Levelized cost of electricity

The electricity production costs estimated in H2Sim are the levelized costs of electricity over the life of the plant. LCOE often are used as an economic measure of electricity costs as they allow for comparison of technologies with different capital and operating costs over time, as well as different construction times, capacity factors, and plant lives. The LCOE methodology is identical to that used for calculating hydrogen production costs [Equations (l)-(3)]. 

The levelized cost of electricity (LCOE), cost of hydrogen production, and cost of CO2 avoided are considered as the main economic performance characteristics of the applications investigated. 

Kadra Branker, Michael J. M. Pathak, and Joshua M. Pearce, A Review of Solar Photovoltaic Levelized Cost of Electricity, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 4470-4482 (2011). 

Table A7.3b Projected levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) in the United States by 2020 (as of 2015)... 

LCOE, levelized cost of electricity NG, natural gas CCS, carbon capture and storage IGCC, integrated gasification combined cycle PV, photovoltaic. 

LCOE, levelized cost of electricity CCGT, combined cycle gas turbine PV, photovoltaic. Data from htq>s //en.wikipedia,org/wiki/Cost of electricity by source. 

Chiesa and Con.sonni [1,3] have made detailed studies of how a CO2 tax would affect the economic viability of several of these cycles when a tax and CO2 removal are introduced. Fig. 8.27 shows their results on the cost of electricity for natural gas-fired plants plotted against the level of a carbon tax (in c/kg CO2 produced), for two of the novel cycles studied here, in comparison with an existing CCGT plant with natural gas firing. 

This configuration has the potential to yield a very competitive cost of electricity. For example, for a fuel cell stack cost of 300 to 400/kW, it is estimated that the COE would range from 3.5 to 3.9 cents/kWh (Assuming 20% equity at 16.5%, 80% debt at 6.3%, and a levelized carrying charge of 0.12.)... 

Consequently Ti sponge has quadrupled in price from 1975 to 1980, whereas the price of Zr has only doubled. It is expected that the relative price level of Zr will continue to swing widely, affecting the choice of Zr for some ordnance application. Earlier economic assessments regarding the high cost of Zr are quite invalid today, and it is expected that Zr will continue to remain attractive. The cost of the mineral raw material usedin producing Zr metal is small compared with production costs and changes in the price of zircon are not necessarily reflected in the price of the metal. Whereas historically the adjusted price for the mineral and the metal have been sharply downward, this trend seems to have been revised and in future the metal price will be better correlated with the cost of electric power... 

Thus, the view from Washington is an optimistic one. With support of the vast amount of research, development and engineering that scientists and engineers have completed and will do in the future, this country certainly is now headed towards a successful and orderly program for handling all radioactive wastes safely and inexpensively. The high-level waste program, for instance, will require only about 2% of the cost of electricity produced from nuclear power. 

Table 1. Benchmark (10-MW) System parameters and impact of multijunction (III-V) solar cell efficiency on a CPV utility reference system.7 High-efficiency solar cells are installed in essentially identical solar concentrator structures, and the cost per watt drops from about 6/watt to well under 2/watt while electricity costs fall below 10 cents per kWh. Higher production levels can lead to even lower levelized costs of energy (LCOE).7...

From the results presented in Table 7.A, the levelized electricity price for electricity produced by combined-cycle power plants fueled with first generation H2 is too expensive to be considered economically feasible. However, if the 60-year PV module operating life model proves relevant, then the levelized price of electricity generated by combined-cycle power plants using second generation H2 as a fuel source could be as low as 0.15-0.17/kWh. These electricity prices provide some assurance that if other options fail to meet electricity demand in the post-2040 period, dispatchable PV electricity will be a feasible option. Clearly, further progress in PV cost reduction, a near certainty by 2040, will reduce the price of electricity generated by H2 fueled power plants. 

Consider a house with a floor space of 200 m and an average height of 3 m at sea level, where the standard atmospheric pressure is 101.3 kPa. Initially the house is at a uniform temperature of 10 C. Now the electric heater is turned on. and the beater runs until the air temperature in the house rises to an average value of 22°C. Determine how much heat is absorbed by the air assuming some air escapes through the cracks as Ihe heated air in the house expands at constant pressure. Also, determine the cost of this heat if the unit cost of electricity in that area is 0.075/kWh. 

From the above discussion, it is clear that a given rate of production can be achieved by different combinations of reactor size and power consumption. The selection of the optimum reactor size is based on the annualized cost of the reactor. The annualized cost consists of the cost of capital (depreciation and interest on fixed cost) and the operating cost. The fixed cost consists mainly of equipment cost (that is, the material cost plus fabrication cost), and the operating cost consists mainly of electricity (power) cost. For the purpose of this illustration, five different materials of construction were selected having costs 0.3,1.0, 3.0,10.0, and 30.0 /kg. This range of costs covers practically all of the materials commonly used in industry, such as mild steel, stainless steel, glass-lined vessels, Hastelloy, titanium-lined vessels, and so forth. Two levels of (depreciation + interest) were examined 20% and 50% per annum. Three costs of electricity were used 0.035, 0.10, and... 

---