Liquids reaction kinetics

Developed by Freeman and Tavlarides [45,46], and based on the liquid jet technique [47,48], the LJRR provides a method of measuring liquid-liquid reaction kinetics with direct contact, known interfacial area, renewable interface, and reasonably defined hydrodynamics. This method operates by employing an aqueous liquid jet in a concurrent, coaxially flowing organic solution, shown schematically in Fig. 8. 

Our own dynamic experiments for the determination of the gas-liquid-reaction kinetics have been performed in a stirred-cell reactor (Fig. 9.6). After thermodynamic equilibrium is reached inside the reactor, the gas is introduced rapidly and the pressure decrease recorded as a function of time. From this course, the reaction rate constant at the respective temperature can be obtained. 

However, a note of caution should be added. In many multiphase reaction systems, rates of mass transfer between different phases can be just as important or more important than reaction kinetics in determining the reactor volume. Mass transfer rates are generally higher in gas-phase than liquid-phase systems. In such situations, it is not so easy to judge whether gas or liquid phase is preferred. 

Several instniments have been developed for measuring kinetics at temperatures below that of liquid nitrogen [81]. Liquid helium cooled drift tubes and ion traps have been employed, but this apparatus is of limited use since most gases freeze at temperatures below about 80 K. Molecules can be maintained in the gas phase at low temperatures in a free jet expansion. The CRESU apparatus (acronym for the French translation of reaction kinetics at supersonic conditions) uses a Laval nozzle expansion to obtain temperatures of 8-160 K. The merged ion beam and molecular beam apparatus are described above. These teclmiques have provided important infonnation on reactions pertinent to interstellar-cloud chemistry as well as the temperature dependence of reactions in a regime not otherwise accessible. In particular, infonnation on ion-molecule collision rates as a ftmction of temperature has proven valuable m refining theoretical calculations. 

As it has appeared in recent years that many hmdamental aspects of elementary chemical reactions in solution can be understood on the basis of the dependence of reaction rate coefficients on solvent density [2, 3, 4 and 5], increasing attention is paid to reaction kinetics in the gas-to-liquid transition range and supercritical fluids under varying pressure. In this way, the essential differences between the regime of binary collisions in the low-pressure gas phase and tliat of a dense enviromnent with typical many-body interactions become apparent. An extremely useful approach in this respect is the investigation of rate coefficients, reaction yields and concentration-time profiles of some typical model reactions over as wide a pressure range as possible, which pemiits the continuous and well controlled variation of the physical properties of the solvent. Among these the most important are density, polarity and viscosity in a contimiiim description or collision frequency. 

It follows from this discussion that all of the transport properties can be derived in principle from the simple kinetic dreoty of gases, and their interrelationship tlu ough k and c leads one to expect that they are all characterized by a relatively small temperature coefficient. The simple theory suggests tlrat this should be a dependence on 7 /, but because of intermolecular forces, the experimental results usually indicate a larger temperature dependence even up to for the case of molecular inter-diffusion. The Anhenius equation which would involve an enthalpy of activation does not apply because no activated state is involved in the transport processes. If, however, the temperature dependence of these processes is fitted to such an expression as an algebraic approximation, tlren an activation enthalpy of a few kilojoules is observed. It will thus be found that when tire kinetics of a gas-solid or liquid reaction depends upon the transport properties of the gas phase, the apparent activation entlralpy will be a few kilojoules only (less than 50 kJ). 

Yagi, H., 1986. Kinetics of solid production accompanying gas-liquid reaction. Proceedings of World Congress III Chemical Engineering, Tokyo, 4, 20-23. 

Entelis, S.G. Tiger, R.P. Reaction Kinetics in the Liquid Phase Wiley (Halsted) New York, 1976. 

The purpose of this section is to present a general theoretical model of gas-liquid-particle operations, with a number of simplifying assumptions that make possible, at least in principle, the calculation of the conversion and yield from a specified amount of information regarding transport phenomena and reaction kinetics. 

The experimental and theoretical work reported in the literature will be reviewed for each of the five major types of ga s-liquid-particle operation under the headings Mass transfer across gas-liquid interface mass transfer across liquid-solid interface holdup and axial dispersion of gas phase holdup and axial dispersion of liquid phase heat transfer reaction kinetics. 

Since the free energy of a molecule in the liquid phase is not markedly different from that of the same species volatilized, the variation in the intrinsic reactivity associated with the controlling step in a solid—liquid process is not expected to be very different from that of the solid—gas reaction. Interpretation of kinetic data for solid—liquid reactions must, however, always consider the possibility that mass transfer in the homogeneous phase of reactants to or products from, the reaction interface is rate-limiting [108,109], Kinetic aspects of solid—liquid reactions have been discussed by Taplin [110]. 

For the exchanges carried out in liquid ammonia, kinetic isotope effects kD kT of 2.3-2.5 have been obtained for reaction of benzene, toluene, and naphthalene and for the reactions of the 2 positions of furan and thiophene with -butoxide in dimethyl sulphoxide somewhat lower values, 1.5 and 1.3, respectively, were obtained591, but whether this was a solvent or a substituent effect is not apparent from the data. 

Solution of the design equations for liquid-phase piston flow reactors is usually easier than for gas-phase reactors because pressure t5q)icaUy has no effect on the fluid density or the reaction kinetics. Extreme pressures are an exception that theoretically can be handled by the same methods used for gas-phase systems. The difficulty will be finding an equation of state. For ordinary pressures, the... 

OS 63] [R 27] [R 18] [P 46] Using a slit-type interdigital micro mixer prior to a liquid/liquid reaction system improves the conversion to 80%, hence close to the kinetic limits [117]. This is an improvement over using a microgrid in front of the reactor (see the Section Conversion/selectivity/yield - benchmarking to batch processing/kinetics, above). 

The catalyst concentration can be varied in a wide range for the above-mentioned parameter set, without changing the reaction kinetics [9]. Since gas/liquid micro reactors span a broad range of residence times, typically much shorter than for conventional apparatus, this allows a flexible adaptation of the test procedure to the needs of micro flow characterization. 

Table 5.4-3 summarizes the design equations and analytical relations between concentration, C/(, and batch time, t, or residence time, t, for a homogeneous reaction A —> products with simple reaction kinetics (Van Santen etal., 1999). Balance equations for multicomponent homogeneous systems for any reaction network and for gas-liquid and gas-liquid-solid systems are presented in Tables 5.4-7 and 5.4.8 at the end of Section 5.4.3. 

Semibatch reactors are often used to mn highly exothermic reactions isothermally, to run gas-liquid(-solid) processes isobarically, and to prevent dangerous accumulation of some reactants in the reaction mixture. Contrary to batch of)eration, temperature and pressure in semibatch reactors can be varied independently. The liquid reaction mixture can be considered as ideally mixed, while it is assumed that the introduced gas flows up like a piston (certainly this is not entirely true). Kinetic modelling of semibatch experiments is as difficult as that of batch, non-isotherma experiments. 

Hydrodynamic Techniques for Investigating Reaction Kinetics at Liquid-Liquid Interfaces Historical Overview and Recent Developments... 

Although the Lewis cell was introduced over 50 years ago, and has several drawbacks, it is still used widely to study liquid-liquid interfacial kinetics, due to its simplicity and the adaptable nature of the experimental setup. For example, it was used recently to study the hydrolysis kinetics of -butyl acetate in the presence of a phase transfer catalyst [21]. Modeling of the system involved solving mass balance equations for coupled mass transfer and reactions for all of the species involved. Further recent applications of modified Lewis cells have focused on stripping-extraction kinetics [22-24], uncatalyzed hydrolysis [25,26], and partitioning kinetics [27]. 

A growing-drop method has been reported [53] for measuring interfacial liquid-liquid reactions, in which mass transport to the growing drop was considered to be well-defined and calculable. This approach was applied to study the kinetics of the solvent extraction of cupric ions by complexing ligands. 

Stirred suspensions of droplets have proven to be a popular approach for studying the kinetics of liquid-liquid reactions [54-57]. The basic principle is that one liquid phase takes the form of droplets in the other phase when two immiscible liquids are dispersed. The droplet size can be controlled by changing the agitator speed. For droplets with a diameter < 0.15 cm the inside of the drop is essentially stagnant [54], so that mass transfer to the inside surface of the droplet occurs only by diffusion. In many cases, this technique can lack the necessary control over both the interfacial area and the transport step for determination of fundamental interfacial processes [3], but is still of some value as it reproduces conditions in industrial reactors. 

This review has highlighted the wide range of techniques, which have been used to investigate reaction kinetics at liquid-liquid interfaces. While significant progress has been made in the last few years, in particular, many of the techniques currently in use have a number of drawbacks, and there is considerable scope for the introduction of further techniques which can match the criteria proposed in Section I. 

MEMED meets all of the criteria listed in Section I, for the investigation of liquid-liquid interfacial kinetics, but is limited in the range of rate constants that can be determined. While SECM, discussed in Chapter 12, enhances the kinetic domain that can be measured with ultramicroelectrodes, there are many spontaneous reactions to which SECM cannot be applied. 

Romanainen, J.J and Salmi T (1992) The Effect of Reaction Kinetics, Mass Transfer and Flow Pattern on Noncatalytic and Homogeneously Catalyzed Gas-Liquid Reactions in Bubble Columns, Chem Eng Sci, 47 2493. 

Our data can be used to estimate the effective temperatures reached in each site through comparative rate thermometry, a technique developed for similar use in shock tube chemistry (32). Using the sonochemical kinetic data in combination with the activation parameters recently determined by high temperature gas phase laser pyrolysis (33), the effective temperature of each site can then be calculated (8),(34) the gas phase reaction zone effective temperature is 5200 650°K, and the liquid phase effective temperature is 1900°K. Using a simple thermal conduction model, the liquid reaction zone is estimated to be 200 nm thick and to have a lifetime of less than 2 usee, as shown in Figure 3. 

---