Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Iron solvent extraction

Lanthanum was isolated in relatively pure form in 1923. Iron exchange and solvent extraction techniques have led to much easier isolation of the so-called "rare-earth" elements. [Pg.128]

Another solvent extraction scheme uses the mixed anhydrous chlorides from a chlorination process as the feed (28). The chlorides, which are mostly of niobium, tantalum, and iron, are dissolved in an organic phase and are extracted with 12 Ai hydrochloric acid. The best separation occurs from a mixture of MIBK and diisobutyl ketone (DIBK). The tantalum transfers to the hydrochloric acid leaving the niobium and iron, the DIBK enhancing the separation factor in the organic phase. Niobium and iron are stripped with hot 14—20 wt % H2SO4 which is boiled to precipitate niobic acid, leaving the iron in solution. [Pg.23]

For solvent extraction of a tetravalent vanadium oxyvanadium cation, the leach solution is acidified to ca pH 1.6—2.0 by addition of sulfuric acid, and the redox potential is adjusted to —250 mV by heating and reaction with iron powder. Vanadium is extracted from the blue solution in ca six countercurrent mixer—settler stages by a kerosene solution of 5—6 wt % di-2-ethyIhexyl phosphoric acid (EHPA) and 3 wt % tributyl phosphate (TBP). The organic solvent is stripped by a 15 wt % sulfuric acid solution. The rich strip Hquor containing ca 50—65 g V20 /L is oxidized batchwise initially at pH 0.3 by addition of sodium chlorate then it is heated to 70°C and agitated during the addition of NH to raise the pH to 0.6. Vanadium pentoxide of 98—99% grade precipitates, is removed by filtration, and then is fused and flaked. [Pg.392]

Metal Extraction. As with other carboxyhc acids, neodecanoic acid can be used in the solvent extraction of metal ions from aqueous solutions. Recent appHcations include the extraction of zinc from river water for deterrnination by atomic absorption spectrophotometry (105), the coextraction of metals such as nickel, cobalt, and copper with iron (106), and the recovery of copper from ammoniacal leaching solutions (107). [Pg.106]

Selectivity for a single metal of a group is the basis of a solvent extraction process for the recovery of copper (qv) from low concentration ore leach solutions containing high levels of iron (qv) and other interfering metals (16). [Pg.386]

Cementation. Cementation is the precipitation of copper from copper leach solutions by replacement with iron. It was formerly the most commonly used method of recovering copper from leach solutions but has been replaced by solvent extraction—electro winning. The type of iron used ia cementation is important, and the most widely used material is detinned, light-gauge, shredded scrap iron. This operation can be performed by the scrap iron cone (Keimecott Precipitation Cone) or a vibrating cementation mill that combines high copper precipitation efficiency and reduced iron consumption (41). [Pg.206]

Perez de Ortiz, E.S., Dias Lay, M. De L., Gruentges, K., Aluminium and iron extraction by DNNSA and DNNSA-DEHPA reverse micelles, Int. Solvent Extraction Conf. (ISEC 96) Value adding through solvent extraction, Ed. Shallcross, D.C., Paimin, R. Prvcic, L.M., Melbourne, Australia, pp.409-411, 1996. [Pg.369]

The Friedel-Crafts acylation reaction has also been performed in iron(III) chloride ionic liquids, by Seddon and co-workers [96]. An example is the acetylation of benzene (Scheme 5.1-66). Ionic liquids of the type [EMIM]Cl/FeCl3 (0.50 < X(FeCl3) < 0.62) are good acylation catalysts, with the added benefit that the ketone product of the reaction can be separated from the ionic liquid by solvent extraction, provided that X(FeCl3) is in the range 0.51-0.55. [Pg.207]

Procedure. Weigh out 0.0226 g of hydrated ammonium iron(III) sulphate and dissolve it in 1 L of water in a graduated flask 50 mL of this solution contain 100 g of iron. Place 50.0 mL of the solution in a 100 mL separatory funnel, add 10 mL of a 1 per cent oxine (analytical grade) solution in chloroform and shake for 1 minute. Separate the chloroform layer. Transfer a portion of the latter to a 1.0 cm absorption cell. Determine the absorbance at 470 nm in a spectrophotometer, using the solvent as a blank or reference. Repeat the extraction with a further 10 mL of 1 per cent oxine solution in chloroform, and measure the absorbance to confirm that all the iron was extracted. [Pg.178]

V. H. Aprahamian and D. G. Demopoulos, The Solution Chemistry and Solvent Extraction Behaviour of copper, iron, nickel, zinc, lead, tin, Ag, arsenic, antimony, bismuth, selenium and tellurium in Acid Chloride Solutions Reviewed from the Standpoint of PGM Refining, Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy Review, Vol. 14, p. 143,1995. [Pg.579]

Cupertino, D. C. Charlton, M. H. Buttar, D. Swart, R. M. Maes, C. J. A study of copper/iron separation in modern solvent extraction plants. Proceedings of the COPPER 99-COBRE 99 International Conference, 4th, Phoenix, Oct. 10-13, 1999, 4, 263-276. [Pg.801]

An appropriate amount of hydrated iron (III) or bismuth oxide was added the oxide precipitates were prepared separately and washed thoroughly with distilled water before use [43]. After about 24 h, the samples were filtered on 0.4 jtm Nuclepore filters. The separated precipitates were dissolved with hydrochloric acid and the solutions obtained were used for /-activity measurements. In the examination of solvent extraction, chromium was measured by using 51Cr, while iron and bismuth were measured by electrothermal AAS (EAAS). The decomposition of organic complexes and other procedures were also examined by EAAS. [Pg.69]

Other methods reported for the determination of beryllium include UV-visible spectrophotometry [80,81,83], gas chromatography (GC) [82], flame atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS) [84-88] and graphite furnace (GF) AAS [89-96]. The ligand acetylacetone (acac) reacts with beryllium to form a beryllium-acac complex, and has been extensively used as an extracting reagent of beryllium. Indeed, the solvent extraction of beryllium as the acety-lacetonate complex in the presence of EDTA has been used as a pretreatment method prior to atomic absorption spectrometry [85-87]. Less than 1 p,g of beryllium can be separated from milligram levels of iron, aluminium, chromium, zinc, copper, manganese, silver, selenium, and uranium by this method. See also Sect. 5.74.9. [Pg.142]

A conventional analytical method, like solvent extraction-graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometric detection, requires a contamination-free technique. Moreover, it is time-consuming and troublesome, as litres of the sample solution must be treated because the dissolved concentration of iron in oceanic waters is extremely low (lnmol/1 = 56ng/l). Martin et al. [341] recently found that the dissolved concentration of iron was less. [Pg.183]

Atomic absorption spectrometry coupled with solvent extraction of iron complexes has been used to determine down to 0.5 pg/1 iron in seawater [354, 355]. Hiire [354] extracted iron as its 8-hydroxyquinoline complex. The sample is buffered to pH 3-6 and extracted with a 0.1 % methyl isobutyl ketone solution of 8-hydroxyquinoline. The extraction is aspirated into an air-acetylene flame and evaluated at 248.3 nm. [Pg.183]

Moore [355] used the solvent extraction procedure of Danielson et al. [119] to determine iron in frozen seawater. To a 200 ml aliquot of sample was added lml of a solution containing sodium diethyldithiocarbamate (1% w/v) and ammonium pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (1 % w/v) at pH to 4. The solution was extracted three times with 5 ml volumes of 1,1,2 trichloro-1,2,2 trifluoroethane, and the organic phase evaporated to dryness in a silica vial and treated with 0.1 ml Ultrex hydrogen peroxide (30%) to initiate the decomposition of organic matter present. After an hour or more, 0.5 ml 0.1 M hydrochloric acid was added and the solution irradiated with a 1000 W Hanovia medium pressure mercury vapour discharge tube at a distance of 4 cm for 18 minutes. The iron in the concentrate was then compared with standards in 0.1 M hydrochloric acid using a Perkin-Elmer Model 403 Spectrophotometer fitted with a Perkin-Elmer graphite furnace (HGA 2200). [Pg.183]

A comparison was carried out on the results obtained using ICP-AES and AAS for eight elements in coastal Pacific Ocean water. The results for cadmium, lead, copper, iron, zinc, and nickel are in good agreement. For iron, the data obtained by the solvent extraction ICP method are also in good agreement with those determined directly by ICP-AES. In most of the results the relative standard deviations were 4% for all elements except cadmium and lead, which had relative standard deviations of about 20% owing to the low concentrations determined. [Pg.261]

Kingston et al. [32] preconcentrated the eight transition elements cadmium, cobalt, copper, iron, manganese, nickel, lead, and zinc from estuarine and seawater using solvent extraction/chelation and determined them at sub ng/1 levels by GFA-AS. [Pg.337]

Fig. 6.4. Effects of the pore size of filter paper used during fluid sampling on the analytical concentrations reported for aluminum and iron (Kennedy el al., 1974). Samples were acidified, stored for 19 ( ) or 94 ( ) days, and analyzed by standard wet chemical methods. Dotted lines show dissolved concentrations determined by a solvent extraction technique. Fig. 6.4. Effects of the pore size of filter paper used during fluid sampling on the analytical concentrations reported for aluminum and iron (Kennedy el al., 1974). Samples were acidified, stored for 19 ( ) or 94 ( ) days, and analyzed by standard wet chemical methods. Dotted lines show dissolved concentrations determined by a solvent extraction technique.
Enciforming [National Chemical reforming] A petroleum reforming process that converts pyrolysis gasoline to mixtures of propane, butane, and aromatic hydrocarbons, thereby obviating the usual hydrogenation and solvent extraction processes. The catalyst is a ZSM-5-type zeolite containing both iron and a platinum metal. Developed by the National Chemical Laboratory, Pune, India, since 1988, but not yet commercialized. [Pg.99]


See other pages where Iron solvent extraction is mentioned: [Pg.11]    [Pg.284]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.565]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.406]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.1228]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.487]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.576]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.783]    [Pg.783]    [Pg.215]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.278]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.355]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.622 ]




SEARCH



Amines iron complexes, solvent extraction

Iron extractability

Iron extraction

Iron sulfamate solvent extraction

© 2024 chempedia.info