Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Surfaces sensors

More accurately, as the inverse problem process computes a quadratic error with every point of a local area around a flaw, we shall limit the sensor surface so that the quadratic error induced by the integration lets us separate two close flaws and remains negligible in comparison with other noises or errors. An inevitable noise is the electronic noise due to the coil resistance, that we can estimate from geometrical and physical properties of the sensor. Here are the main conclusions ... [Pg.358]

In the case of a temperature probe, the capacity is a heat capacity C == me, where m is the mass and c the material heat capacity, and the resistance is a thermal resistance R = l/(hA), where h is the heat transfer coefficient and A is the sensor surface area. Thus the time constant of a temperature probe is T = mc/ hA). Note that the time constant depends not only on the probe, but also on the environment in which the probe is located. According to the same principle, the time constant, for example, of the flow cell of a gas analyzer is r = Vwhere V is the volume of the cell and the sample flow rate. [Pg.1134]

In conduction models of semiconductor gas sensors, surface barriers of intergranular contacts dominate the resistance. Electrons must overcome this energy barrier, eV., in order to cross from one grain to another. For these... [Pg.1308]

PGIP, purified fi om P.vulgaris hypocotyls [11], was immobilized to the sensor ch via amine coupling. A continuous flow of HBS buffer (5 pl/min) was mantained over the sensor surface. The carboxylated dextran matrix of the sensor surface was first activated by a 6-min injection of a mixture of N-hydroxy-succinimide and N-ethyl-N - (3-diethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide, followed by a 7-min injection of PGIP (lOng/pl in 10 mM acetate, pH 5.0). Hie immobilization procedure was con leted by a 7-min injection of 1 M ethanolamine hydrochloride to block the remaining ester groups. [Pg.776]

The results on pyrolysis of acetone displayed in Fig. 4.5 are consistent with formula (4.8). Thus, variation of the concentration of free radicals near the sensor surface and, consequently, variation of the value idv/dt)tMi = o as functions of the filament temperature are governed by relation (4.8). As the acetone pressure increases, this relation fails because of fast interaction of CH3 radicals with acetone molecules. [Pg.226]

Note that all parameters mentioned in the formulas should be considered as certain averaged magnitudes characteristic of the entire aggregate of the Au-ZnO microcontacts on the sensor surface. [Pg.339]

The evaluation of amount of silver atoms desorbed from resonator during 80 h operation was made applying the known relations [36] for silver atoms adsorbed on the sensor surface in charged form accounting for the fraction of atoms transferred from the source (resonator) to the target (sensor). The estimates indicate that intensity of the flux of silver atoms from the surface of resonator in this experiment was about 1.5-10 3 m 2-s S i.e. during 75 h operations approximately 10% of the surface silver atoms left resonator (under condition that the amount of surface silver atoms is about 4-10 m ) explaining the shift of resonant frequency from its nominal value 10 MHz by 11 Hz. [Pg.368]

Figure 7.9. Schematic diagram of a surface plasmon resonance biosensor. One of the binding partners is immobilized on the sensor surface. With the BIACORE instrument, the soluble molecule is allowed to flow over the immobilized molecule. Binding of the soluble molecule results in a change in the refractive index of the solvent near the surface of the sensor chip. The magnitude of the shift in refractive index is related quantitatively to the amount of the soluble molecule that is bound. Figure 7.9. Schematic diagram of a surface plasmon resonance biosensor. One of the binding partners is immobilized on the sensor surface. With the BIACORE instrument, the soluble molecule is allowed to flow over the immobilized molecule. Binding of the soluble molecule results in a change in the refractive index of the solvent near the surface of the sensor chip. The magnitude of the shift in refractive index is related quantitatively to the amount of the soluble molecule that is bound.
New developments in immobilization surfaces have lead to the use of SPR biosensors to monitor protein interactions with lipid surfaces and membrane-associated proteins. Commercially available (BIACORE) hydrophobic and lipophilic sensor surfaces have been designed to create stable membrane surfaces. It has been shown that the hydrophobic sensor surface can be used to form a lipid monolayer (Evans and MacKenzie, 1999). This monolayer surface can be used to monitor protein-lipid interactions. For example, a biosensor was used to examine binding of Src homology 2 domain to phosphoinositides within phospholipid bilayers (Surdo et al., 1999). In addition, a lipophilic sensor surface can be used to capture liposomes and form a lipid bilayer resembling a biological membrane. [Pg.103]

Kinetics evaluation software generates the values of ka (rates of complex formation) and kd (rates of complex dissociation) by fitting the data to interaction models. In a sensorgram, if binding occurs as sample passes over a prepared sensor surface, the response increases and is registered upon equilibrium, a constant signal is reached. The signal decreases when the sample is replaced with buffer, since the bound molecules dissociate. [Pg.235]

The affinity (interaction strength), multiple interactions, and the changes in concentration can be also monitored from those studies. To deliver data in real time, the natural phenomenon of surface plasmon resonance (SPR) is employed. Since the refractive index (r ) at the interface changes as molecules are immobilized on the sensor surface, instant measure of r provides real-time assessment. The Tlcxchip platform exploits grating-coupled SPR (GC-SPR) for this purpose. [Pg.235]


See other pages where Surfaces sensors is mentioned: [Pg.208]    [Pg.2328]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.173]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.776]    [Pg.779]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.196]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.299]    [Pg.330]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.103]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.139]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.184]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.187]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.188]    [Pg.189]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.339 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info