Magnitude of surface tension

If the ratio of surface to volume of the system is very large, the surface energy shows up willy nilly. We can calculate the size of particle for which the surface energy will contribute, let us say 1 % of the total energy. We write the energy in the form, 

---

In industry, the magnitude of surface tension can be monitored with the help of bubble pressure. Air bubbles are pumped through a capillary into the solution, and the pressure measured is calibrated to known surface tension solutions. Using a suitable computer, one can then estimate surface tension values very accurately. Commercial apparatus are also available to monitor surface tension. 

The magnitude of surface tension change will depend on the concentration and the solute added. In some cases, the surface tension (y) of the solution (such as NaCl) increases. The change in y may be small (per mole added) (as in the case of inorganic salts) or large (as in the case of such molecules as ethanol or other soap-like molecules) with the addition of solute (equal gram per liter) ... 

The surface tension of water increases from 72 to 73 mN/m when 1 M NaCl is added. On the other hand, the magnitude of surface tension decreases from 72 to 39 mN/m when only 0.008 M (0.008 M x 288 = 2.3 g/L) SDS (mol. wt. = 288) is dissolved. It thus becomes obvious, that in all those systems in which surface tension plays an important role, the additives will become significant. The data for n-butanol solutions in water are shown to decrease from 72 mN/m (pure water) to 50 mN/M in 200 mmol/L (Figure 3.2). 

The magnitude of surface tension is reduced since the hydrophobic alkyl chain or group is energetically more attracted to the surface than being surrounded by water molecules inside the bulk aqueous phase. Figure 3.5 shows the monolayer formation of the surface-active substance at a high bulk concentration. Since the closely packed... 

Both in industry and research, large data are manipulated that could be systemized. Understanding the chemistry and physics of liquid surfaces is important so as to describe interfacial forces as a function of temperature and pressure. The magnitude of surface tension, y, decreases almost linearly with temperature (t) within a narrow range (Birdi, 2002, 2008 Defay et at, 1966) ... 

The magnitude of surface tension, y, is determined by the internal forces in the liquid thus it will be related to the internal energy or cohesive energy. The surface tension or the capillary phenomenon was mentioned in the literature at a very early stage by Leonardo da Vinci. 

The magnitude of surface tension, y, has also been calculated from statistical theory and molecular orientations at the free surface in nematic liquid crystals. ... 

Magnitudes of Surface Tension, y (mN/m) and Surface Entropy for Different Liquids... 

Water-electrolyte mixtures The example of water-NaCl shows that the magnitude of surface tension increases linearly from 72 to 80 mN/m for 0- to 5-M NaCl solution (djid mol NaCl =1.6 mN/mol NaCl) ... 

It is seen that increase in y per mol added NaCl is much larger than that for NH4NO3. In general, the magnitude of surface tension of water increases on the addition of electrolytes, with a very few exceptions. This indicates that the magnitude of the surface... 

Ethanol-water mixtnres and hydrogen bonding The ethanol-water mixture is known to be the most extensively investigated system. The addition of even small amounts of ethanol to water gives rise to contraction in volnme.5 A remarkable decrease of the partial molar volnme of ethanol with a minimnm at an ethanol molar fraction of 0.08 was observed. The same behavior is observed from heat-of-mixing data. The surface tension drops rather appreciably when 10 to 20% ethanol is present, while the magnitude of surface tension slowly approaches that of the pnre ethanol. 

The surface area model for solubility in water or any solvent can be further investigated by measuring the effect of temperature or added salt. Preliminary measurements indicate that some of the above models are not satisfactory. We find that the solubility of butanol in water decreases while the magnitude of surface tension of aqueous NaCl solution increases. These kinds of data are important for such systems as EOR (enhanced oil recovery). 

These systems also provide an understanding of the molecular basis of interfaces, since the amphiphile molecules consist of alkyl chains and hydrophilic groups. Thermodynamic analyses on surface adsorption and micelle formation of a anionic surfactants in water were described by surface tension (drop volume) measurements. These data are analyzed in Table 3.19. These data show that at 20°C (Table 3.20) the magnitude of surface tension changes nonlinearly (varying from 1.7 to 0.7 mN/m per CH2) with alkyl chain length. 

The role of surface elasticity provided by the adsorbed layer of surfactant molecules remains the same in aqueous and nonpolar foams, however, its relative importance and effectiveness is different. A major difference lies in the magnitude of surface tension gradient that can be generated by the surface-active chemicals. Because the surface tension of pure water is very high (73 mN/m), many surfactants can lower the surface tension by more than 50 mN/m. The surface tension of nonpolar solvents is typically around 25 to 30 mN/m. Therefore, even the best surfactants can only provide a much smaller reduction in its value. 

Because of the limited magnitude of surface tension gradients and absence of electric double-layer effects, the stabilization of foams in nonpolar liquids requires other ways of retarding the thinning of foam lamellae. These include the high liquid-phase viscosity that has been discussed earlier and increased surface viscosity because of presence of highly viscous or even rigid liquid-crystal films. 

A rough estimate of the magnitude of surface tension can be made by assuming that the surface work is of the same magnitude as the heat of sublimation, since sublimation continually creates a new surface. For many metals the heat of sublimation is in the range of 10 cal/mole (4.18 X 10 J/mole). Using a units-conver-sion table, one obtains 10 x 6.94 x = 6.94 x 10 J/atom = 6.94 x... 

Figure 4.1-5. Magnitude of surface tension as a function of buffer, DNA, and protein (BSA) concentration [40].

Let us now return to the question of whether we can calculate the surface energies of polymers from first principles. The rough estimates in section 2.1 tell us correctly the order of magnitude of surface tensions and correctly draw attention to the intimate connection between surface energies and the cohesive forces in liquids, but they have a number of drawbacks. Firstly, temperature makes no appearance in these theories, despite the experimental fact that surface tensions depend quite strongly on temperature. Secondly, we have assumed that the density of the liquid near the surface is the same as the bulk density. These shortcomings are seen at their most extreme if we consider a liquid near the liquid-vapour critical point. Here the distinction between liquid and vapour vanishes completely the surface tension of the liquid approaches zero and the system becomes in effect all interface. An improved theory of surface tension must be able to accoxmt for these phenomena, at least qualitatively. 

Since it is commonly (5) held that the occurrence and magnitude of surface tension gradients (Marangoni effects), whether due to spatial variations in temperature or concentration or compression/ expans ion of the interface, are important to many colloid problems, some consideration has been given to methods of determining the dilatational rheological parameters. 

Temperature Dependence and Order of Magnitude of Surface Tension... 

In the literature, one finds a variety of methods used to measure the magnitude of surface tension of liquids. This arises from the fact that one needs a specific method for each situation, which one may use in the measurement of y. For example, if the liquid is water (at room temperature), then the method will be different than if the system is molten metal (at very high temperature, ca. 500°C or higher). In the oil reservoirs, one finds oil at high temperature (over 80°C) and pressures (over 200 atm). In many cases, one has developed specific instruments that allow one to measure the magnitude of surface tension under the given situation (Adamson and Gast, 1997 Birdi, 2009). 

At this stage, it is important to consider how the magnitude of surface tension of different molecules changes with respect to the molecular structure (Table 1.2). Extensive studies are found that attempt to correlate surface tension to other physicochemical properties of liquids, such as boiling point, heat of evaporation, etc. This concept has been extensively analyzed in the literature (Birdi, 2010a Jasper, 1972). In research and other applications where the surface tension of Uqnids plays an important role, it is necessary to be able to predict the magnitude of y of different kinds of molecules. 

This example shows how very basic information such as knowledge of the order of magnitude of surface tension can be very useful. Even when using commercial process simulators we must be rather careful. Estimation methods are useful when we lack data, but common sense is equally important. Estimation methods are discussed in Section 3.4. 

We now come to the question of the mechanism of the magnitude of surface tension and interfacial tension. The magnitudes of surface tensions of molten materials are much greater than for organic liquids. This can be observed in mercury with its ready breakup into drops. Hildebrand and Scott [3] have described the surface tension k of pure liquids and its relation to the solubility parameter of non polar liquids. They suggest the correlation... 

---