Method development execution

A number of computer software packages are available to the analyst to assist in the planning and execution of both method development and validation experiments. The attraction of these systems is that they can automate the validation process from planning the experiment to test execution to the presentation of the data in a final report form. 

Initially, robustness testing was performed to identify potentially important factors, which could affect the results of an interlaboratory study.Therefore, the robustness test was executed at the end of the method validation procedure, just before the interlaboratory study. Flowever, a method found to be non-robust should be redeveloped and revalidated, leading to a waste of time and money. For these economical reasons, nowadays, method robusmess is verified at an earlier stage in the lifetime of the method, i.e., at the end of method development or at the beginning of the validation procedure. ... 

For method development and display of the run status, a flow-chart of the TraceCon preconcentration system is used to visuahze the current system state. During the execution of a method the flow chart displays the current activity of the TraceCon apparatus in the run mode. Run errors can also be easily identified, so that runs can be aborted if parts of the system fail. 

If properly executed, the validation is essentially completed at the conclusion of method development. The experiments that provide confidence to the analytical chemist that the method is suitable are generally the same experiments that a method validation requires. 

An understanding of the mechanisms of solid-phase extraction (SPE) are crucial for effective methods development. The four mechanisms outlined in Chapter 2 are sufficient for the majority of SPE and are an effective set of tools for methods development. The molecule s structure and the sample matrix are the main features used to choose a mechanism of isolation and separation. This chapter will discuss a six-step approach to methods development, how to execute the SPE recovery experiment, troubleshooting and optimizing conditions for the SPE recovery experiment, and how to critically evaluate previously published methods. 

With nonaqueous samples (part B of Fig. 3.8), the decisions for sorbents are somewhat reversed. For example, an analyte that is polar and ionic is best recovered with ion exchange. This example is similar to that of an aqueous sample. If the analyte is polar but nonionic, then the sorbent choice could be reversed phase or normal phase. The choice depends on the organic solvent, either polar or nonpolar, respectively. Finally, if the analyte is nonpolar, the sorbent choice is reversed phase. The second step in methods development is to execute the SPE experiment. Lastly, one has to optimize and troubleshoot the SPE method. 

This approach requires a bit more method development, but it is clearly well worth the effort when the same method needs to be used for thousands or hundreds of thousands of samples. Method development starts with purchasing 6—12 halogenated solvent analogs and empirically measuring (screening) extraction recoveries. Once a high-recovery solvent is found, execution of the cleanup is simple add solvent and mix by pipette, then centrifuge. 

As discussed previously (Sec. II.D.4), acquisition of a quantitative NMR spectrum presupposes careful planning. NMR offers several advantages over other techniques, such as infrared spectroscopy, for the determination of copolymer composition. First, in a truly quantitative NMR spectrum, the relative areas of all peaks are self-consistent, so that if the intensity of peak A is twice that of peak B, it is certain that the number of nuclei contributing to A is double that of B. In other words, there is no NMR equivalent of an extinction coefficient, and precharacterized standards are not needed for method development, if the experiment is properly designed and executed. Second, because of NMR s great sensitivity to subtle structural changes, even chemically similar species can be distinguished. It is, for example, possible to calculate the eoncentration of each pendant-... 

A large variety of new components, new methods of research and testing and advanced possibilities of modelling, together with improved methods of execution on site, create a real development of cement-based materials towards ceramics and high strength composites (Richard and Cheyrezy 1995). 

In this section we discuss a method developed by L.A.M. Nejad at UMIST which substantially reduces the execution time of the chemical models written in FORTRAN over the methods previously used. It also provides some facilities for the editing of reaction schemes, through a FORTRAN program called DELOAD (Differential... 

A general flow chart for partly automated method development is presented in Fig. 2. From this, it is clear that the analyst repeatedly intervenes in order to evaluate intermediate results to steer the direction of development At the outset, according to the available information as well as the experience of the analyst, the chromatographic factors that are to be examined are defined and their limits are delineated. Thereafter, the HPLC system takes over the execution of the necessary experiments and/or the chromatographic runs. The analyst evaluates the runs once they have finished. The number of peaks, and their form, resolution, and sequence are important. As a result, conditions can be hypothesized that should have the highest potential for optimal separation of all of the peaks, or at least of all the relevant ones. 

The validation documentation typically consists of a protocol, analytical data, and a final report. One approach to simplifying validation documentation is to focus on a thorough protocol with preapproved acceptance criteria, which are necessary to determine whether the validation results demonstrate that the method is fit for purpose. In early development, this protocol may be captured in a lab notebook which could be in either a paper or an electronic environment. There is an ever increasing trend in the use of electronic laboratory notebooks which makes it simple to execute previously developed protocols. Later in development, the protocol should be a unique document, which may have data tables to enter the test results, requiring only a short executive summary to summarize the results and a reference or attachment of raw data. A development lab will often use these well-developed and optimized master method validation protocols" " as templates for subsequent validations. A copy of the method procedure and, where available, a method development report may be appended to the validation protocol. In general, the validation protocol should contain the following ... 

In the work specifications for aU major concrete work it is specified that temperature differences in the hardening concrete must be kept within certain limits. Therefore, it is in many cases necessary to make advance calculations of the temperature development in the hardening cross-sections under different conditions, and then, based on this, decide upon a method of execution that safeguards the concrete against crack damages during hardening. In snch calcnlations the data of the adiabatic heat development of the applied concrete are used. 

Standard test methods have been developed for measuring the aforesaid properties. Since the property values are highly dependent on the specimen preparation, equipment, and testing techniques used, it is essential to refer to the appropriate official standard test methods when executing the worL Chapter 2 presents schematically (in simplified form) the bases of many of these standard test methods, according to ASTM and BS 2782 specifications, to indicate broadly the principles involved. 

EIA Preparation is the scientific and objective analysis of the scale, significance and importance of impacts identified. Various methods have been developed, in relation to baseline studies impact identification prediction evaluation and mitigation, to execute this task. 

---