Monitoring and evaluation

E. J. Graha, ed.. Scientific Considerations in Monitoring and Evaluating Toxicological Research, Hemisphere Publishing Corp., Washington, D.C., 1981. 

LVHV nozzles can create problems that may be sufficiently severe as to prevent their use, usually in the form of ergonomic encumbrances and excessive noise. These problems can be dealt with, to limited extents, and LVHV applications can be effective. It must also be understood that dust control by 1..VHV systems is ultimately limited. No ventilation control measure can ensure sufficient worker protection down to extraordinatily low acceptable dust levels. Worker protection must always be confirmed by industrial hygiene monitoring and evaluation, and administrative control measures such as respiratory protection may be necessary. 

Continue, modify nr end initiative as indicated by monitoring and evaluation results. 

Type of operation The EIS should define the type of operation (i.e., constant speed or variable speed) that best describes the normal operation of each machine-train. This information allows the analyst to determine the best method of monitoring and evaluating each machine. 

The Competent Authority to which the incident was originally reported usually takes on the role of monitoring and evaluating how the incident is dealt with. When all actions are complete, including any necessary Field Safety Correction Actions, the manufacturer must submit a final report to the Competent Authority. Under a safeguard clause. Competent Authorities may take unilateral action to remove a device from their market, if they believe that it poses an unacceptable health risk, but the Commission must be informed of such actions. In less-urgent situations, concerns may be referred to the Committee for Medical Devices for consideration. 

Standardize the official environment for fairness. Create the same environment for everyone - for example, apply the same selection and matching principles, the same rules of formality, and the same principles regarding monitoring and evaluation to every pair in your scheme. 

Quality control is intended to monitor and evaluate the performances of both food and human processes that contribute to food quality. The basic principle of this function is the control circle that involves (1) the taking of a process sample by the analysis or measuring unit, (2) determining whether process results meet set tolerances or limits, (3) judging the character and level of any discrepancy, and (4) application of corrective action to adjust the system to an acceptable level (Figure 7.1.1). A distinction is made between measuring and analysis, whereby the first involves direct measurements (e.g., pH, temperature) and the second involves taking samples, sample preparation, and actual analysis. ... 

Table 5.6 Existence of mechanisms for planning, monitoring and evaluation...

A good monitoring and evaluation system should provide information about an organization s or system s performance of the function(s) which it is perceived to carry out, and show where improvements can be made. 

Q Monitoring and Evaluating Trends in Sediment and Water Indicators... 

Monitoring and Evaluating Trends in Methylmercury Accumulation in Aquatic Biota... 

---