Reaction interface

M. Grunze and H. J. Kreuzer, eds.. Kinetics of Interface Reactions, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1987. 

Auerbaoh D J and Rettner C T 1987 Preoursor states, myth or reaiity a perspeotive from moieouiar beam studies Kinetics of Interface Reactions ed M Grunze and H J Kreuzer (Beriin Springer) p 125... 

On firings the gases from the propellant accelerate the piston that compresses the light gas in front of it. At a preestablished pressure, the projectile is propelled down the launch tube accelerated by the low molecular weight gas which follows the projectile to the mouth of the tube. The target material is placed in front of the launch tube, and appropriate instmmentation used to estabUsh the characteristics of the interface reaction between projectile and target (117-120). 

Recent applications of e-beam and HF-plasma SNMS have been published in the following areas aerosol particles [3.77], X-ray mirrors [3.78, 3.79], ceramics and hard coatings [3.80-3.84], glasses [3.85], interface reactions [3.86], ion implantations [3.87], molecular beam epitaxy (MBE) layers [3.88], multilayer systems [3.89], ohmic contacts [3.90], organic additives [3.91], perovskite-type and superconducting layers [3.92], steel [3.93, 3.94], surface deposition [3.95], sub-surface diffusion [3.96], sensors [3.97-3.99], soil [3.100], and thermal barrier coatings [3.101]. 

In general, for decreasing interface reactions, the rate coefficients ft, and the exponent, n, are dependent on particle dimensions and shape... 

A reaction interface is the zone immediately adjoining the surface of contact between reactant and product and within which bond redistributions occur. Prevailing conditions are different from those characteristic of the reactant bulk as demonstrated by the enhanced reactivity, usually attributed to local strain, catalysis by products, etc. Considerable difficulties attend investigation of the mechanisms of interface reactions because this thin zone is interposed between two relatively much larger particles. Accordingly, many proposed reaction models are necessarily based on indirect evidence. Without wishing to appear unnecessarily pessimistic, we consider it appropriate to mention here some of the problems inherent in the provision of detailed mechanisms for solid phase rate processes. These difficulties are not always apparent in interpretations and proposals appearing in the literature. 

Dehydration reactions are typically both endothermic and reversible. Reported kinetic characteristics for water release show various a—time relationships and rate control has been ascribed to either interface reactions or to diffusion processes. Where water elimination occurs at an interface, this may be characterized by (i) rapid, and perhaps complete, initial nucleation on some or all surfaces [212,213], followed by advance of the coherent interface thus generated, (ii) nucleation at specific surface sites [208], perhaps maintained during reaction [426], followed by growth or (iii) (exceptionally) water elimination at existing crystal surfaces without growth [62]. 

There have been few satisfactory demonstrations that decompositions of hydrides, carbides and nitrides proceed by interface reactions, i.e. either nucleation and growth or contracting volume mechanisms. Kinetic studies have not usually been supplemented by microscopic observations and this approach is not easily applied to carbides, where the product is not volatile. The existence of a sigmoid a—time relation is not, by itself, a proof of the occurrence of a nucleation and growth process since an initial slow, or very slow, process may represent the generation of an active surface, e.g. poison removal, or the production of an equilibrium concentration of adsorbed intermediate. The reactions included below are, therefore, tentative classifications based on kinetic indications of interface-type processes, though in most instances this mechanistic interpretation would benefit from more direct experimental support. 

Summary of kinetic characteristics for decompositions of some metal hydrides (interface reactions)... 

Another possibility is that one of the reactants is particularly mobile, this is apparent in certain solid—gas reactions, such as the reduction of NiO with hydrogen, which is a well-characterized nucleation and growth process [30,1166]. Attempts have been made to use the kinetic equations developed for interface reactions to elucidate the mechanisms of reactions between the crystalline components of rocks under conditions of natural metamorphism [1167,1168]. 

The catalytic activity of doped nickel oxide on the solid state decomposition of CsN3 decreased [714] in the sequence NiO(l% Li) > NiO > NiO(l% Cr) > uncatalyzed reaction. While these results are in qualitative accordance with the assumption that the additive provided electron traps, further observations, showing that ZnO (an rc-type semi-conductor) inhibited the reaction and that CdO (also an rc-type semi-conductor) catalyzed the reaction, were not consistent with this explanation. It was noted, however, that both NiO and CdO could be reduced by the product caesium metal, whereas ZnO is not, and that the reaction with NiO yielded caesium oxide, which is identified as the active catalyst. Detailed kinetic data for these rate processes are not available but the pattern of behaviour described clearly demonstrates that the interface reactions were more complicated than had been anticipated. 

Two product barrier layers are formed and the continuation of reaction requires that A is transported across CB and C across AD, assuming that the (usually smaller) cations are the mobile species. The interface reactions involved and the mechanisms of ion migration are similar to those already described for other systems. (It is also possible that solid solutions will be formed.) As Welch [111] has pointed out, reaction between solids, however complex they may be, can (usually) be resolved into a series of interactions between two phases. In complicated processes an increased number of phases, interfaces, and migrant entities must be characterized and this requires an appropriate increase in the number of variables measured, with all the attendant difficulties and limitations. However, the careful selection of components of the reactant mixture (e.g. the use of a common ion) or the imaginative design of reactant disposition can sometimes result in a significant simplification of the problems of interpretation, as is seen in some of the examples cited below. 

I knew nothing of the work of C. G. Vayenas on NEMCA until the early nineties. Then I learned from a paper of his idea (gas interface reactions could be catalyzed electrochemically), which seemed quite marvelous but I did not understand how it worked. 

Rudder AM, Leenders H, and van Blitterswijk CA. Interface reactions to PEO/PBT copolymers (Polyactive) after implantation in cortical bone. J Biomed Mater Res, 1994, 28, 141-151. 

Geckeis H, Klenze R, Kim J1 (1999) Solid-water interface reactions of actinides and homologues sorption onto mineral surfaces. Radiochim Acta 87 13-21... 

Basu RN, Tietz F, Wessel E, and Stover D. Interface reactions during co-firing of solid oxide fuel cell components. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2004 147 85-89. 

The results demonstrated that both compression and shear can induce the formation of C-C bonds between sp-hybridized carbons atoms, which leads to polymerization within the SAM. Interestingly, it was found that the location of these reactive sites within the film could influence the calculated friction. For instance, if the diacetylene components in the chains were close to the tip/film interface, reactions between the film and tip could occur, which led to wear and high friction. On the other hand, if the diacetylene moieties were far from the tip, the reactions did not lead to wear and had little effect on the average calculated friction. These observations demonstrate that a proper treatment of the chemical reactivity of the system may be necessary in some cases to calculate friction accurately. 

Keeping these problems in mind, several of the more widely used techniques are discussed below, with an emphasis placed on their application to bonding studies of minerals and species adsorbed on them during mineral/water interface reactions. As with any experimental techniques, many of these problems can be minimized or even eliminated if due caution is taken in performing the studies. 

Fig. 3.1 The I—V characteristic of (a) a p-type and (b) an n-type silicon electrode under the assumption that the current is dominated by the properties of the semiconductor and is not limited by interface reactions or by diffusion in the electrolyte, (c) The characteristic I—V curve in an alkaline electrolyte under the...

---