Processes methanol carbonylation

With the permission of the author [3], we borrow here data (Table 1) which indicates the production capacity of the major industrial processes using oxygen for functionalizing hydrocarbons. The production of acetic acid should be added to the list, although 60% of its 6.1 million t/year total world capacity (to reach 67% in the next future) is due to the Monsanto process (methanol carbonylation) [4]. Only the rest (2.4 million t/year) is produced by oxidation of butane or other alkanes or acetaldehyde or, for a small proportion, hy the Showa Denko process (oxidation of ethylene). 

Process Methanol carbonylation Acetaldehyde oxidation -Butane oxidation Other Total... 

This reaction mechanism is supported by model studies. Paricularly advantageous are the mild reaction conditions (30-40 bar, 150-200°C) and the high selectivity with respect to methanol (99 %) and CO (> 90 %) compared to the older cobalt process. Methanol carbonylation is one of the few industrially important catalytic reactions whose kinetics are known in full [7]. 

With the advent of a moderate pressure process, methanol carbonylation was now commercially viable and methanol carbonylation would be the preferred process from this point forward, although there would be significant improvements in the catalyst system as will be described in the next section of this chapter. While often overlooked, this process would not have been feasible without the earlier development of corrosion resistant alloys in the late 1950 s. 

The equilibrium of the methanol synthesis reaction severely limits the conversion in the conventional process. The equilibrium conversion is very sensitive to temperature. The high recycling rate is costly and requires oxygen instead of air in the autothermal reforming or partial oxidation step. The development of low-temperature and continuous methanol removal processes mentioned brieffy in Section 1.3.1, would be very attractive [6365]. Hi single-pass conversion could also be attained with a two-step process methanol carbonylation to methyl formate followed by methyl formate hydrogenolysis to 2 mol methanol [6669]. Research in these areas has yielded promising results. 

In 1968 a new methanol carbonylation process using rhodium promoted with iodide as catalyst was introduced by a modest letter (35). This catalyst possessed remarkable activity and selectivity for conversion to acetic acid. Nearly quantitative yields based on methanol were obtained at atmospheric pressure and a plant was built and operated in 1970 at Texas City, Tex. The effect on the world market has been exceptional (36). 

Synthesis gas is obtained either from methane reforming or from coal gasification (see Coal conversion processes). Telescoping the methanol carbonylation into an esterification scheme furnishes methyl acetate directly. Thermal decomposition of methyl acetate yields carbon and acetic anhydride,... 

The Eastman acetic anhydride [108-24-7] process provides an extension of carbonylation chemistry to carboxyUc acid esters. The process is based on technology developed independendy in the 1970s by Eastman and Halcon SD. The Eastman acetic anhydride process involves carbonylation of methyl acetate [79-20-9] produced from coal-derived methanol and acetic acid [64-19-7]. 

There are two processes used commercially for DMF manufacture. A two-step process iavolves carbonylation of methanol [67-56-1] to methyl formate [107-31 -3] and reaction of the formate with dimethylamine. 

The methanol carbonylation is performed ia the presence of a basic catalyst such as sodium methoxide and the product isolated by distillation. In one continuous commercial process (6) the methyl formate and dimethylamine react at 350 kPa (3.46 atm) and from 110 to 120°C to effect a conversion of about 90%. The reaction mixture is then fed to a reactor—stripper operating at about 275 kPa (2.7 atm), where the reaction is completed and DMF and methanol are separated from the lighter by-products. The cmde material is then purified ia a separate distillation column operating at atmospheric pressure. 

Butane. Butane LPO has been a significant source for the commercial production of acetic acid and acetic anhydride for many years. At various times, plants have operated in the former USSR, Germany, Holland, the United States, and Canada. Only the Hoechst-Celanese Chemical Group, Inc. plants in Pampa, Texas, and Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, continue to operate. The Pampa plant, with a reported aimual production of 250,000 t/yr, represents about 15% of the 1994 installed U.S. capacity (212). Methanol carbonylation is now the dominant process for acetic acid production, but butane LPO in estabhshed plants remains competitive. 

Acetic Acid. Methanol carbonylation has become the process of choice for production of this staple of the organic chemical industry, which is used in the manufacture of acetate fibers, acetic anhydride [108-24-7] and terephthaUc acid, and for fermentation (see Acetic acid and derivatives). 

Ca.ta.lysis, The readily accessible +1 and +3 oxidation states of rhodium make it a useful catalyst. There are several reviews of the catalytic properties of rhodium available (130—132). Rhodium-catalyzed methanol carbonylation (Monsanto process) accounted for 81% of worldwide acetic acid by 1988 (133). The Monsanto acetic acid process is carried out at 175°0 and 1.5 MPa (200 psi). Rhodium is introduced as RhCl3 but is likely reduced in a water... 

An analogue of the transesterification process has also been demonstrated, in which the diacetate of BPA is transesterified with dimethyl carbonate, producing polycarbonate and methyl acetate (33). Removal of the methyl acetate from the equihbrium drives the reaction to completion. Methanol carbonylation, transesterification using phenol to diphenyl carbonate, and polymerization using BPA is commercially viable. The GE plant is the first to produce polycarbonate via a solventiess and phosgene-free process. 

Metha.no Ca.rbonyla.tion, An important industrial process cataly2ed by rhodium complexes in solution is methanol carbonylation to give acetic acid. 

Fig. 6. Process flow diagram for methanol carbonylation to make acetic acid (22).

Figure 5-7. The Monsanto methanol carbonylation process for producing acetic acid. ...

Today most dimethyl carbonate is made by methanol carbonylation (Equation 3.2) using a copper chloride catalyst with a very long life. This process produces pure dimethyl carbonate, which is not now classified as harmful, and water as a by-product. 

Special reactions Haber process, exhaust clean up etc. Hydroformylation of alkenes, methanol carbonylation, asymmetric synthesis etc... 

Of the three catalytic systems so far recognized as being capable of giving fast reaction rates for methanol carbonylation—namely, iodide-promoted cobalt, rhodium, and iridium—two are operated commercially on a large scale. The cobalt and rhodium processes manifest some marked differences in the reaction area (4) (see Table I). The lower reactivity of the cobalt system requires high reaction temperatures. Very high partial pressures of carbon monoxide are then required in the cobalt system to... 

As a case study an acetic acid process has been given. Acetic acid is produced by a liquid-phase methanol carbonylation. Acetic acid is formed by the reaction between methanol and carbon monoxide which is catalysed by rhodium iodocarbonyl catalyst. The process diagram is shown in Figure 7. 

It is now nearly 40 years since the introduction by Monsanto of a rhodium-catalysed process for the production of acetic acid by carbonylation of methanol [1]. The so-called Monsanto process became the dominant method for manufacture of acetic acid and is one of the most successful examples of the commercial application of homogeneous catalysis. The rhodium-catalysed process was preceded by a cobalt-based system developed by BASF [2,3], which suffered from significantly lower selectivity and the necessity for much harsher conditions of temperature and pressure. Although the rhodium-catalysed system has much better activity and selectivity, the search has continued in recent years for new catalysts which improve efficiency even further. The strategies employed have involved either modifications to the rhodium-based system or the replacement of rhodium by another metal, in particular iridium. This chapter will describe some of the important recent advances in both rhodium- and iridium-catalysed methanol carbonylation. Particular emphasis will be placed on the fundamental organometallic chemistry and mechanistic understanding of these processes. 

Methanol carbonylation has been the subject of several reviews, including Denis Forster s seminal studies at Monsanto [4-10]. This chapter will not seek to repeat all the information included in those reviews but will focus on the role of organometallic chemistry in recent process development. 

From a commercial viewpoint potential benefits can accrue from operating the methanol carbonylation process at low water concentration, provided that catalyst stability can be maintained. Strategies to achieve this include (i) addition of iodide salts to stabilise the Rh catalyst, (ii) heterogenisation of the Rh catalyst on a polymer support to restrict the catalyst to the reactor and (iii) replacement of Rh by a more robust Ir catalyst. These strategies, along with others for improving catalyst activity, will be discussed in the following sections. 

One approach which enables lower water concentrations to be used for rhodium-catalysed methanol carbonylation is the addition of iodide salts, especially lithium iodide, as exemplified by the Hoechst-Celanese Acid Optimisation (AO) technology [30]. Iodide salt promoters allow carbonylation rates to be achieved at low (< 4 M) [H2O] that are comparable with those in the conventional Monsanto process (where [H20] > 10 M) while maintaining catalyst stability. In the absence of an iodide salt promoter, lowering the water concentration would result in a decrease in the proportion of Rh existing as [Rh(CO)2l2] . However, in the iodide-promoted process, a higher concentration of methyl acetate is also employed, which reacts with the other components as shown in Eqs. 3, 7 and 8 ... 

The ionic attachment strategy for catalytic methanol carbonylation has recently seen a resurgence of interest from both industry [49-53] and academic groups [54-57]. Most significantly, in 1998 Chiyoda and UOP announced their Acetica process, which uses a polyvinylpyridine resin tolerant of elevated temperatures and pressures [8,58]. The process attains increased... 

It was discovered by Monsanto that methanol carbonylation could be promoted by an iridium/iodide catalyst [1]. However, Monsanto chose to commercialise the rhodium-based process due to its higher activity under the conditions used. Nevertheless, considerable mechanistic studies were conducted into the iridium-catalysed process, revealing a catalytic mechanism with similar key features but some important differences to the rhodium system [60]. 

In 1996, BP Chemicals announced a new methanol carbonylation process, Cativa , based upon a promoted iridium/iodide catalyst which now operates on a number of plants worldwide [61-69]. Promoters, which enhance the catalytic activity, are key to the success of the iridium-based process. The mechanistic aspects of iridium-catalysed carbonylation and the role of promoters are discussed in the following sections. 

The commercialisation of an iridium-based process is the most significant new development in methanol carbonylation catalysis in recent years. Originally discovered by Monsanto, iridium catalysts were considered uncompetitive relative to rhodium on the basis of lower activity, as often found for third row transition metals. The key breakthrough for achieving high catalytic rates for an iridium catalyst was the identification of effective promoters. Recent mechanistic studies have provided detailed insight into how the promoters influence the subtle balance between neutral and anionic iridium complexes in the catalytic cycle, thereby enhancing catalytic turnover. 

In SILP carbonylation we have introduced a new methanol carbonylation SILP Monsanto catalyst, which is different from present catalytic alcohol carbonylation technologies, by using an ionic liquid as reaction medium and by offering an efficient use of the dispersed ionic liquid-based rhodium-iodide complex catalyst phase. In perspective the introduced fixed-bed SILP carbonylation process design requires a smaller reactor size than existing technology in order to obtain the same productivity, which makes the SILP carbonylation concept potentially interesting for technical applications. 

There has been a recent resurgence of interest in iridium catalysed methanol carbonylation, arising from the commercialisation by BP Chemicals of the Cativa process. This uses a promoted iridium catalyst and has now superseded the rhodium catalyst on a number of plants. Its success relies on the discovery of promoters which increase catalytic activity, particularly at commercially desirable low water concentrations. HP IR spectroscopy has been used to investigate the behavior of... 

---