Microscopic techniques atomic force microscopy

To obtain the morphology information, including phase separation and crystalline, we can now use microscopic techniques, atomic force microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, electron tomography, variable-angle spectroscopic ellipsometry. X-ray photoemission spectroscopy, and grazing-incidence X-ray diffraction. The detailed information of this characterization methods can be found from the specific reference (Li et al., 2012 Huang et al., 2014). 

To understand the principles at which biological systems operate, detailed studies on ultrastructure, material properties, force range, and motion pattern during locomotion are necessary. Such studies have become possible in the past several years due to new developments (1) in microscopical visualization techniques (atomic force microscopy, freezing and environmental scanning electron microscopy), (2) in characterisation of mechanical properties of biological materials and structures in situ and in vivo (measurements of stiffness, hardness, adhesion, friction) at local and global scales, and (3) in computer simulations. 

We have considered briefly the important macroscopic description of a solid adsorbent, namely, its speciflc surface area, its possible fractal nature, and if porous, its pore size distribution. In addition, it is important to know as much as possible about the microscopic structure of the surface, and contemporary surface spectroscopic and diffraction techniques, discussed in Chapter VIII, provide a good deal of such information (see also Refs. 55 and 56 for short general reviews, and the monograph by Somoijai [57]). Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and atomic force microscopy (AFT) are now widely used to obtain the structure of surfaces and of adsorbed layers on a molecular scale (see Chapter VIII, Section XVIII-2B, and Ref. 58). On a less informative and more statistical basis are site energy distributions (Section XVII-14) there is also the somewhat laige-scale type of structure due to surface imperfections and dislocations (Section VII-4D and Fig. XVIII-14). 

Microscopic techniques, 70 428 Microscopists, role of, 76 467 Microscopy, 76 464-509, See also Atomic force microscopy (AFM) Electron microscopy Light microscopy Microscopes Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) acronyms related to, 76 506-507 atomic force, 76 499-501 atom probe, 76 503 cathodoluminescence, 76 484 confocal, 76 483-484 electron, 76 487-495 in examining trace evidence, 72 99 field emission, 76 503 field ion, 76 503 fluorescence, 76 483 near-held scanning optical,... 

Other more advanced microscopic techniques have been developed, including near-held scanning optical microscopy [166] and scanning probe microscopy techniques, such as atomic force microscopy and scanning tunnelling microscopy [166, 167],... 

In addition to surface analytical techniques, microscopy, such as scanning electron microscopy (SEM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM), also provide invaluable information regarding the surface morphology, physico-chemical interaction at the fiber-matrix interface region, surface depth profile and concentration of elements. It is beyond the scope of this book to present details of all these microscopic techniques. 

Powerful methods that have been developed more recently, and are currently used to observe surface micro topographs of crystal faces, include scanning tunnel microscopy (STM), atomic force microscopy (AFM), and phase shifting microscopy (PSM). Both STM and AFM use microscopes that (i) are able to detect and measure the differences in levels of nanometer order (ii) can increase two-dimensional magnification, and (iii) will increase the detection of the horizontal limit beyond that achievable with phase contrast or differential interference contrast microscopy. The presence of two-dimensional nuclei on terraced surfaces between steps, which were not observable under optical microscopes, has been successfully detected by these methods [8], [9]. In situ observation of the movement of steps of nanometer order in height is also made possible by these techniques. However, it is possible to observe step movement in situ, and to measure the surface driving force using optical microscopy. The latter measurement is not possible by STM and AFM. 

There was, however, one topic which was not included in the first edition, which has undergone substantial development in the intervening years. It could have been foreseen in 1986 a paper was presented at the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium entitled Ultrasonic pin scanning microscope a new approach to ultrasonic microscopy (Zieniuk and Latuszek 1986,1987). With the advent of atomic force microscopy, it proved possible to combine the nanometre-scale spatial resolution of scanning probe microscopy with the sensitivity to mechanical properties of acoustic microscopy. The technique became known as ultrasonic force microscopy, and has been joined by cognate techniques such as atomic force acoustic microscopy, scanning local-acceleration microscopy, and heterodyne force microscopy. 

In atomic force microscopy (AFM), the sharp tip of a microscopic probe attached to a flexible cantilever is drawn across an uneven surface such as a membrane (Fig. 1). Electrostatic and van der Waals interactions between the tip and the sample produce a force that moves the probe up and down (in the z dimension) as it encounters hills and valleys in the sample. A laser beam reflected from the cantilever detects motions of as little as 1 A. In one type of atomic force microscope, the force on the probe is held constant (relative to a standard force, on the order of piconewtons) by a feedback circuit that causes the platform holding the sample to rise or fall to keep the force constant. A series of scans in the x and y dimensions (the plane of the membrane) yields a three-dimensional contour map of the surface with resolution near the atomic scale—0.1 nm in the vertical dimension, 0.5 to 1.0 nm in the lateral dimensions. The membrane rafts shown in Figure ll-20b were visualized by this technique. 

In research on the mechanisms gouverning the modification reactions, the thin silica layers allow the application of various surface analytical techniques, which are of no use for analysis inside porous systems. Reaction mechanisms are simplified by the elimination of porosity and may be studied by direct surface techniques such as ellipsometry, as well as microscopic techniques such as Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM).59... 

Until fairly recently, the theories described in Secs. II and III for particle-surface interactions could not be verified by direct measurement, although plate-plate interactions could be studied by using the surface forces apparatus (SFA) [61,62]. However, in the past decade two techniques have been developed that specifically allow one to examine particles near surfaces, those being total internal reflection microscopy (TIRM) and an adapted version of atomic force microscopy (AFM). These two methods are, in a sense, complementary. In TIRM, one measures the position of a force-and torque-free, colloidal particle approximately 7-15 fim in dimension as it interacts with a nearby surface. In the AFM method, a small (3.5-10 jam) sphere is attached to the cantilever tip of an atomic force microscope, and when the tip is placed near a surface, the force measured is exactly the particle-surface interaction force. Hence, in TIRM one measures the position of a force-free particle, while in AFM one measures the force on a particle held at a fixed position. 

There are many pieces of evidence that convince us that matter is made up of atoms. Some of the most compelling evidence comes from scanning probe microscopy. This technique employs a microscopic rip, which responds to a surface to reveal its architecture. The principal methods of scanning probe microscopy are scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and atomic force microscopy (AFM). 

Atomic force microscopy. Scanning electron microscopes do not provide the necessary resolution for analyzing detail morphology of certain membrane layers of very fine pore sizes such as those suitable for ultrafiltration and gas separation. While transmission electron microscopes are capable of examining very small scale structures, the technique is limited to only very thin specimens. This makes sample preparation for a multilayered membrane very difficult and tedious. 

---