Monomers electron donor-acceptor interaction

Broadening the scope, we may briefly consider a nonexhaustive panorama of various types and features of supramolecular polymers depending on their constitution, characterized by three main parameters the nature of the core/framework of the monomers, the type of noncovalent interaction(s), and the eventual incorporation of functional subunits. The interactions may involve complementary arrays of hydrogen-bonding sites, electrostatic forces, electronic donor-acceptor interactions, metalion coordination, etc. The polyassociated structure itself may be of main-chain, side-chain, or branched, dendritic type, depending on the number and disposition of the interaction subunits. The central question is that of the size and the polydispersity of the polymeric supramolecular species formed. Of course their size is expected to increase with concentration and the polydispersity depends on the stability constants for successive associations. The dependence of the molecular weight distribution on these parameters may be simulated by a mathematical model [19]. These features are detailed in Chapters 2, 3, and 6 for various growth mechanisms. 

The effect of polarity on vinyl monomer copolymerization has long been recognized and is a major factor in the Q, e scheme and copolymerization theory. Mayo, Lewis, and Walling tabulated a number of vinyl monomers into an average activity series and an electron donor-acceptor series (62). The activity series showed the effect of substituents on the ease with which an ethylene derivative reacted with an average radical and on stabilizing the radical which was formed thereby. The electron donor-acceptor series indicated the ability of the substituents to serve as donors or acceptors in radical-monomer interactions. It is significant that in both series the dominant factor is the radical-monomer interaction. 

Exercise 6.6. One answer for Problem 6 of Chapter 2 is c/oso-I-THF-2-PB5H4. It is a monomer from which one might construct a square joined by P-B donor-acceptor interactions. With closo-1-THF-6-PB5H4 an extended chain of clusters can be constructed, (a) Draw the chain, define the repeat unit and distance, and draw the pertinent orbitals of the repeat unit, (b) Develop qualitative band and DOS diagrams and predict whether the solid would have a band gap or not. (c) Partial reduction of the chain by adding 10 mole% Li is carried out. Assume the electron goes into a cluster-based orbital and the closed cluster structure is retained. Predict the change in the electronic properties. 

A special case of donor-acceptor interactions occurs when two monomers come into contact such that one exhibits a signicant donor and the other an acceptor character. The donor-acceptor complex then has the structure of a zwitterion resulting from the combination of radical ions after electron transfer from donor to acceptor... 

When conjugation between the two double bonds is interrupted by a substituent R, electron transfer to the other double bond is only insignificantly hindered. Important data on donor-acceptor interactions between monomer and metal, and on the effects of R, solvents and temperature on electron transfer [scheme (86)] can be derived from the rate of generation and composition of the products. 

The study of the interaction mechanism of thin films of BACY prepolymer on different surface states of Si and oxidized Al employing advanced techniques such as XPS, UPS, MIES, IR reflection spectroscopy, and AFM was undertaken by Possart and Dieckhoff [364]. The trioxy triazine was the only moiety identified to have adhesive interaction with the substrate. On a Si surface, the mechanism was identified as donor-acceptor interaction where the lone pairs of electrons on N and O atoms of trioxy triazine were involved in the electron donor process for the Si cation. On aluminum oxide, the Lewis acidic OH groups act as electron acceptors, withdrawing electron density from the lone pairs of O and N of the trioxy triazine. Back donation of electron density from Al metal to the organic layer is operative beneath the oxide layer. The dicyanate monomer doesn t adhere at all and desorbs quickly out of the interphase region on the substrate. It was concluded that thermosetting reaction of the prepolymer is thus hampered and the resulting network will be less dense near the substrate than in the bulk. 

Present views concerning the operation mechanism of ZN catalysts are not conclusive. Cossee [288, 289] assumes that, in the first step, donor-acceptor interaction occurs between the transition metal and the monomer. A a bond is formed by the overlap of the monomer n orbital with the orbital of the transition metal. A second n bond is formed by reverse (retrodative) donation of electrons from the orbital of the transition metal into the antibonding 7T orbital of the monomer. In the following phase, a four-centre transition complex is formed with subsequent monomer insertion into the metal-carbon bond. This, in principle, monometallic concept is criticized by the advocates of the necessary presence of a further metal in the active centre. According to them, the centre is bimetallic. Monometallic centres undoubtedly exist on the other hand, technically important ZN catalysts are multicomponent systems in which each component has its specific and non-negligible function in active centre formation. The non-transition metal in these centres is their inherent component, and most probably the centre is bimetallic. Even present ideas concerning the structural difference in centres producing isotactic and atactic polymers are not united. 

Interestingly, Michalak and coworkers [47] have compared the results of using point-charge polarized monomer electron densities with those obtained using unperturbed densities for halogen bonds. They find that polarizing the molecular components of the complex reduces the contribution assigned to donor-acceptor interactions in their ETS-NOCV (extended transition state - natural orbitals for chemical valence) scheme, but does not eliminate it entirely. This is consistent... 

The change of the spectral characteristics, as well as the fact of the dissolution of fullerene C in water with PVP itself, confirms the formation of interaction between the fullerene and PVP, most probably of a donor-acceptor type. According to the NMR 13C data in D20 the electronic state of carbon atoms C(1) and C(4) of pyrrolidone cycle and C(5) of monomer unit of PVP, nearest to nitrogen atom, cardinally changes in the complex (Vinogradova et al., 1998). 

Two mechanisms have been proposed to explain the strong alternation tendency between electron-acceptor and electron-donor monomers. The polar effect mechanism (analogous to the polar effect in chain transfer—Sec. 3-6c-2) considers that interaction between an electron-acceptor radical and an electron-donor monomer or an electron-donor radical and... 

In the last twenty years there has been increasing interest in charge-transfer polymerizations . The essential character of such polymerizations is the interaction between an electron-donor (D) and an electron-acceptor (A) monomer in the initiation and/or propagation processes. 

In contrast to the radical-monomer interaction in the transition state proposed by Mayo and Walling (62, 63), the formation of a molecular complex between the electron donor monomer and the electron acceptor monomer—i.e., monomer-monomer interaction—has been proposed as the contributing factor in the free radical alternating copolymerization of styrene and maleic anhydride (8) as well as sulfur dioxide and mono-or diolefins (6, 9, 12, 13, 25, 41, 42, 43, 44, 61, 79, 80, 88). Walling and co-workers (83, 84) did note a relationship between the tendency to form molecular complexes and the alternating tendency and considered the possibility that alternation involved the attack of a radical on a molecular complex. However, it was the presence in the transition state of polar resonance forms resembling those in the colored molecular complexes which led to alternation in copolymerization (84). 

In contrast, the donor monomer-acceptor monomer interaction involves a one-electron transfer from the donor monomer to the acceptor monomer to form a charge transfer complex. The latter undergoes homopolymerization through a radical mechanism to give an alternating copolymer. 

Iwatsuki and Yamashita (46, 48, 50, 52) have provided evidence for the participation of a charge transfer complex in the formation of alternating copolymers from the free radical copolymerization of p-dioxene or vinyl ethers with maleic anhydride. Terpolymerization of the monomer pairs which form alternating copolymers with a third monomer which had little interaction with either monomer of the pair, indicated that the polymerization was actually a copolymerization of the third monomer with the complex (45, 47, 51, 52). Similarly, copolymerization kinetics have been found to be applicable to the free radical polymerization of ternary mixtures of sulfur dioxide, an electron donor monomer, and an electron acceptor monomer (25, 44, 61, 88), as well as sulfur dioxide and two electron donor monomers (42, 80). 

As discussed above, monomer molecules are capable of functioning either as it-electron donors and n-electron acceptors (e.g. C=C double bond containing compounds), respectively, or as n-electron donors (e.g. epoxides). Therefore, their ground or excited states can interact with donor or acceptor molecules, which are unable to polymerize. For that interaction the general Scheme 3 holds, too. Clearly, in these cases only a homopolymerization of the monomer used takes place. The mechanism of that reaction depends on the electronic properties existing (e.g. monomer acts as donor or acceptor), and on the structural conditions in both molecules. Again, in some cases a proton transfer reaction could occur. 

---