Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Microphases separated film

The core-shell type polymer microspheres were synthesized upon the chemical crosslinking of the spherical microdomains in the microphase separated films. The block copolymers were dissolved in 1,1,2-trichloroeth-... [Pg.602]

Fig. 25 Formation of microphase-separated films from poly(tetrahydrofuren) crosslinked with oligonucleotides. Reprinted with permission from [111]... Fig. 25 Formation of microphase-separated films from poly(tetrahydrofuren) crosslinked with oligonucleotides. Reprinted with permission from [111]...
Fig. 9 a Chemical structure of the diblock copolymer and the six-point H-bonding. b Deposition of NPs onto block copolymer microphase separated film, c AFM image indicating the specific deposition of NPs. Reprinted with permission from [56]... [Pg.189]

The surface structure of chloroform-cast PBLG-PI-PBLG was studied by XPS and contact angle measurements [38]. It was found that the chemical composition of the microphase-separated films at the surface was different from that in the bulk. The PI content at the film surface was higher than that in the bulk. Water contact angle measurements indicated that the block copolymer films were wetted easier than the respective homopolymers. This was explained in terms of the interfacial regions of unordered amino acid sequences, which were proposed to be located at the film surface. Finally,... [Pg.85]

Morphologies observed in microphase separated films thermally annealed under various conditions As determined by Marc HiUmyer 8 As determined in this study... [Pg.45]

Figure 22 Schematic representations of conformation of AB diblock macromonomers in microphase-separated film and in micelle (a) separated film (b) micelle. Figure 22 Schematic representations of conformation of AB diblock macromonomers in microphase-separated film and in micelle (a) separated film (b) micelle.
The microphase structure was clearly observed in transmission electron micrographs of the film of amphiphilic copolymers cast from aqueous solutions [29, 31]. An important finding was that no microphase structure was observed for the film cast from organic solutions. This difference indicates that a microphase structure is formed in aqueous solution, but not in organic solution. Different hydrophobic groups showed considerably different morphological features i.e. whether microphase separation leads to a secondary or higher structure depends on the type of hydrophobic units in the copolymers [31],... [Pg.66]

Since the compartmentalization occurs as a result of microphase separation of an amphiphilic polyelectrolyte in aqueous solution, an aqueous system is the only possible object of study. This limitation is a disadvantage from a practical point of view. Our recent studies, however, have shown that this disadvantage can be overcome with a molecular composite of an amphiphilic polyelectrolyte with a surfactant molecule [129], This composite was dissolvable in organic solvents and dopable in polymer film, and the microphase structure was found to remain unchaged in the composite. This finding is important, because it has made it possible to extend the study on photo-systems involving the chromophore compartmentalization to organic solutions and polymer solid systems. [Pg.93]

ABA type poly(hydroxyethyl methacrylate) (HEMA) and PDMS copolymers were synthesized by the coupling reactions of preformed a,co-isocyanate terminated PDMS oligomers and amine-terminated HEMA macromonomers312). Polymerization reactions were conducted in DMF solution at 0 °C. Products were purified by precipitation in diethyl ether to remove unreacted PDMS oligomers. After dissolving in DMF/toluene mixture, copolymers were reprecipitated in methanol/water mixture to remove unreacted HEMA oligomers. Microphase separated structures were observed under transmission electron microscope, using osmium tetroxide stained thin copolymer films. [Pg.45]

FIGURE 20.10 (a,b) Phase images of cryo-ultramicrotomed surfaces of triblock copolymer styrene and ethylene-butylene (SEES) samples of neat material and loaded with oil (40 wt%), respectively. (c,d) Phase images of film of triblock copolymer poly(methyl methacrylate-polyisobutylene-poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA-PIB-PMMA) immediately after spin-casting and after 3 h annealing at 100°C, respectively. Inserts in the top left and right comers of the images show power spectra with the value stmctural parameter of microphase separation. [Pg.568]

Blockcopolymer microphase separation [9] Depending on the length of chemically different blocks of monomers in a block copolymer, ordered nanostructures can be obtained in bulk samples and thin films. The film morphology can differ significantly from the bulk morphology, but because the structure is determined by the pair-pair interaction of monomers and/or an interface, and it is a thermodynamically stable structure, it is classified as self-assembly. [Pg.188]

Secondly, we describe the site-selective introduction of a functional molecule, tetrakis-5,10,15,20-(4-carboxyphenyl)porphyrin (TCPP), into the microphase separation structure of a diblock copolymer film of PS-fo-P4VP. Since porphyrin derivatives show various functionalities such as sensitization, redox activity, and nonlinear optical effect, a polymer nanodot array containing a porphyrin at a high concentration would be applicable to a light-harvesing and charge transporting nanochannel. [Pg.204]

As aforementioned, diblock copolymer films have a wide variety of nanosized microphase separation structures such as spheres, cylinders, and lamellae. As described in the above subsection, photofunctional chromophores were able to be doped site-selectively into the nanoscale microdomain structures of the diblock copolymer films, resulting in nanoscale surface morphological change of the doped films. The further modification of the nanostructures is useful for obtaining new functional materials. Hence, in order to create further surface morphological change of the nanoscale microdomain structures, dopant-induced laser ablation is applied to the site-selectively doped diblock polymer films. [Pg.213]

As a final example of catalytic hydrogenation activity with polymer-stabilized colloids, the studies of Cohen et al. should be mentioned [53]. Palladium nanoclusters were synthesized within microphase-separated diblock copolymer films. The organometallic repeat-units contained in the polymer were reduced by exposing the films to hydrogen at 100 °C, leading to the formation of nearly monodisperse Pd nanoclusters that were active in the gas phase hydrogenation of butadiene. [Pg.224]

Solid films of our block copolymers and their surface behavior have been examined using a variety of techniques. Block copolymers composed of incompatible polymer blocks are known for mesophase formation as a consequence of the microphase separation of the chains. Our fluorinated block copolymers form a microphase-separated structure with a high degree of order. This can easily be visualized by polarization microscopy and SAXS. [Pg.161]

We have already mentioned that depending on composition, semicrystalline triblock copolymers can show some conflict between microphase separation and superstructure formation. In fact, one of the controversial aspects is the question whether block copolymers can or cannot exhibit spherulites. This is a relevant question because spherulitic structures greatly affect the ultimate mechanical properties, and the boundaries between adjacent spherulites are often weak points in mechanical performance. Kim et al. [125] studied the competition between crystallization within microphase-separated regions and reorganization into supermolecu-lar spherulites in semicrystalline PS-b-PB-b-PCL triblock copolymers. These authors found that the formation of spherulites is strongly affected by the thickness of the specimen in such a way that thin films crystallize into... [Pg.57]

In addition to the previously mentioned driving forces that determine the bulk state phase behavior of block copolymers, two additional factors play a role in block copolymer thin films the surface/interface energies as well as the interplay between the film thickness t and the natural period, Lo, of the bulk microphase-separated structures [14,41,42], Due to these two additional factors, a very sophisticated picture has emerged from the various theoretical and experimental efforts that have been made in order to describe... [Pg.198]

We are currently initiating three research projects that include (1) the synthesis of reflective liquid crystal/polymer composite films, (2) a study of microphase separation in hyperbranched block copolymers, and (3) the design and synthesis of polar organic thin films, which is the subject of this proposal. (47 words aim for 41 words)... [Pg.430]

Figure 6.7 Illustration of multipoint hydrogen bonding based self-assembly (a) hydrogen bond formation between barbituric acid functionalized gold nanoparticles and Hamilton receptor functionalized block copolymers and (b) selective deposition of nanoparticles on a microphase-separated block copolymer film. Reprinted with permission fi om Binder et al. (2005). Copyright 2005 American Chemical Society. Figure 6.7 Illustration of multipoint hydrogen bonding based self-assembly (a) hydrogen bond formation between barbituric acid functionalized gold nanoparticles and Hamilton receptor functionalized block copolymers and (b) selective deposition of nanoparticles on a microphase-separated block copolymer film. Reprinted with permission fi om Binder et al. (2005). Copyright 2005 American Chemical Society.
Binder WH, Kluger C, Straif CJ, Eriedbacher G. Directed nanoparticle binding onto microphase-separated block copolymer thin films. Macromolecules 2005 38 9405-9410. [Pg.152]

For the pairs with relatively short PS and PEG chains (e.g., 15a 16a and 15b 16b), no microphase separation was observed in the corresponding spin-cast films (Li et al. 2005). The AFM image of 15b 16b was drastically different, although... [Pg.221]


See other pages where Microphases separated film is mentioned: [Pg.606]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.606]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.426]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.60]    [Pg.568]    [Pg.203]    [Pg.208]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.160]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.169]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.58]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.645]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.158 , Pg.162 , Pg.175 ]




SEARCH



Microphase

Microphase separations

Microphase-separated

Microphases

Microphases separation

© 2024 chempedia.info