ANOVA) among multiple subgroups. The TDT was first proposed by Spielman and Ewens (28). The basic premise of the TDT is that certain alleles at a locus are disproportionately transmitted Irom parents to an affected offspring therefore the basic sampling unit for the TDT is a nuclear family with at least one affected offspring... 

In ail applications of multiple regression which involve equations of more than three terms, a digital computer programme is practically a must. In using the analysis of variance, a fairly useful rule of thumb is that up to 100 data points is not too much to handle by the desk calculator route. 

Most of the statistical tests we use (t test, F test, analysis of variance, multiple regression analysis) are predicated on the assumption that the variation being studied is the same, regardless of whether the property averages 10 or 50 or 75,000. For example, a homoscedastic variable might show variation as follows (several measurements on the same sample )... 

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the effects of coupling agent, concentration, and line speed on adhesion. Significant differences among means were determined by Duncan s multiple range test, using a 95% confidence level. 

Biomedical research at the beginning of the century usually involved relatively few measurements on many subjects. While measurement was expensive, the cost for experimental subjects was often low. The methods for data analysis developed during the same period - r-tests, analysis of variance, multiple regression - were optimized for this situation with many subjects and few measurements. 

Based on models and assumptions of one-way and two-way analyses of variance with or without replications of design points, it is possible to generalize for multiple-way analysis of variance. It is of interest to present the three-way analysis of variance for it is used quite often. In the case of a three-way analysis of variance the total number of observations is N=IxJxKxL, where I, J and K are numbers of levels or columns, rows and layers. L is the number of design-point replications or the number of observations in cells. Fig. 1.18 shows the tridimensional arrangement of columns, rows and layers. 

Testing this null hypothesis is done by analysis of variance of multiple regression shown in Table 1.76. It should also be noted that the unbiased estimate o2 is given as ... 

The postulated model is Y=p0+p1Xi+p2X2+ . Determine regression coefficients and do analysis of variance of multiple regression. From tabulated data the following values are calculated ... 

Lowest observed effect concentration, that is the lowest concentration in the tested series at which a biological effect is observed (i.e., where the mean value for the observed response is significantly different from the controls). It is one of the tested concentrations obtained, for example, after analysis of variance and multiple comparison statistical testing (e.g, Dunnett test). Volume 1(3,4), Volume 2(8,11). 

Each experiment can also be called a treatment. It refers to a defined combination of fixed levels of the factors. Repeated (multiple) measurements of such a combination are said to be members of one and the same class, sometimes called a cell. In our above example, we may then have performed four replicate analyses, so that in each cell we have four members (objects, measurements), e.g. in class 11 , yn,i Tn,2, Jit,3, Jit,41-Analysis of variance (see also Section 3.3.9) then can be used to evaluate the results. 

Behavioral data may be analyzed with the Mann-Whitney U test for comparing two groups (parametric Student s t test may be used only if data are normally distributed), or analysis of variance (ANOVA) for multiple groups, followed by an appropriate post hoc test. 

Analysis of variance (ANOVA and MANOVA) has been used to investigate the influence of location on forms of metals in roadside soil (Nowak, 1995). Multiple regression analysis has proved valuable in processing sequential extraction data to obtain information on plant availability of trace metals in soils (Qian et al, 1996 ... 

Statistics. Where appropriate, the data in each experiment were subjected to analysis of variance. Means were tested for significant differences (P < 0.05) by the sequential methods of Newman and Keuls multiple range test. 

All data were presented as mean SEM. The data were evaluated statistically for differences by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) followed by post hoc Tukey test for multiple comparisons, p < 0.05 was regarded as significant. Calculations were done using GraphPad Prism. 

Fig. 1. (—)-Iinalool attenuates mechanical allodynia induced by spinal nerve ligation in mice. (A and B) Mechanical allodynia developed and maintained over time following spinal nerve ligation (SNL). (A) A single dose of linalool (100 mg/kg s.c.) did not cause any significant changes compared to SNL and vehicle-treated animals. (B) Linalool administered daily for 7 days attenuated mechanical allodynia compared to SNL animals and SNL animals treated with the vehicle ( p < 0.001 vs vehicle ANOVA+Tukey test). Data are expressed as mean SEM of the value corresponding to 50% of pain threshold and are normalized to the basal value of each animal. Differences are evaluated using oneway analysis of variance (ANOVA), followed by post hoc Tukey multiple comparison tests, p < 0.05 was regarded as significant.

The computational procedures required for most multiple regression and correlation analyses are difficult, and demand computer capability to perform the necessary operation. A computer program for multiple regression and correlation analysis will typically include an analysis of variance (ANOVA) of the regression (Table 2.3). 

---