Microfiltration chemical

Phase Separation. Microporous polymer systems consisting of essentially spherical, intercoimected voids, with a narrow range of pore and ceU-size distribution have been produced from a variety of thermoplastic resins by the phase-separation technique (127). If a polyolefin or polystyrene is insoluble in a solvent at low temperature but soluble at high temperatures, the solvent can be used to prepare a microporous polymer. When the solutions, containing 10—70% polymer, are cooled to ambient temperatures, the polymer separates as a second phase. The remaining nonsolvent can then be extracted from the solid material with common organic solvents. These microporous polymers may be useful in microfiltrations or as controlled-release carriers for a variety of chemicals. 

Whereas many of these technologies are not really new, they have never had the regulatory and economic justification for their use in metallizing. Each of these general methods has many variants. Some may be directed to waste treatment, some to recycle, and some to reclaim. An example is filtration, used to prevent release to air of zinc particles from flame spraying, microfiltration of cleaners to extend hfe, in combination with chemical precipitation to remove metal particles from wastewater, and many other uses. 

Process Description Gas-separation membranes separate gases from other gases. Some gas filters, which remove hquids or sohds from gases, are microfiltration membranes. Gas membranes generally work because individual gases differ in their solubility and diffusivity through nonporous polymers. A few membranes operate by sieving, Knudsen flow, or chemical complexation. 

Membranes used for the pressure driven separation processes, microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF) and reverse osmosis (RO), as well as those used for dialysis, are most commonly made of polymeric materials. Initially most such membranes were cellulosic in nature. These ate now being replaced by polyamide, polysulphone, polycarbonate and several other advanced polymers. These synthetic polymers have improved chemical stability and better resistance to microbial degradation. Membranes have most commonly been produced by a form of phase inversion known as immersion precipitation.11 This process has four main steps ... 

Intensive technologies are derived from the processes used for the treatment of potable water. Chemical methods include chlorination, peracetic acid, ozonation. Ultra-violet irradiation is becoming a popular photo-biochemical process. Membrane filtration processes, particularly the combination microfiltration/ultrafiltra-tion are rapidly developing (Fig. 3). Membrane bioreactors, a relatively new technology, look very promising as they combine the oxidation of the organic matter with microbial decontamination. Each intensive technique is used alone or in combination with another intensive technique or an extensive one. Extensive... 

S-layer ultrafiltration membranes (SUMs) are isoporous structures with very sharp molecular exclusion limits (see Section III.B). SUMs were manufactured by depositing S-layer-carrying cell wall fragments of B. sphaericus CCM 2120 on commercial microfiltration membranes with a pore size up to 1 pm in a pressure-dependent process [73]. Mechanical and chemical resistance of these composite structures could be improved by introducing inter- and intramolecular covalent linkages between the individual S-layer subunits. The uni-... 

Still other types of chemically functional membranes—particularly adsorptive microfiltration membranes containing affinity ligands or other complexants bound to interior pore wall surfaces—are capable of... 

Bertera, R. Steven, H. and Metcalfe, M. The Chemical Engineer, No. 401 (June, 1984). 10. Development studies of crossflow microfiltration. 

Microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) membranes can be used as forms of pretreatment for nanofiltration (ISIF) or reverse osmosis (RO) desalination processes. Membrane pretreatment reduces the amount of chemicals that are required and hence reduces the environmental impact of the final discharge. MF membranes can be used to filter particles with diameters of 0.1-10 pmm and typically remove bacteria, viruses, precipitates, coagulates and large colloidal particles. UF can remove particles with diameters as small as 0.002 pm, and... 

Generally, a distinction can be made between membrane bioreactors based on cells performing a desired conversion and processes based on enzymes. In ceU-based processes, bacteria, plant and mammalian cells are used for the production of (fine) chemicals, pharmaceuticals and food additives or for the treatment of waste streams. Enzyme-based membrane bioreactors are typically used for the degradation of natural polymeric materials Hke starch, cellulose or proteins or for the resolution of optically active components in the pharmaceutical, agrochemical, food and chemical industry [50, 51]. In general, only ultrafiltration (UF) or microfiltration (MF)-based processes have been reported and little is known on the application of reverse osmosis (RO) or nanofiltration (NF) in membrane bioreactors. Additionally, membrane contactor systems have been developed, based on micro-porous polyolefin or teflon membranes [52-55]. 

The liquid waste must be pumpable. Contaminants must be in particulate form, or it must be possible to precipitate dissolved contaminants such as metal ions chemically. Separation must provide an advantage. The EPOC microfiltration technology does not remove volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from liquids. The unit s operation is affected by cold weather. 

Sterilization can be accomplished by several means, including heat, chemicals, radiation (ultraviolet (UV) or y-ray), and microfiltration. Heat is widely used for the sterilization of media and fermentation equipment, while microfiltration, using polymeric microporous membranes, can be performed to sterilize the air and media that might contain heat-sensitive components. Among the various heating methods, moist heat (i.e., steam) is highly effective and very economical for performing the sterilization of fermentation set-ups. 

Microfiltration can be used to replace a clarifier in the chemical clarification of plating discharges. Compared to conventional equipment, it offers the advantages of continuous processing and significantly smaller space requirements. Figure Nine (9) illustrates a microfiltration installation. 

Among the numerous approaches studied so far to minimize such phenomena in ED, it is worth citing pretreatment of the feed solution by coagulation (De Korosy et al., 1970) or microfiltration (MF) or ultrafiltration membrane processing (Ferrarini, 2001 Lewandowski et al., 1999 Pinacci et al., 2004), turbulence in the compartments, optimization of the process conditions, as well as modification of the membrane properties (Grebenyuk et al., 1998). However, all these methods are partially effective and hydraulic or chemical cleaning-in-place (CIP) is still needed today, thus... 

The first major application of microfiltration membranes was for biological testing of water. This remains an important laboratory application in microbiology and biotechnology. For these applications the early cellulose acetate/cellulose nitrate phase separation membranes made by vapor-phase precipitation with water are still widely used. In the early 1960s and 1970s, a number of other membrane materials with improved mechanical properties and chemical stability were developed. These include polyacrylonitrile-poly(vinyl chloride) copolymers, poly(vinylidene fluoride), polysulfone, cellulose triacetate, and various nylons. Most cartridge filters use these membranes. More recently poly(tetrafluo-roethylene) membranes have come into use. 

The fermentation of S. paucimobilis SC 16113 culture was carried out in a 750-liter fermentor. From each fermentation batch, about 60 kg of wet cell paste was collected. Cells harvested from the fermentor were used to conduct the biotransformation in 1-, 10-, and 210-liter preparative batches under aerobic or anaerobic conditions. The cells were suspended in 80 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 6.0) to 20% (w/v, wet cells) concentration. Compound (6) (1-2 g/ liter) and glucose (25 g/liter) were added to the fermentor and the reduction reaction was carried out at 37°C. In some batches, at the end of the fermentation cycle, the cells were concentrated sevenfold by ceramic crossflow microfiltration using a 0.2-pm filter, diafiltered using 10 mM potassium phosphate buffer (pH 7.0), and used directly in the bioreduction process. In all batches of biotransformation, the reaction yield of >85% and the e.e. of >98% were obtained (Table 4). The isolation of compound (7) from the 210-liter preparative batch was carried out to obtain 100 g of product (7). The isolated (7) gave 83% chemical purity and an e.e. of 99.5%. 

---