Methane material conversion

Transition metal catalysts, specifically those composed of iron nanoparticles, are widely employed in industrial chemical production and pollution abatement applications [67], Iron also plays a cracial role in many important biological processes. Iron oxides are economical alternatives to more costly catalysts and show activity for the oxidation of methane [68], conversion of carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide [58], and the transformation of various hydrocarbons [69,70]. In addition, iron oxides have good catalytic lifetimes and are resistant to high concentrations of moisture and CO which often poison other catalysts [71]. Li et al. have observed that nanosized iron oxides are highly active for CO oxidation at low tanperatures [58]. Iron is unique and more active than other catalyst and support materials because it is easily reduced and provides a large number of potential active sites because of its highly disordered and defect rich structure [72, 73]. Previous gas-phase smdies of cationic iron clusters have included determination of the thermochemistry and bond energies of iron cluster oxides and iron carbonyl complexes by Armentrout and co-workers [74, 75], and a classification of the dissociation patterns of small iron oxide cluster cations by Schwarz et al. [76]. 

The materials containing La or Ba exhibit high resistance to sintering and maintain a large surface area after calcination. Moreover, the crystal phase of alumina remains unchanged. Nevertheless, Ba and La, which have a strong effect on the thermal stability of alumina material, negatively affect the catalytic properties of supported Pd catalysts in complete oxidation of methane. The conversion of methane over supported Pd catalyst is lower when the support is modified by addition of rare-earth species. 

The calculation model integrates along the reactor in small increments. It maintains a detailed heat and material balance, pressure, methane yield, conversion, volumetric expansion and other factors necessary to calculate a true severity profile. 

Fig. 8.6 Methane catalytic conversion rates along the microreactor during the startup phase for Cases 1 (bottom graph) and 5 (top graph), at 4 time instances ignition (ign), steady state (st) and two intermediate times. Cordierite wall material...

The conversion of coal to gas on an industrial scale dates to the early nineteenth century (14). The gas, often referred to as manufactured gas, was produced in coke ovens or similar types of retorts by simply heating coal to vaporize the volatile constituents. Estimates based on modem data indicate that the gas mixture probably contained hydrogen (qv) (ca 50%), methane (ca 30%), carbon monoxide (qv) and carbon dioxide (qv) (ca 15%), and some inert material, such as nitrogen (qv), from which a heating value of approximately 20.5 MJ/m (550 Btu/fT) can be estimated (6). 

Methane. As our most abundant hydrocarbon, methane offers an attractive source of raw material for organic chemicals (see Hydrocarbons). Successful commercial processes of the 1990s are all based on the intermediate conversion to synthesis gas. An alternative one-step oxidation is potentially very attractive on the basis of simplicity and greater energy efficiency. However, such processes are not yet commercially viable (100). 

Aliphatics. Methane, obtained from cmde oil or natural gas, or as a product from various conversion (cracking) processes, is an important source of raw materials for aliphatic petrochemicals (Fig. 10) (see Hydrocarbons). Ethane, also available from natural gas and cracking processes, is an important source of ethylene, which, in turn, provides more valuable routes to petrochemical products (Fig. 11). 

In principle biomass is a useful fuel for fuel cells many of the technologies discussed above for using biomass as a fuel produce either methane or hydrogen directly and as highlighted below synthesis gas production from biomass for conversion to methanol is an attractive option. Cellulose-based material may be converted to a mixture of hydrogen (70% hydrogen content recovered), CO2 and methane by high-temperature treatment with a nickel catalyst. 

Direct conversion of methane to ethane and ethylene (C2 hydrocarbons) has a large implication towards the utilization of natural gas in the gas-based petrochemical and liquid fuels industries [ 1 ]. CO2 OCM process provides an alternative route to produce useful chemicals and materials where the process utilizes CO2 as the feedstock in an environmentally-benefiting chemical process. Carbon dioxide rather than oxygen seems to be an alternative oxidant as methyl radicals are induced in the presence of oxygen. Basicity, reducibility, and ability of catalyst to form oxygen vacancies are some of the physico-chemical criteria that are essential in designing a suitable catalyst for the CO2 OCM process [2]. The synergism between catalyst reducibility and basicity was reported to play an important role in the activation of the carbon dioxide and methane reaction [2]. 

In the phosphoric acid fuel cell as currently practiced, a premium (hydrogen rich) hydrocarbon (e.g. methane) fuel is steam reformed to produce a hydrogen feedstock to the cell stack for direct (electrochemical) conversion to electrical energy. At the fuel electrode, hydrogen ionization is accomplished by use of a catalytic material (e.g. Pt, Pd, or Ru) to form solvated protons. 

While alkane metathesis is noteworthy, it affords lower homologues and especially methane, which cannot be used easily as a building block for basic chemicals. The reverse reaction, however, which would incorporate methane, would be much more valuable. Nonetheless, the free energy of this reaction is positive, and it is 8.2 kj/mol at 150 °C, which corresponds to an equihbrium conversion of 13%. On the other hand, thermodynamic calculation predicts that the conversion can be increased to 98% for a methane/propane ratio of 1250. The temperature and the contact time are also important parameters (kinetic), and optimal experimental conditions for a reaction carried in a continuous flow tubiflar reactor are as follows 300 mg of [(= SiO)2Ta - H], 1250/1 methane/propane mixture. Flow =1.5 mL/min, P = 50 bars and T = 250 °C [105]. After 1000 min, the steady state is reached, and 1.88 moles of ethane are produced per mole of propane consmned, which corresponds to a selectivity of 96% selectivity in the cross-metathesis reaction (Fig. 4). The overall reaction provides a route to the direct transformation of methane into more valuable hydrocarbon materials. 

When the temperature of a carbonate reservoir that is saturated with high-viscosity oil and water increases to 200° C or more, chemical reactions occur in the formation, resulting in the formation of considerable amounts of CO2. The generation of CO2 during thermal stimulation of a carbonate reservoir results from the dealkylation of aromatic hydrocarbons in the presence of water vapor, catalytic conversion of hydrocarbons by water vapor, and oxidation of organic materials. Clay material and metals of variable valence (e.g., nickel, cobalt, iron) in the carbonate rock can serve as the catalyst. An optimal amount of CO2 exists for which maximal oil recovery is achieved [1538]. The performance of a steamflooding process can be improved by the addition of CO2 or methane [1216]. 

Methane Conversion. Proceedings of a Symposium on the Production of Fuels and Chemicals from Natural Gas, Auckland, April 27-30, 1987 edited by D.M. Bibby, C.D. Chang, R.F. Howe and S. Yurchak Innovation in Zeolite Materials Science. Proceedings of an International Symposium, Nieuwpoort, September 13-17, 1987... 

At Brookhaven National Laboratory in the 1980s, a two-step process was described for the coproduction of hydrogen and carbon, with methane being the intermediate see Steinberg.107108 In the first step, carbonaceous material is hydrogasified to methane with a subsequent thermal decomposition of the methane to hydrogen and carbon. In the process, water is also formed from the oxygen present in the fuel. A typical overall conversion of biomass, as reported by Milne et al.,5 would be... 

Most of the test methods used to assess the anaerobic biodegradability of organic chemicals have been screening level tests based upon measuring the increase in gas volume or pressure resulting from the conversion of a test material to carbon dioxide (C02) and methane (CH4), such as the ECETOC-28 test [3,4],... 

---