Monitoring and evaluation system

A good monitoring and evaluation system should provide information about an organization s or system s performance of the function(s) which it is perceived to carry out, and show where improvements can be made. 

Legal support involves granting legal authority to organizational and other bodies to perform stated regulatory functions as well as the authority to impose sanctions when violations occur. 

Outcomes, on the other hand, are the final results obtained by carrying out the different regulatory activities and functions. 

As discussed below, outcomes are often not readily measurable. And even if it is possible to develop measures, empirical data may not be available for the assessment, since a long period of time must elapse before relevant outcomes can be seen. The analysis may have to rely on data relating to intermediate outputs. 

---

Provide adequate documentation for program staff Implement a strong monitoring and evaluation system... 

Hernandez, Gonzalo. 2006. M E of Social Programs in Mexico. In Ernesto May, David Shand, Keith MacKay, Fernando Rojas, and Jaime Saavedra, eds., Towards the Institutionalization of Monitoring and Evaluation Systems in Latin America and the Caribbean Proceedings of a World Bank/Inter-American Development Bank Conference, pp. 47—52. Washington, DC World Bank. 

LVHV nozzles can create problems that may be sufficiently severe as to prevent their use, usually in the form of ergonomic encumbrances and excessive noise. These problems can be dealt with, to limited extents, and LVHV applications can be effective. It must also be understood that dust control by 1..VHV systems is ultimately limited. No ventilation control measure can ensure sufficient worker protection down to extraordinatily low acceptable dust levels. Worker protection must always be confirmed by industrial hygiene monitoring and evaluation, and administrative control measures such as respiratory protection may be necessary. 

Quality control is intended to monitor and evaluate the performances of both food and human processes that contribute to food quality. The basic principle of this function is the control circle that involves (1) the taking of a process sample by the analysis or measuring unit, (2) determining whether process results meet set tolerances or limits, (3) judging the character and level of any discrepancy, and (4) application of corrective action to adjust the system to an acceptable level (Figure 7.1.1). A distinction is made between measuring and analysis, whereby the first involves direct measurements (e.g., pH, temperature) and the second involves taking samples, sample preparation, and actual analysis. ... 

This step involves the in-plant pro j ect team in the monitoring and evaluation of the progress and success of the implemented options/system on the bases of safety, quality, technology, costs, and environmental impact. 

Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) (2005). Technologies and Techniques for Early Warning Systems to Monitor and Evaluate Drinking Water Quality State-of-the-Art Review. Office of Research and Development. National Homeland Security. Research Center, 2005 (http //www.mosselmonitor. nl/downloads/reportEW S120105.pdf). 

After cut-over, the performance of the MRP II system should be monitored and evaluated. This is sometimes referred to as Performance Qualification (PQ). The PQ protocol should be prepared identifying key performance metrics such as... 

These systems share the common characteristic that performance of the detailed work processes is monitored and evaluated by tracking key... 

Definitions are fundamental to the establishment of any functioning surveillance system. There must be different definitions for monitoring and evaluation. An... 

It has been noted that the lack of basic health data is a major constraint at all stages of planning, monitoring and evaluation of health services. Consequently it is not possible to make an accurate assessment of the health status of Nigerians. In fact, the system of collecting basic health data on births, deaths, the occurrence of major diseases and other health indicators on a countr5nvide basis is still developmental. 

EPA, 2005. Technologies and techniques for early warning systems to monitor and evaluate drinking water quality A state-of-the-art review. US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Water Office of Science and Technology. Health and Ecological Criteria Division, Report EPA/600/R-05/156, 236 pp. 

This guide identifies the advantages of competitive voucher schemes in delivering subsidies describes the circumstances under which they are superior to other subsidy mechanisms and explains how to design, implement, monitor, and evaluate a voucher scheme. It provides a broad outline of the problems faced by health systems, the rationale for government intervention, and the different ways in which governments and donors subsidize health care. 

For exploration, monitoring and evaluation of (enhanced) natural attenuation processes it is important to imderstand the possibilities and restrictions of the common monitoring systems such as (multi-level) sampling wells, dosimeters or immission calculations. The influence of heterogeneity on sampled concentrations in a given observation well has already been demonstrated in Section 9.2.2, now we will focus on the problem of installation of a set of sampling wells to measure the concentrations in the subsurface as accurately as possible. 

Resource environmental monitoring and evaluation index system is composed by many index, Different types of index have different meanings and some of the index are similar. Different index are also have different weight. 

---