Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Interfacial Boundaries

Installation for Ultrasonic Testing AKV-S is designed for testing of diesel motors pistons. Particularly, this device identifies the areas with cracks and lowered adhesion on interfacial boundary between niresist ring and base material. [Pg.884]

Three principal vapor—Hquid contacting devices are used in current crossflow plate design the sieve plate, the valve plate, and the bubble cap plate. These devices provide the needed intimate contacting of vapor and Hquid, requisite to maximizing transfer of mass across the interfacial boundary. [Pg.167]

As this volume attests, a wide range of chemistry occurs at interfacial boundaries. Examples range from biological and medicinal interfacial problems, such as the chemistry of anesthesia, to solar energy conversion and electrode processes in batteries, to industrial-scale separations of metal ores across interfaces, to investigations into self-assembled monolayers and Langmuir-Blodgett films for nanoelectronics and nonlinear optical materials. These problems are based not only on structure and composition of the interface but also on kinetic processes that occur at interfaces. As such, there is considerable motivation to explore chemical dynamics at interfaces. [Pg.404]

The interfacial boundary condition may be written in terms of the convective heat transfer of sensible heat, latent heat transfer due to evaporation, and, if the surface temperature is high enough, radiant heat transfer. Mathematically, the surface boundary condition is... [Pg.76]

Table III shows that the experimental and predicted evaporation rates are in good agreement at all beam intensities. There is some inconsistency at the highest power levels. It was difficult to maintain the droplet in the center of the laser beam at the highest power level, and the measured evaporation rate is somewhat low as a result of that problem. Additional computations demonstrate that the predicted evaporation rate is quite sensitive to the choice of the imaginary component of N, so the results suggest that this evaporation method is suitable for the determination of the complex refractive index of weakly absorbing liquids. For strong absorbers, the linearizations of the Clausius-Clapeyron equation and of the radiation energy loss term in the interfacial boundary condition may not be valid. In this event, a numerical solution of the governing equations is required. The structure of the source function, however, makes this a rather tedious task. Table III shows that the experimental and predicted evaporation rates are in good agreement at all beam intensities. There is some inconsistency at the highest power levels. It was difficult to maintain the droplet in the center of the laser beam at the highest power level, and the measured evaporation rate is somewhat low as a result of that problem. Additional computations demonstrate that the predicted evaporation rate is quite sensitive to the choice of the imaginary component of N, so the results suggest that this evaporation method is suitable for the determination of the complex refractive index of weakly absorbing liquids. For strong absorbers, the linearizations of the Clausius-Clapeyron equation and of the radiation energy loss term in the interfacial boundary condition may not be valid. In this event, a numerical solution of the governing equations is required. The structure of the source function, however, makes this a rather tedious task.
A complete treatment of interfacial boundary conditions in tensor notation is given by Scriven (S2). If surface viscosities are ignored, the normal stress condition reduces to... [Pg.5]

While the viscous sublayer may be important for momentum transport, it is everything for mass and heat transport through liquids. Virtually the entire concentration boundary layer is within the viscous sublayer This difference is important in our assumptions related to interfacial transport, the topic of Chapter 8, where mass is transported through an interfacial boundary layer. [Pg.87]

It is commonly stated that the first readily observable event at the interface between a material and a biological Quid is protein or macromolecule adsorption. Clearly other interactions precede protein adsorption water adsorption and possibly absorption (hydration effects), ion bonding and electrical double layer formation, and the adsorption and absorption of low molecular weight solutes — such as amino acids. The protein adsorption event must result in major perturbation of the interfacial boundary layer which initially consists of water, ions, and other solutes. [Pg.3]

As previously mentioned, molecules that are present within the interface may be able to bind or release electrons from the outer electron hull that surrounds the positively charged proton-neutron core—i.e., they can be ionized. In systems with interfacial boundaries containing ions that carry a charge, a spatial distribution of counter ions surrounding the interface will develop. The number of counter ions will decrease as the distance from the interface increases. The counter ion atmosphere is also referred to as the ion cloud. The... [Pg.622]

Table 1 of a paper by Murr (2) lists problems and/or concerns related to specific interface materials and specific components of SECS. In Table 2 of the same work, he related topical study areas and/or research problems to S/S, S/L, S/G, L/L, and L/G interfaces. It is also useful to divide interface science into specific topical areas of study and consider how these will apply to interfaces in solar materials. These study areas are thin films grain, phase, and interfacial boundaries oxidation and corrosion adhesion semiconductors surface processes, chemisorption, and catalysis abrasion and erosion photon-assisted surface reactions and photoelectrochemistry and interface characterization methods. The actual or potential solar applications, research issues and/or concerns, and needs and opportunities are presented in the proceedings of a recent Workshop (4) and summarized in a recent review (3). [Pg.336]

The interfacial potential differences which develop in electrode-solution systems are limited to only a few volts at most. This may not seem like very much until you consider that this potential difference spans a very small distance. In the case of an electrode immersed in a solution, this distance corresponds to the thin layer of water molecules and ions that attach themselves to the electrode surface— normally only a few atomic diameters. Thus a very small voltage can produce a very large potential gradient. For example, a potential difference of one volt across a typical 1CT8 cm interfacial boundary amounts to a potential gradient of 100 million volts per centimeter— a very significant value indeed ... [Pg.5]

The axial voidage distribution resulting from mixing of dissimilar particles, as shown in Fig. 26, will now be examined in the light of the dynamics of these particles at the interfacial boundary between the properly juxtaposed phases of a binary particle mixture (Lou, 1964 Kwauk, 1973). Both the lighter particles at the top and the heavier particles at the bottom share the same tendency of invading the region occupied by the other. This behavior conforms to the concept of random walk, for which Fick s law can be adapted to describe the macroscopic diffusion flux of the smaller particles 2 ... [Pg.261]

Le Grand (36) has developed a model to account for domain formation and stability based on the change in free energy which occurs between a random mixture of block copolymer molecules and a micellar domain structure. The model also considers contributions to the free energy of the domain morphology resulting from the interfacial boundary between phases and elastic deformation of the domains. [Pg.13]

From the above outline, the mass-transport problem is seen to consist of coupled boundary value problems (in gas and aqueous phase) with an interfacial boundary condition. Cloud droplets are sufficiently sparse (typical separation is of order 100 drop radii) that drops may be treated as independent. For cloud droplets (diameter 5 ym to 40 pm) both gas- and aqueous-phase mass-transport are dominated by molecular diffusion. The flux across the interface is given by the molecular collision rate times an accommodation coefficient (a 1) that represents the fraction of collisions leading to transfer of material across the interface. Magnitudes of mass-accommodation coefficients are not well known generally and this holds especially in the case of solute gases upon aqueous solutions. For this reason a is treated as an adjustable parameter, and we examine the values of a for which interfacial mass-transport limitation is significant. Values of a in the range 10 6 to 1 have been assumed in recent studies (e.g.,... [Pg.103]

Solution of the coupled mass-transport and reaction problem for arbitrary chemical kinetic rate laws is possible only by numerical methods. The problem is greatly simplified by decoupling the time dependence of mass-transport from that of chemical kinetics the mass-transport solutions rapidly relax to a pseudo steady state in view of the small dimensions of the system (19). The gas-phase diffusion problem may be solved parametrically in terms of the net flux into the drop. In the case of first-order or pseudo-first-order chemical kinetics an analytical solution to the problem of coupled aqueous-phase diffusion and reaction is available (19). These solutions, together with the interfacial boundary condition, specify the concentration profile of the reagent gas. In turn the extent of departure of the reaction rate from that corresponding to saturation may be determined. Finally criteria have been developed (17,19) by which it may be ascertained whether or not there is appreciable (e.g., 10%) limitation to the rate of reaction as a consequence of the finite rate of mass transport. These criteria are listed in Table 1. [Pg.103]

Since these interfaces are usually constructed of charged detergents a diffuse electrical double layer is produced and the interfacial boundary can be characterized by a surface potential. Consequently, electrostatic as well as hydrophilic and hydrophobic interactions of the interfacial system can be designed. In this report we will review our achievements in organizing photosensitized electron transfer reactions in different microenvironments such as bilayer membranes and water-in-oil microemulsions.In addition, a novel solid-liquid interface, provided by colloidal Si02 particles in an aqueous medium will be discussed as a means of controlling photosensitized electron transfer reactions. [Pg.77]

FIGURE 9.7 Formation of interfacial boundary layers (a) absorption (b) stripping. [Pg.441]

Between liquid and gas phases, the transfer of mass from one phase to the other must pass through the interfacial boundary surface. Call the concentration of the solute at this surface as [yj referred to the gas phase. The corresponding concentration referred to the liquid phase is [xj. [xj and [yj are the same concentration of... [Pg.441]

Consider the process of absorption. If [y] is the concentration in the bulk gas phase, the driving force toward the interfacial boundary is [y] - [yj and the rate of mass transfer is Ay([y] - [yJ), where ky is the gas film coefficient of mass transfer. For this rate of mass transfer to exist, it must be balanced by an equal rate of mass transfer at the liquid film. The liquid phase mass transfer rate is kJ Xj - [x]), where is the liquid film coefficient of mass transfer and [x] is the bulk concentration of the solute in the liquid phase. Thus,... [Pg.442]

Microspheres are small and have large surface-to-volume ratios. At the lower end of their size range they have colloidal properties. The interfacial properties of microspheres are extremely important, often dictating their activity. In fact, the principle of microsphere manufacture depends on the creation of an interfacial area, involving a polymeric material that will form an interfacial boundary and a method of cross-linking to impart permanency. The methods of manufacturing described later are by no means comprehensive and the reader should bear in mind that if the aforementioned criteria are adhered to, the only limitation to the manufacture of microspheres is the researcher s imagination. [Pg.2328]


See other pages where Interfacial Boundaries is mentioned: [Pg.281]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.398]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.142]    [Pg.79]    [Pg.131]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.617]    [Pg.623]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.324]    [Pg.572]    [Pg.593]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.361]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.448]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.21]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.281]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.605 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.4 , Pg.63 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.187 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.103 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info