Key risk indicator

The key risk indicator (KRl) is an early warning to indicate that risk appetite is reached. So, this is an early warning for a potential risk, and is important in risk... 

Compliance embedded in day-to-day activities Key risk indicators with established limits, monitoring of safety risk within limits, corrective actions when thresholds exceeded Leadership and managers demonstrate safety Staff support safety daOy Blame-free culture Safety focus on creating value to business units at a competitive price... 

Key Performance Indicators Preparation for maintenance, the control of modifications, and the testing of protective equipment are examples of key performance indicators i.e., taken together, they indicate uie quality of the plant s and company s process safety. If they are below standard, the plant is at risk. The usual measure of safety, the lost-time accident (LTA) rate, does not measure process safety. Many companies that had a low LTA rate and assumed that their process safety was therefore under control have experienced serious fires and explosions. 

There is considerable variation in how an applicant pool can be generated. For example, a job vacancy can be placed on an online job site, in a newspaper, or posted on a notice board. Irrespective of how a job is advertised, the common element is that a written description of more or less detail is generally produced. A job vacancy advertisement should cover the job title, what the key tasks and roles are, what competencies are required to perform the job, how further information (e.g., job description and person specification) can be acquired, and how to apply for the position. To include a realistic safety preview, safety factors should be noted in the job advertisement. To omit any mention of safety is to miss an opportunity to ensure new employee safety. Furthermore, it is simply wrong for an organization to assume that individuals in the labor pool will already know about a job s safety risks. It is not necessary to provide extensive and detailed statements about safety in a job advertisement. Rather statements, such as There are safety risks associated with undertaking aspects of this job. This job is performed in a hazardous environment. Safety aspects associated with this job require employees to work with extreme causation. Safety compliance is a key performance indicator for this job. In order to maintain safety the successful candidate will have the following competencies. .., are examples of what could be included in order to bring the safety factors associated with the job to the attention of interested individuals. 

This chapter discusses the nature of culture as it applies to the safety and general risk management of process facilities. Also discussed here are related issues such as Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), Employee Participation, Behavior-Based Safety (BBS) and Inherent Safety. 

Alternatively, she might find that her team is well-trained and adept at identifying safety risks, and management promotes the reporting of the same. But when it comes time to allocate resources to fix those unsafe or at-risk observations, other priorities such as profitability or production deadlines take precedence and these at-risk occurrences continue to pile up. This is another key leading indicator of risk. 

Knowledge evolves over time as research and development yields operational enhancements to process facilities. ISA-TR84.00.04-1 Annex R provides examples of key performance indicators that can be used to monitor aspects of the SIS lifecycle. Events involving abnormal operation may identify weaknesses in the risk-reduction strategy, leading to the need for more safeguards and improved performance metrics. New ideas identify ways to lower risk further. 

With all of this information, you can also trend accident results, open hazards, or other data. This will give you something substantial to use to develop a set of metrics, key performance indicators, or key safety or risk indicators, or to assess whether the hazard controls are really worth the cost (or the opposite, if the lack of hazard controls is worth the price). 

Use metrics to identify resource risks, track improvements, and better understand resource impact. Develop and track key performance indicators. Set meaningful benchmarks. 

There may even be new paradigms introduced about safety e.g., there was a vogue in the late 1990s for the rate of industrial safety accidents (i.e., accidents arising from sUps, trips and falls in the workplace) to be used by senior management as a surrogate key performance indicator (KPI) for the safety of a hazardous industrial process, i.e., the risk of a major process accident such as a fire or explosion. Clearly, these are two almost entirely different issues. 

Henke, M., Jahns, Chr., 2005. The Importance of Supplier Performance Measurement and Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for the Systematic Management of Supply Risks. In Proceedings. 16th Annual North American Research Symposium on Ihirchasing and Supply Management. Tempe, Arizona. March 17-19,2005,219-239. 

This gives rise to the risk of minimum requirements and key performance indicators being transferred one-to-one, even though they are not suitahie for MID and consequentiy often cannot be met. The way to avoid these difficuities is to define specific quaiity requirements for each MID product in ciose cooperation with the ciient and cioseiy matched to the specific appiication. 

Any individual point on the curve is obtained by summing the frequencies of all events resulting in that number of fatalities or greater. The slope of the cui ve and the maximum number of fatalities are two key indicators of the degree of risk. 

One should identify exposure pathways that have the potential to expose the same individual or sub-population at the key exposure areas evaluated in the exposure assessment, making sure to consider areas of highest exposure for each patliway for both current and future land-uses (c.g., nemest down-gradient well, nearest dowiuvind receptor). For each pathway, the risk estimates and hazard indices have been developed for a particular exposure area... 

Upon stabilization, placement of a pulmonary artery (PA) catheter may be indicated based on the need for more extensive cardiovascular monitoring than is available from non-invasive measurements such as vital signs, cardiac rhythm, and urine output.9,10 Key measured parameters that can be obtained from a PA catheter are the pulmonary artery occlusion pressure, which is a measure of preload, and CO. From these values and simultaneous measurement of HR and blood pressure (BP), one can calculate the left ventricular SV and SVR.10 Placement of a PA catheter should be reserved for patients at high risk of death due to the severity of shock or preexisting medical conditions such as heart failure.11 Use of PA catheters in broad populations of critically ill patients is somewhat controversial because clinical trials have not shown consistent benefits with their use.12-14 However, critically ill patients with a high severity of illness may have improved outcomes from PA catheter placement. It is not clear why this was... 

---