Measurement endpoint, definition

Direct comparison of IBI scores lends itself to misinterpretation and misuse. It is entirely possible that a regulatory endpoint could be defined by an IBI measurement score of 55 using IBI. Unfortunately, this definition leads to many possible species compositions, and the score is dependent on the assignment of values during the development of the IBI. It would be better to specify just the features of the aquatic system deemed valuable along with target populations as measurement endpoints. 

The ecotoxicological data selected for developing soil invertebrate-based ETVs that can be proposed as screening concentrations for RDX, HMX, CL-20, TNT, 2,4-DNT, 2,6-DNT, and TNB are summarized in Table 12.3. These toxicity benchmark values were established in definitive tests with the soil invertebrates earthworm Eisenia fetida [33], potworm Enchytraeus crypticus [34], and collembola Folsomia Candida [35], These species are representative surrogates of species that normally inhabit a wide range of site soils and geographical areas. Reproduction measurement endpoints in these tests were more sensitive compared with adult survival [24-28,31] and were consequently used for derivation of proposed soil invertebrate-based ETVs. These endpoints included cocoon production and juvenile production for earthworms, and juvenile production for potworms and collembola. 

One very simplistic way of handling missing data is to remove those patients with missing data from the analysis in a complete cases analysis or completers analysis. By definition this will be a per-protocol analysis which will omit all patients who do not provide a measure on the primary endpoint and will of course be subject to bias. Such an analysis may well be acceptable in an exploratory setting where we may be looking to get some idea of the treatment effect if every subject were to follow the protocol perfectly, but it would not be acceptable in a confirmatory setting as a primary analysis. 

Among these methods, multicalibration (multivariate Calibration) is important. Multicalibration is the final development of indirect analytical methods. The analytical method has been previously defined as the whole of operational steps (reactions, separations,.. .) that lead to a highly selective endpoint where one measured physical variable is univocally related to one chemical variable (quantity, concentration,... ) this correlation is shown by the calibration curve (a straight line, generally). Multicalibration brinp a complete change of this definition the analytical method is the whole of chemical and mathematical operations that enable us to reach a multivariate selective system where several measured physical quantities are univocally related to several chemical quantities the correlation is shown by the calibration hypersurface. Multicalibration is surely destined to used with great effect in many areas in the future. 

A quantitative test for the determination of anti-insulin antibodies is not possible due to the different nature of insulin antibodies that can be formed. The criteria for evaluation of antibody positive samples are somewhat arbitrary, e.g. selected pool of healthy blood donors, definition of mean + 3 standard deviations, varying binding with different tracer batches, consider an absolute change in binding values > 10 % B/T in clinical studies from baseline to endpoint when measured in the same ran as significant. 

MRLs are, by definition (Chou et al. 1998), substance-specific and do not include effects attributable to interaction (whether additive, synergistic, or antagonistic) with other chemicals or environmental substances. Their relevance to the mission of ATSDR is to assist public health officials in the identification of chemicals/elements of potential health concern at hazardous waste sites. The ATSDR MRL is not intended to be used in the regulatory or site clean-up process, but is instead intended to serve as a basis of comparison with actual measured levels of environmental exposure. Further, the role of informed biomedical judgment is crucial in the application of any MRL, or the media-specific health guidance values (HGVs) derived from them, in any given exposure scenario (Risher and De Rosa 1997). MRLs for a particular substance are based upon the most sensitive effect/endpoint in that portion of the human population considered to be most susceptible to injury from exposure to that substance. Thus, the... 

We can make similar definitions and calculations concerning acidity measurements. For a water in which acidity is contributed solely by and carbonate species, the endpoint of the total acidity titration is at a pH where a stoichiometric amount of OH has been added to complete the following three reactions ... 

In this chapter we will follow the structure suggested by the OECD recommendations. We will review the development of measures of goodness of fit, robustness, assessment of predictability for continuous models and models for classified endpoints, and the definition of domains of applicability. The aim is not to provide a comprehensive summary of all papers in this field, but to provide key references that have influenced the author s continuing journey to becoming a better QSAR scientist. 

---