Sensors irreversible

The ideal (bio)chemical sensor should operate reversibly and respond like a physical sensor (e.g. a thermometer), i.e. it should be responsive to both high and low analyte concentrations and provide a nil response in its absence. One typical example is the pH electrode. In short, a reversible (bio)chemical sensor provides a response consistent with the actual variation in the analyte concentration in the sample and is not limited by any change or disruption in practical terms, responsiveness is inherent in reversibility. An irreversible-non-regenerable (bio)chemical sensor only responds to increases in the analyte concentration and can readily become saturated only those (bio)chemical sensors of this type intended for a single service (disposable or single-use sensors) are of practical interest. On the other hand, an irreversible-reusable sensor produces a response similar to that from an irreversible sensor but does not work in a continuous fashion as it requires two steps (measurement and renewal) to be rendered reusable. Figures 1.12 and 1.13 show the typical responses provided by this type of sensor. Note... 

While reversible sensors are the ideal sensors, those irreversible sensors containing an immobilized reagent that can be regenerated approach the ideal... 

For a reversible sensor, sensitivity is defined as the change in sensor output signal obtained for an incremental change in the concentration or mass of the analyte, i.e., the slope of the response-vs-concentration curve. Sensitivity for a reversible AW sensor typically has units of [frequency change]/[concentration change], e.g., Hz/M (M mol/L), Hz/(/ug/L), or even ppm >pm (normalized frequency shift/concentration). For an irreversible sensor, sensitivity is more appropriately defined in terms of frequency change/integrated exposure, e.g., Hz/M-min. 

Another frequent problem encountered in the field and particularly in highly polluted atmosphere is a sensor failure or an irreversible sensor poisoning. Clearly, life expectancy of sensors is reduced for real-life operation with respect to clean lab operation. Sensor replacement is generally required to address such issue, but, after replacement, odours should still be recognised without having to recalibrate the whole system. 

Panesh et al. [157] were the first to make an attempt to detect rare gas metastable atoms (RGMAs) with the aid of semiconductor sensors. The sensing element (a sensor) was represented by a sintered polycrystalline film of ZnO metastable atoms were obtained in a neon ambient by electron impact. It was shown that electrical conductivity of ZnO film irreversibly increases under the action of RGMAs. However, the signals obtained were too small and that did not allow one to utilize the sensing technique to survey the processes with participation of metastable atoms. 

Another methodical trait of the Au/ZnO sensor application to detect metastable atoms of rare gases is the limitation of the range of operating temperatures. When heated to above 500 K, these sensors irreversibly loose their sensitivity to RGMAs. The loss of sensitivity is associated with the coalescence of Au microcrystals applied to a ZnO surface. The causes of this will be discussed later. 

The procedures of experiments were the following [15, 26]. After deposition of a specific quantity of silver on substrate the heating of a tray with silver was turned off, the shutter 7 was opened and the sensor was positioned opposite to the substrate in such a manner that the surface of the sensor was parallel to the surface of substrate. In these experiments we detected an irreversible donor signal of the sensor which can be related to adsorption silver atoms on the sensor made of a zinc oxide film. It is known [27] that silver atoms are donors of electrons. Note that the signals of the sensor were observed only when the sensor was positioned in front of a substrate. There were no signals detected in any other arrangement between sensor and substrate. 

When the Zincon ion-pair is exposed to an aqueous sample containing the analyte, the latter diffuses into the sensor membrane to react with the indicator, and gives a colour transition from pink to blue at near neutral pH. The pKa value of Zincon for the color transition from pink to blue is above 13, therefore, the sensor membrane is virtually insensitive to pH changes. However, due to the high complexation constant of Zincon for copper and zinc, the response of sensor membrane is irreversible and must be evaluated kinetically12. 

Unfortunately, in the presence of detectable polyions in the solution a strong potential drift is normally observed due to the instability of the ion concentration gradients. Moreover, the main disadvantage of polyion-selective potentiometric electrodes lies in the intrinsic irreversibility of the underlying response mechanism. The target polyions eventually displace the counter-ions in the membrane phase and consequently the sensor loses its response. 

The disadvantages described above in terms of the irreversibility of the polyion response stimulated further research efforts in the area of polyion-selective sensors. Recently, a new detection technique was proposed utilizing electrochemically controlled, reversible ion extraction into polymeric membranes in an alternating galvanostatic/potentiostatic mode [51]. The solvent polymeric membrane of this novel class of sensors contained a highly lipophilic electrolyte and, therefore, did not possess ion exchange properties in contrast to potentiometric polyion electrodes. Indeed, the process of ion extraction was here induced electrochemically by applying a constant current pulse. 

A baseline potential pulse followed each current pulse in order to strip extracted ions from the membrane phase and, therefore, regenerated the membrane, making it ready for the next measurement pulse. This made sure that the potentials are sampled at discrete times within a pulse that correspond to a 6m that is reproducible from pulse to pulse. This made it possible to yield a reproducible sensor on the basis of a chemically irreversible reaction. It was shown that the duration of the stripping period has to be at least ten times longer than the current pulse [53], Moreover the value of the baseline (stripping) potential must be equal to the equilibrium open-circuit potential of the membrane electrode, as demonstrated in [52], This open-circuit potential can be measured prior to the experiment with respect to the reference electrode. 

Rinsing the sensor surface with buffer results in an irreversible dissociation, because all molecules which dissociate from immobilized protein are removed from the system by the buffer stream, allowing one to determine the rate constant of dissociation separately. 

We have shown a new concept for selective chemical sensing based on composite core/shell polymer/silica colloidal crystal films. The vapor response selectivity is provided via the multivariate spectral analysis of the fundamental diffraction peak from the colloidal crystal film. Of course, as with any other analytical device, care should be taken not to irreversibly poison this sensor. For example, a prolonged exposure to high concentrations of nonpolar vapors will likely to irreversibly destroy the composite colloidal crystal film. Nevertheless, sensor materials based on the colloidal crystal films promise to have an improved long-term stability over the sensor materials based on organic colorimetric reagents incorporated into polymer films due to the elimination of photobleaching effects. In the experiments... 

It is difficult to incorporate dehydrogenases that are coupled with NAD(P) into amperometric enzyme sensors owing to the irreversible electrochemical reaction of NAD. We have developed an amperometric dehydrogenase sensor for ethanol in which NAD is electrochemically regenerated within a membrane matrix. 

OFDs can be divided into two subclasses (1) optical fiber chemical detectors (OFCD) which detect the presence of chemical species in samples, and (2) optical fiber biomolecular detectors (OFBD) which detect biomolecules in samples. Each subclass can be divided further into probes and sensors, and bioprobes and biosensors, respectively. As a result of the rapid expansion of optical research, these terms have not been clearly defined and to date, the terms probe and sensof have been used synonymously in the literature. As the number of publications increases, the terminology should be clarified. Although both probes and sensors serve to detect chemicals in samples, they are not identical. The same situation exists with bioprobes and biosensors. Simply, probes and bioprobes are irreversible to the analyte s presence, whereas sensors and biosensors monitor compounds reversibly and continuously. 

Chemical and Genetic Probes—Nanotube-tipped atomic force microscopes can trace a strand of DNA and identify chemical markers that reveal DNA fine structure. A miniaturized sensor has been constructed based on coupling the electronic properties of nanotubes with the specific recognition properties of immobilized biomolecules by attaching organic molecules handles to these tubular nanostructures. In one study, the pi-electron network on the CNT is used to anchor a molecule that irreversibly adsorbs to the surface of the SWNT. The anchored molecules have a tail to which proteins, or a variety of other... 

Figure 1.12 — Comparison of the response of reversible and irreversible-non-regenerable sensors with the actual signal variation. S signal t time. For details, see text. (Reproduced from [21] with permission of VCH Publishers).

---