Processes Monsanto

The industrial organic electrosynthesis reaction of greatest impact must be the Monsanto process for the hydrodimerization of acrylonitrile to 

At the cathode, other reactions are possible such as reaction of acrylonitrile with OH- or direct protonation of the radical anion [CH2=CHCN] - to give propionitrile. The existence of several possible pathways is general in the synthesis of organic compounds, and optimized experimental conditions, such as choice of electrode potentials that minimize unwanted lateral reactions, must be sought. In this particular case pH control is also of obvious importance in minimizing the unwanted reactions. 

The present process is shown schematically in Fig. 15.6. The solution is an emulsion of acrylonitrile and 10-15 per cent disodium hydrogen-phosphate in water containing a quaternary ammonium salt, hexamethylene-bis(ethyldibutylammonium) phosphate, to conduct the current. The anode is carbon steel and the cathode is cadmium (a sheet fixed on to the anode) this cell is a good example of the use of bipolar electrodes (Section 15.3). EDTA and borax are added in small quantities 

---

This reaction is rapidly replacing the former ethylene-based acetaldehyde oxidation route to acetic acid. The Monsanto process employs rhodium and methyl iodide, but soluble cobalt and iridium catalysts also have been found to be effective in the presence of iodide promoters. 

Ca.ta.lysis, The readily accessible +1 and +3 oxidation states of rhodium make it a useful catalyst. There are several reviews of the catalytic properties of rhodium available (130—132). Rhodium-catalyzed methanol carbonylation (Monsanto process) accounted for 81% of worldwide acetic acid by 1988 (133). The Monsanto acetic acid process is carried out at 175°0 and 1.5 MPa (200 psi). Rhodium is introduced as RhCl3 but is likely reduced in a water... 

Reports of bench-scale electroorganic reactions date back to the nineteenth century (18). Although the Nalco and Monsanto processes are the only two really large-scale operations, there has been significant growth in processes on a small scale. At least 60 processes appear to be commercial woddwide (4). A listing of some processes can be found in Table 5 further details and a listing of more processes are also available (4,5,25,88, and 99—104). 

A.sahi Chemical EHD Processes. In the late 1960s, Asahi Chemical Industries in Japan developed an alternative electrolyte system for the electroreductive coupling of acrylonitrile. The catholyte in the Asahi divided cell process consisted of an emulsion of acrylonitrile and electrolysis products in a 10% aqueous solution of tetraethyl ammonium sulfate. The concentration of acrylonitrile in the aqueous phase for the original Monsanto process was 15—20 wt %, but the Asahi process uses only about 2 wt %. Asahi claims simpler separation and purification of the adiponitrile from the catholyte. A cation-exchange membrane is employed with dilute sulfuric acid in the anode compartment. The cathode is lead containing 6% antimony, and the anode is the same alloy but also contains 0.7% silver (45). The current efficiency is of 88—89%, with an adiponitrile selectivity of 91%. This process, started by Asahi in 1971, at Nobeoka City, Japan, is also operated by the RhcJ)ne Poulenc subsidiary, Rhodia, in Bra2il under Hcense from Asahi. 

Acetic acid from methanol by the Monsanto process, CH3OH -1-CO CH3COOH, rhodium iodide catalyst, 3 atm (44 psi), 150°C (302°F), 99 percent selectivity of methanol. 

Rheological and processability behaviors were studied in a Monsanto processability tester (MPT), which is an automatic high-pressure capillary viscometer. The entire barrel and capillary are electrically heated with a microprocessor-based temperature controller [14], The... 

Other catalyst systems such as iron V2O5-P2O5 over silica alumina are used for the oxidation. In the Monsanto process (Figure 6-4), n-butane and air are fed to a multitube fixed-bed reactor, which is cooled with molten salt. The catalyst used is a proprietary modified vanadium oxide. The exit gas stream is cooled, and crude maleic anhydride is absorbed then recovered from the solvent in the stripper. Maleic anhydride is further purified using a proprietary solvent purification system. ... 

Figure 6-4. The Monsanto process for producing maleic anhydride from butane (1) reactor, (2) absorber (3) stripper, (4) fractionator, (5) solvent purification.

In the Monsanto/Lummus Crest process (Figure 10-3), fresh ethylbenzene with recycled unconverted ethylbenzene are mixed with superheated steam. The steam acts as a heating medium and as a diluent. The endothermic reaction is carried out in multiple radial bed reactors filled with proprietary catalysts. Radial beds minimize pressure drops across the reactor. A simulation and optimization of styrene plant based on the Lummus Monsanto process has been done by Sundaram et al. Yields could be predicted, and with the help of an optimizer, the best operating conditions can be found. Figure 10-4 shows the effect of steam-to-EB ratio, temperature, and pressure on the equilibrium conversion of ethylbenzene. Alternative routes for producing styrene have been sought. One approach is to dimerize butadiene to 4-vinyl-1-cyclohexene, followed by catalytic dehydrogenation to styrene ... 

An early success story in the field of catalytic asymmetric synthesis is the Monsanto Process for the commercial synthesis of l-DOPA (4) (see Scheme 1), a rare amino acid that is effective in the treatment of Parkinson s disease.57 The Monsanto Process, the first commercialized catalytic asymmetric synthesis employing a chiral transition metal complex, was introduced by W. S. Knowles and coworkers and has been in operation since 1974. This large-scale process for the synthesis of l-DOPA (4) is based on catalytic asymmetric hydrogenation, and its development can be... 

Such a complex, cw-Rh(CO)2I2, is the active species in the Monsanto process for low-pressure carbonylation of methanol to ethanoic acid. The reaction is first order in iodomethane and in the rhodium catalyst the rate-determining step is oxidative addition between these followed by... 

Only two distillation stages are needed for water and propanoic acid removal. This results in lower energy consumption which contributes to the overall reduction in CO2 emissions to 0.31 t/t product compared to 0.48 t/t product with the Monsanto process. 

The carbonylation of methanol was developed by Monsanto in the late 1960s. It is a large-scale operation employing a rhodium/iodide catalyst converting methanol and carbon monoxide into acetic acid. An older method involves the same carbonylation reaction carried out with a cobalt catalyst (see Section 9.3.2.4). For many years the Monsanto process has been the most attractive route for the preparation of acetic acid, but in recent years the iridium-based CATIVA process, developed by BP, has come on stream (see Section 9.3.2) ... 

Acetic acid is presently produced on a very large scale. World-wide production in 1977 was approximately 2,500,000 tons. The Monsanto process has now been licensed world-wide, and production from these plants when constructed will amount to more than 1,000,000 tons annually. 

UCB-MCI [Union Chimique—Chemische Bedrijven and Ministry of Chemical Industry for the USSR] An EHD process for making adiponitrile, differing from the Monsanto process in using an emulsion of acrylonitrile and in not using a membrane. 

One very important feature of the Monsanto process was the fact that the reaction was started with a slurry of reactants and ended with a slurry of the pure product with close to 100% ee, allowing easy separation of both the catalyst and the undesired racemate in one step. Critical issues for both the Monsanto and the VEB Isis processes were the quality of the starting material (enamide syntheses are often problematic) and especially the concentration of oxygen and peroxides in the reaction solution. 

The basic chemistry, the early Monsanto process brought on stream in 1965 by Baizer [102-104], and the new Monsanto process based on an undivided cell, combining simpler cell design, less complex product extraction and reduced energy consumption have all been summarized by Pletcher and Walsh [10] (see Scheme 4). 

Monoterpenoid ketones, 24 536-541 Monoterpenoids, 24 468, 470, 472, 484-541 Monothiocarboxylic acids, 23 739 Monotropic phase transitions, 15 101 Monounsaturated fatty acids, 10 830 Monounsaturated olefins, hydrogenation of, 26 879-880 Monovinylacetylene, 1 230 Monsanto acetic acid process, 19 646 Monsanto adiponitrile process, 17 236 Monsanto aluminum chloride-based Alkylation process, 23 333 Monsanto Prism separator, 16 21 Monsanto process (Lummus-UOP Classic process), 16 74 23 339, 341 Monsanto-Washington University collaboration, 24 390, 400-401 Montanic acid... 

It is now nearly 40 years since the introduction by Monsanto of a rhodium-catalysed process for the production of acetic acid by carbonylation of methanol [1]. The so-called Monsanto process became the dominant method for manufacture of acetic acid and is one of the most successful examples of the commercial application of homogeneous catalysis. The rhodium-catalysed process was preceded by a cobalt-based system developed by BASF [2,3], which suffered from significantly lower selectivity and the necessity for much harsher conditions of temperature and pressure. Although the rhodium-catalysed system has much better activity and selectivity, the search has continued in recent years for new catalysts which improve efficiency even further. The strategies employed have involved either modifications to the rhodium-based system or the replacement of rhodium by another metal, in particular iridium. This chapter will describe some of the important recent advances in both rhodium- and iridium-catalysed methanol carbonylation. Particular emphasis will be placed on the fundamental organometallic chemistry and mechanistic understanding of these processes. 

One approach which enables lower water concentrations to be used for rhodium-catalysed methanol carbonylation is the addition of iodide salts, especially lithium iodide, as exemplified by the Hoechst-Celanese Acid Optimisation (AO) technology [30]. Iodide salt promoters allow carbonylation rates to be achieved at low (< 4 M) [H2O] that are comparable with those in the conventional Monsanto process (where [H20] > 10 M) while maintaining catalyst stability. In the absence of an iodide salt promoter, lowering the water concentration would result in a decrease in the proportion of Rh existing as [Rh(CO)2l2] . However, in the iodide-promoted process, a higher concentration of methyl acetate is also employed, which reacts with the other components as shown in Eqs. 3, 7 and 8 ... 

---