Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Methods constant comparative method

The analysis was qualitative. Descriptive categories were induetively generated from inspection of data (Merriam, 1998), but they were influenced by our views and our prior knowledge about the characteristics of scientific research. The analyses were done through code and retrieval processes based on the constant comparative method (Strauss Corbin, 1990) and supported by the computer software Atlas.ti. [Pg.251]

The Dissociation Constant of Nitric Acid. The largest value of K in Table 9 is that for the (HS04) ion. In Fig. 36 there is a gap of more than 0.2 electron-volt below the level of the (H30)1 ion. As is well known, several acids exist which in aqueous solution fall iu the intermediate region between the very weak acids and the recognized strong acids the proton levels of these acids will fall in this gap. The values of K for these acids obtained by different methods seldom show close agreement. Results obtained by various methods were compared in 1946 by Redlich,1 who discussed the difficulties encountered. [Pg.138]

Gadduin analysis, Gadduin (method of), this method (Q. J. Exp. Physiol. 40, 49-74, 1955) compares equiactive concentrations of an agonist in the absence and presence of a concentration of noncompetitive antagonist that depresses the maximal agonist response. These are compared in a double reciprocal plot (or variant thereof) to yield the equilibrium dissociation constant of the noncompetitive antagonist-receptor complex (see Chapters 6.4 and 12.2.8). [Pg.279]

The accuracy of a determination may be defined as the concordance between it and the true or most probable value. It follows, therefore, that systematic errors cause a constant error (either too high or too low) and thus affect the accuracy of a result. For analytical methods there are two possible ways of determining the accuracy the so-called absolute method and the comparative method. [Pg.128]

The analytical methods for post-registration control and monitoring purposes submitted by industry to the authorization bodies help the enforcement laboratories. Data requirements from the authorization procedures are constantly compared with the needs of enforcement laboratories, in order to supply them with relevant data, and to avoid the generation of superfluous information. [Pg.36]

In order to assess the accuracy of the present method, we compared it with two other methods. One was the Track Etch detector manufactured by the Terradex Corp. (type SF). Simultaneous measurements with our detectors and the Terradex detectors in 207 locations were made over 10 months. The correlation coefficient between radon concentrations derived from these methods was 0.875, but the mean value by the Terradex method was about twice that by our detectors. The other method used was the passive integrated detector using activated charcoal which is in a canister (Iwata, 1986). After 24 hour exposure, the amount of radon absorbed in the charcoal was measured with Nal (Tl) scintillation counter. The method was calibrated with the grab sampling method using activated charcoal in the coolant and cross-calibrated with other methods. Measurements for comparison with the bare track detector were made in 57 indoor locations. The correlation coefficient between the results by the two methods was 0.323. In the case of comparisons in five locations where frequent measurements with the charcoal method were made or where the radon concentration was approximately constant, the correlation coefficient was 0.996 and mean value by the charcoal method was higher by only 12% than that by the present method. [Pg.187]

In the time constant (relaxation) method, the waveform of P is a negative step which produces a relaxation of the sample temperature from TB + ST to TB. The measure of P(T) may be critical when the power P is comparable with the spurious power or when the thermal conductance G is steeply variable with the temperature (i.e. G oc T3 in the case of contact conductances). [Pg.285]

In the results presented in Table 13.5, the addition of tin affects the kinetic selectivity r differently, depending on the catalyst preparation method. When compared to the monometallic PdO catalyst, r slightly decreases for the coimpregnated PdSn catalyst, but it sharply increases for the PdOSn catalyst prepared via the colloidal oxide synthesis. As the intrinsic kinetic constant rates k do not show significant discrepancies between the different catalysts, the main contribution of the variation of the kinetic selectivity is ascribed to the adsorption constant ratio fBo/ Butenes- In the case of the PdOSn catalyst, formation of but-l-ene is favored compared to its consumption because the X Bo/ Butenes ratio increases, indicating that olefin adsorption is much more destabilized than diene adsorption. Thus, the olefin easily desorbs before being hydrogenated into butane. [Pg.283]

Formulate and solve the kinetics problem with the nominal rate constants and equilibrium constants. Compare the performance of the stiff and nonstiff methods. [Pg.645]

There are many methods of obtaining explosion-limit data. In general, they involve rapid heating of a mixture, rapid mixing at a known temperature, or changing the mixture pressure at a constant temperature. The results are in most cases self-consistent but rarely agree from method to method. Jost 31) discusses most of the methods and compares results obtained with some of them. Here, only those methods most commonly used in kinetics studies are discussed and critically evaluated. [Pg.102]

As commented in Section 2.1, the vertical capillary type of apparatus requires considerable care to set up and operate. A horizontal capillary results in a little more simple apparatus compared to a vertical capillary but in either case there is the extra necessity in the constant pressure method to accurately calibrate the capillary. Generally, the most convenient procedure is to use the constant volume method with an apparatus equipped with modern pressure transducers. [Pg.354]

Quantitative evaluation of a force-distance curve in the non-contact range represents a serious experimental problem, since most of the SFM systems give deflection of the cantilever versus the displacement of the sample, while the experimentalists wants to obtain the surface stress (force per unit contact area) versus tip-sample separation. A few prerequisites have to be met in order to convert deflection into stress and displacement into tip-sample separation. First, the point of primary tip-sample contact has to be determined to derive the separation from the measured deflection of the cantilever tip and the displacement of the cantilever base [382]. Second, the deflection can be converted into the force under assumption that the cantilever is a harmonic oscillator with a certain spring constant. Several methods have been developed for calibration of the spring constant [383,384]. Third, the shape of the probe apex as well as its chemical structure has to be characterised. Spherical colloidal particles of known radius (ca. 10 pm) and composition can be used as force probes because they provide more reliable and reproducible data compared to poorly defined SFM tips [385]. [Pg.125]

A method was proposed to obtain the kinetic rate constant at a fixed temperature with a one-point measurement. This method is comparable to gas-chromato-graphic concentration measurements and can in principle be executed with a convenient gas-chromatograph equipped with a flame ionization detector (FID) [37]. The background of this method is introduced in the following. [Pg.120]

For instance, the glass tube must always be full of solids with a constant flow. To ensure this, the end of each tube was squeezed and the bottom of these tubes were placed at a short distance from a conveyor belt operating at constant speed (5 m min-1), thus gently deposing the mixture as a layer onto the belt. This set up also allows a validation of the method by comparing the sample compositions in the belt to the compositions given by the closest sensor. With this special set up, all particle flow rates become quickly equal from the vibrating channel to the conveyor belt (in fact, the amplitude of the vibrations can be adjusted for this task). [Pg.310]


See other pages where Methods constant comparative method is mentioned: [Pg.126]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.263]    [Pg.441]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.52]    [Pg.417]    [Pg.693]    [Pg.229]    [Pg.274]    [Pg.663]    [Pg.195]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.48]    [Pg.121]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.730]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.352]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.308]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.578]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.214]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.19]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.112 ]




SEARCH



Comparative method

Comparator method

Constant method

© 2024 chempedia.info