Losses, fuel cells

Because of these losses, fuel cells generate significant heat, and this places a limit on the maximum power available because it is very difficult to provide adequate cooling to avoid formation of potentially... 

Not only is the conversion of stored energy in fuels such as coal and gas an inherently low-efficiency process, but also running electricity long distances over the grid is extremely wasteful, with substantial transmission losses. Fuel cells can offer about twice that overall efficiency."... 

In the previous sections, we looked into the losses in the fuel cell potential contributed by the resistance to the reaction kinetics at the cathode and anode (activation losses), resistance to ion or electron transport (ohmic losses), and the mass concentration variation near the electrode (mass transfer losses). In addition to these losses, fuel cells show significant potential losses as a result of a short circuit in the electrolyte and crossover of reactants through the electrolyte. 

As can be seen from Eigure 11b, the output voltage of a fuel cell decreases as the electrical load is increased. The theoretical polarization voltage of 1.23 V/cell (at no load) is not actually realized owing to various losses. Typically, soHd polymer electrolyte fuel cells operate at 0.75 V/cell under peak load conditions or at about a 60% efficiency. The efficiency of a fuel cell is a function of such variables as catalyst material, operating temperature, reactant pressure, and current density. At low current densities efficiencies as high as 75% are achievable. 

Solid Oxide Fuel Cell In SOF(7s the electrolyte is a ceramic oxide ion conductor, such as vttriurn-doped zirconium oxide. The conduetKity of this material is 0.1 S/ern at 1273 K (1832°F) it decreases to 0.01 S/ern at 1073 K (1472°F), and by another order of magnitude at 773 K (932°F). Because the resistive losses need to be kept below about 50 rn, the operating temperature of the... 

As of 2000, it also looks as though more and more electric utilities are becoming interested in fuel cell stacks as local microgenerators to top up power from large power stations, without the need for long-distance transmission of electricity and its attendant expense and power losses. 

Reactions (3.9) to (3.11) proceed rapidly to equilibrium in most anodic solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) environments and thus H2 (Eq. 3.8) rather than CH4 is oxidized electrochemically resulting in low polarization losses. Upon doubling the stoichiometric coefficients of equation (3.8), summing equations (3.8) to (3.11) and dividing the resulting coefficients by two one obtains ... 

Interestingly, the PEMFC may also operate directly on methanol. Naturally, the problems associated with high coverage of various intermediates will be present, as mentioned above, as well as additional problems such as loss of methanol over the membrane. Nevertheless, it is possible to operate a methanol fuel cell with a voltage around 0.4 V and a reasonable current, to power small mobile devices such as portable computers and cell phones and make them independent of connection to the conventional power net. For more details on fuel cells we refer the reader to L. Carr-ette, K.A. Friedrich and U. Stimming, Fuel Cells 1(1) (2001) 5-39. 

In practice the situation is less favorable due to losses associated with overpotentials in the cell and the resistance of the membrane. Overpotential is an electrochemical term that, basically, can be seen as the usual potential energy barriers for the various steps of the reactions. Therefore, the practical efficiency of a fuel cell is around 40-60 %. For comparison, the Carnot efficiency of a modern turbine used to generate electricity is of order of 50 %. It is important to realize, though, that the efficiency of Carnot engines is in practice limited by thermodynamics, while that of fuel cells is largely set by material properties, which may be improved. 

Reduction of trichloroethene to ethane took place in a modified fuel cell to which was introduced, although the loss of catalytic activity with time could present a serious limitation (Ju et al. 2006). 

Eickes C, Piela P, Davey J, Zelenay P. 2006. Recoverable cathode performance loss in direct methanol fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc 153 A171-A178. 

One of the critical issues with regard to low temperamre fuel cells is the gradual loss of performance due to the degradation of the cathode catalyst layer under the harsh operating conditions, which mainly consist of two aspects electrochemical surface area (ECA) loss of the carbon-supported Pt nanoparticles and corrosion of the carbon support itself. Extensive studies of cathode catalyst layer degradation in phosphoric acid fuel cells (PAECs) have shown that ECA loss is mainly caused by three mechanisms ... 

Wilson MS, Garzon FH, Sickafus KE, Gottesfeld S. 1993. Surface area loss of supported platinum in polymer electrolyte fuel cells. J Electrochem Soc 140 2872-2877. 

Such bimetallic alloys display higher tolerance to the presence of methanol, as shown in Fig. 11.12, where Pt-Cr/C is compared with Pt/C. However, an increase in alcohol concentration leads to a decrease in the tolerance of the catalyst [Koffi et al., 2005 Coutanceau et ah, 2006]. Low power densities are currently obtained in DMFCs working at low temperature [Hogarth and Ralph, 2002] because it is difficult to activate the oxidation reaction of the alcohol and the reduction reaction of molecular oxygen at room temperature. To counterbalance the loss of performance of the cell due to low reaction rates, the membrane thickness can be reduced in order to increase its conductance [Shen et al., 2004]. As a result, methanol crossover is strongly increased. This could be detrimental to the fuel cell s electrical performance, as methanol acts as a poison for conventional Pt-based catalysts present in fuel cell cathodes, especially in the case of mini or micro fuel cell applications, where high methanol concentrations are required (5-10 M). 

For isolating the overpotential of the working electrode, it is common practice to admit hydrogen to the counter-electrode (the anode in a PEMFC the cathode in a direct methanol fuel cell, DMFC) and create a so-called dynamic reference electrode. Furthermore, the overpotential comprises losses associated with sluggish electrochemical kinetics, as well as a concentration polarization related to hindered mass transport ... 

Summing up this section, we would like to note that understanding size effects in electrocatalysis requires the application of appropriate model systems that on the one hand represent the intrinsic properties of supported metal nanoparticles, such as small size and interaction with their support, and on the other allow straightforward separation between kinetic, ohmic, and mass transport (internal and external) losses and control of readsorption effects. This requirement is met, for example, by metal particles and nanoparticle arrays on flat nonporous supports. Their investigation allows unambiguous access to reaction kinetics and control of catalyst structure. However, in order to understand how catalysts will behave in the fuel cell environment, these studies must be complemented with GDE and MEA tests to account for the presence of aqueous electrolyte in model experiments. 

---