Monsanto methanol carbonylation

Figure 5-7. The Monsanto methanol carbonylation process for producing acetic acid. ...

We can best understand the process by looking at Scheme 9.11, which is largely a revisit of Scheme 9.10. Note that the reagents in brackets are those for the Monsanto methanol carbonylation. The E-H process uses methyl acetate instead of methanol as one of the starting materials and acetic acid rather than H20 to react with acetyl iodide at the end. 

The proposed reductive elimination of acetyl iodide from the Rh(III) coordination sphere is an important step in the Monsanto methanol carbonylation process (2) [73]. In the proposed catalytic cycle (Scheme 30), the oxidative addition of iodo-methane, formed from HI and methanol, is followed by the carbonyl insertion into the Rh-Me bond. The reductive elimination of acetyl iodide followed by its rapid hydrolysis furnishes the acetic acid and regenerates free HI. 

Ca.ta.lysis, The readily accessible +1 and +3 oxidation states of rhodium make it a useful catalyst. There are several reviews of the catalytic properties of rhodium available (130—132). Rhodium-catalyzed methanol carbonylation (Monsanto process) accounted for 81% of worldwide acetic acid by 1988 (133). The Monsanto acetic acid process is carried out at 175°0 and 1.5 MPa (200 psi). Rhodium is introduced as RhCl3 but is likely reduced in a water... 

It is now nearly 40 years since the introduction by Monsanto of a rhodium-catalysed process for the production of acetic acid by carbonylation of methanol [1]. The so-called Monsanto process became the dominant method for manufacture of acetic acid and is one of the most successful examples of the commercial application of homogeneous catalysis. The rhodium-catalysed process was preceded by a cobalt-based system developed by BASF [2,3], which suffered from significantly lower selectivity and the necessity for much harsher conditions of temperature and pressure. Although the rhodium-catalysed system has much better activity and selectivity, the search has continued in recent years for new catalysts which improve efficiency even further. The strategies employed have involved either modifications to the rhodium-based system or the replacement of rhodium by another metal, in particular iridium. This chapter will describe some of the important recent advances in both rhodium- and iridium-catalysed methanol carbonylation. Particular emphasis will be placed on the fundamental organometallic chemistry and mechanistic understanding of these processes. 

Methanol carbonylation has been the subject of several reviews, including Denis Forster s seminal studies at Monsanto [4-10]. This chapter will not seek to repeat all the information included in those reviews but will focus on the role of organometallic chemistry in recent process development. 

One approach which enables lower water concentrations to be used for rhodium-catalysed methanol carbonylation is the addition of iodide salts, especially lithium iodide, as exemplified by the Hoechst-Celanese Acid Optimisation (AO) technology [30]. Iodide salt promoters allow carbonylation rates to be achieved at low (< 4 M) [H2O] that are comparable with those in the conventional Monsanto process (where [H20] > 10 M) while maintaining catalyst stability. In the absence of an iodide salt promoter, lowering the water concentration would result in a decrease in the proportion of Rh existing as [Rh(CO)2l2] . However, in the iodide-promoted process, a higher concentration of methyl acetate is also employed, which reacts with the other components as shown in Eqs. 3, 7 and 8 ... 

It was discovered by Monsanto that methanol carbonylation could be promoted by an iridium/iodide catalyst [1]. However, Monsanto chose to commercialise the rhodium-based process due to its higher activity under the conditions used. Nevertheless, considerable mechanistic studies were conducted into the iridium-catalysed process, revealing a catalytic mechanism with similar key features but some important differences to the rhodium system [60]. 

The commercialisation of an iridium-based process is the most significant new development in methanol carbonylation catalysis in recent years. Originally discovered by Monsanto, iridium catalysts were considered uncompetitive relative to rhodium on the basis of lower activity, as often found for third row transition metals. The key breakthrough for achieving high catalytic rates for an iridium catalyst was the identification of effective promoters. Recent mechanistic studies have provided detailed insight into how the promoters influence the subtle balance between neutral and anionic iridium complexes in the catalytic cycle, thereby enhancing catalytic turnover. 

In SILP carbonylation we have introduced a new methanol carbonylation SILP Monsanto catalyst, which is different from present catalytic alcohol carbonylation technologies, by using an ionic liquid as reaction medium and by offering an efficient use of the dispersed ionic liquid-based rhodium-iodide complex catalyst phase. In perspective the introduced fixed-bed SILP carbonylation process design requires a smaller reactor size than existing technology in order to obtain the same productivity, which makes the SILP carbonylation concept potentially interesting for technical applications. 

In situ HP IR studies of methanol carbonylation reactions were originally undertaken by Forster and co-workers at Monsanto. Using a transmission cell, it was shown that for the rhodium catalyst, the dominant species (at relatively high... 

A substantial advance was made by discovery of the rhodium-catalyzed methanol carbonylation to acetic acid, developed by Monsanto. 

Acetic Acid. Although at the time of this writing Monsanto s Rh-catalyzed methanol carbonylation (see Section 7.2.4) is the predominant process in the manufacture of acetic acid, providing about 95% of the world s production, some acetic acid is still produced by the air oxidation of n-butane or light naphtha. n-Butane is used mainly in the United States, whereas light naphtha fractions from petroleum refining are the main feedstock in Europe. 

The recent dramatic increase in the price of petroleum feedstocks has made the search for high selectivities more urgent. Several new processes based on carbon monoxide sources are currently competing with older oxidation processes.103,104 The more straightforward synthesis of acetic acid from methanol carbonylation (Monsanto process) has made the Wacker process obsolete for the manufacture of acetaldehyde, which used to be one of the main acetic acid precursors. Several new methods for the synthesis of ethylene glycol have also recently emerged and will compete with the epoxidation of ethylene, which is not sufficiently selective. The direct synthesis of ethylene... 

Acetic acid (CH3COOH) is a bulk commodity chemical with a world production of about 3.1 x 106 Mg/year, a demand increasing at a rate of +2.6% per year and a market price of US 0.44-0.47 per kg (Anon., 2001a). It is obtained primarily by the Monsanto or methanol carbonylation process, in which carbon monoxide reacts with methanol under the influence of a rhodium complex catalyst at 180°C and pressures of 30-40 bar, and secondarily by the oxidation of ethanol (Backus et al., 2003). The acetic fermentation route is limited to the food market and leads to vinegar production from several raw materials (e.g., apples, malt, grapes, grain, wines, and so on). 

In this chapter we discuss the mechanistic and other details of a few industrial carbonylation processes. These are carbonylation of methanol to acetic acid, methyl acetate to acetic anhydride, propyne to methyl methacrylate, and benzyl chloride to phenyl acetic acid. Both Monsanto and BASF manufacture acetic acid by methanol carbonylation, Reaction 4.1. The BASF process is older than the Monsanto process. The catalysts and the reaction conditions for the two processes are also different and are compared in the next section. Carbonylation of methyl acetate to acetic anhydride, according to reaction 4.2, is a successful industrial process that has been developed by Eastman Kodak. The carbonylation of propyne (methyl acetylene) in methanol to give methyl methacrylate has recently been commercialized by Shell. The Montedison carbonylation process for the manufacture of phenyl acetic acid from benzyl chloride is noteworthy for the clever combination of phase-transfer and organometallic catalyses. Hoechst has recently reported a novel carbonylation process for the drug ibuprofen. 

The BASF cobalt/iodide catalyzed process for methanol carbonylation was quite quickly superseded by a rhodium/iodide catalyzed process discovered at Monsanto and first commercialized in 1970 at a plant in Texas City. The Monsanto process was a significant advance and became one of the few large tonnage processes to use a homogeneous transition metal catalyst. It was later... 

Interest in iridium-catalyzed methanol carbonylation was rekindled in the 1990 s when BP Chemicals developed and commercialized the Cativa process, which utilizes an iridium/iodide catalyst and a ruthenium promoter. This process has the important advantage that the highest catalytic rates occur at significantly lower water concentration (ca. 5% wt) than for Monsanto s... 

The basic organometallic reaction cycle for the Rh/I catalyzed carbonylation of methyl acetate is the same as for methanol carbonylation. However some differences arise due to the absence of water in the anhydrous process. As described in Section 4.2.4, the Monsanto acetic acid process employs quite high water concentrations to maintain catalyst stability and activity, since at low water levels the catalyst tends to convert into an inactive Rh(III) form. An alternative strategy, employed in anhydrous methyl acetate carbonylation, is to use iodide salts as promoters/stabilizers. The Eastman process uses a substantial concentration of lithium iodide, whereas a quaternary ammonium iodide is used by BP in their combined acetic acid/anhydride process. The iodide salt is thought to aid catalysis by acting as an alternative source of iodide (in addition to HI) for activation of the methyl acetate substrate (Equation 17) ... 

Although the carbonylation of methanol using an iodide-promoted iridium complex was first reported by Monsanto researchers Roth and Pauhk in 1968, and its mechanism studied by Forster and others, it was the rhodium system that was initially developed for commercialization. A more complex mechanism for iridium, involving both anionic and neutral intermediates was discovered, but it would take over twenty years to coimnercialize an iridium-based system for methanol carbonylation (Scheme 21). In the Cativa process, the iridium complex is promoted by two distinct... 

This development began to reduce steadily the capacities of acetaldehyde which previously had been made by oxidation of ethylene (Wacker-Hoechst process cf. Section 2.4.1) and converted to acetic acid (cf. Section 2.4.4). Moreover, the Monsanto process, the second-generation process for methanol carbonylation is now being followed by the third generation of highly efficient carbonylation processes, enabling acetic anhydride as well as acetic acid to be produced (cf Scheme 2 Tennessee-Eastman [36] and BP [37] processes). The most advanced process (Hoechst [40]) has so far not been implemented industrially because of neglects... 

Acetic acid is a key commodity building block [1], Its most important derivative, vinyl acetate monomer, is the largest and fastest growing outlet for acetic acid. It accounts for an estimated 40 % of the total global acetic acid consumption. The majority of the remaining worldwide acetic acid production is used to manufacture other acetate esters (i.e., cellulose acetates from acetic anhydride and ethyl, propyl, and butyl esters) and monoehloroacetic acid. Acetic acid is also used as a solvent in the manufacture of terephthalic acid [2] (cf. Section 2.8.1.2). Since Monsanto commercially introduced the rhodium- catalyzed carbonylation process Monsanto process ) in 1970, over 90 % of all new acetic acid capacity worldwide is produced by this process [2], Currently, more than 50 % of the annual world acetic acid capacity of 7 million metric tons is derived from the methanol carbonylation process [2]. The low-pressure reaction conditions, the high catalyst activity, and exceptional product selectivity are key factors for the success of this process in the acetic acid industry [13]. 

Since 1979, numerous reviews have appeared on the kinetics, mechanisms, and process chemistry of the metal-catalyzed methanol carbonylation reaction [11, 14-20], especially the Monsanto rhodium-catalyzed process. In this section, the traditional process chemistry as patented by Monsanto is discussed, with emphasis on some of the significant improvements that Monsanto s licensee, Celanese Chemicals (CC) has contributed to the technology. The iridium-based methanol carbonylation process recently commercialized by BP Chemicals Ltd. (BP) will be discussed also. 

The low-pressure acetic acid process was developed by Monsanto in the late 1960s and proved successful with commercialization of a plant producing 140 X 10 metric tons per year in 1970 at the Texas City (TX, USA) site [21]. The development of this technology occurred after the commercial implementation by BASF of the cobalt-catalyzed high-pressure methanol carbonylation process [22]. Both carbonylation processes were developed to utilize carbon monoxide and methanol as alternative raw materials, derived from synthesis gas, to compete with the ethylene-based acetaldehyde oxidation and saturated hydrocarbon oxidation processes (cf. Sections 2.4.1 and 2.8.1.1). Once the Monsanto process was commercialized, the cobalt-catalyzed process became noncom-... 

In 1996 BP announced the commercialization of their version of a low-water methanol carbonylation technology named Cativa based upon a promoted iridium catalyst. The Cativa process replaced the high-water Monsanto process which had been used by BP. 

The reaction chemistry of the rhodium-catalyzed methanol carbonylation process under Monsanto conditions has been investigated extensively [6-8, 10, 12, 21, 26-29] (cf Section 2.1.2.1.1). The overall reaction kinetics are first order in both rhodium catalyst and methyl iodide promoter. The reaction is zero order in methanol and zero order in carbon monoxide partial pressure above 2 atm (eq. (6)) [27]. The kinetics agree well with the basic mechanism common to the three carbonylation reactions (see Section 2.1.2.1.1 and Tables 1 and 2). 

---