Interface list

Now the method getCompounds returns an interface—List, which is a super type of all possible concrete List classes. No matter what kind of list CompoundLibrary uses to hold its compounds, its clients do not need to care any more because what they get is the common abstraction List. Another way to achieve this is to have getCompounds to return an iterator. Please note the iterator() method in Java Collection Framework creates a new iterator object every time it is called and therefore is an expensive operation and should be used with discretion. 

Note Whether the member variable compoundList of CompoundLibrary should be declared as an interface—List or a concrete type—ArrayList should be determined on a case-by-case basis. If the concrete class has methods that are not defined in the interface or the abstract class, you are better off defining the variable as the concrete type. Otherwise, you need to explicitly cast the variable to the concrete type every time you use those methods. Either way, the clients of CompoundList are no longer affected by the decision made by the developer of CompoundLibrary with regard to the data type of compoundList variable, which is what abstraction or encapsulation is all about. 

Provide an unambiguous and commonly understood operational and interface listing of functional and system requirements, which can be tested during PQ... 

A tremendous impact for all those FDMU approaches is given by Modelica Association with the recent functional mock-up interface (FMl) [29]. In this approach, corresponding commercial modeling and simulation tools are equipped with a common interoperability interface, listed in [30]. This interface exports the model output containing both the behavior and the input parameters of a simulation those are practically the calculation method and the initial values of equations. A simulation tool with the FMI interface can then read these models to simulate a particular behavior. This approach is therefore particularly interesting in that several models and several simulations can be mn in parallel (co-simulation), and, therefore, the overall behavior of a complex system can be represented and evaluated. 

It is proposed to mitigate the growth phenomenon by splitting up the model graph at the boundaries of the physical domains. These are identified by the different types of model interfaces (listed in... 

An interface list is the general name given to a list of interface constants, signals and/or variables that describe the information being exchanged between two sections of a design. The interface list will contain a series of interface declarations separated by commas. Interface lists can be foimd in ... 

File objects may also appear in an interface list but are not supported for s)mthesis. 

The parameter list is a form of interface list (Chapter 5) that can consist of constants, variables and signals of mode In. This mode is the default and does not need to be specified. When the object type is not specified, a constant is assumed. Objects may be declared as unconstrained array types, allowing their length to be determined each time the function is called. Attributes such as LENGTH and RANGE can then be used inside the function to achieve this. The function body contains the description of the behaviour of the function. It has the following syntax. 

A parameter list can be constructed using both positional and named association. The latter is simply a clearer and less error-prone way of passing the parameters to a function. Parameter lists and interface lists in general were discussed in Chapter 5. 

A dock signal must be passed to a procedure as a signal. This must be specified in the interface list as ofiierwise it will default to a constant. 

When mixing named and positional association in an interface list the positional association must come first. The function calls below illustrates this. 

The first is used to create ZERO REG and SIN REG (the communications port Sin). The zero register is assigned its value using the Others clause, introduced in Chapter 5. Note that the assignment is not made in the port parameter list itself but instead the signal ZERO is used. The rules for all types of interface lists were discussed in Chapter 5. 

The HyperChem program from Hypercube Inc. and UniChem from Oxford Molecular can be used as graphic interfaces to Q-Chem. At the time we conducted our tests, it was not yet available on all the platforms listed as being supported. The current version is well designed for ground- and excited-state calculations on small or large organic molecules. 

The functionality available in MedChem Explorer is broken down into a list of available computational experiments, including activity prediction, align/ pharmacophore, overlay molecules, conformer generation, property calculation, and database access. Within each experiment, the Web system walks the user through a series of questions that must be answered sequentially. The task is then submitted to a remote server, where it is performed. The user can view the progress of the work in their Web browser at any time. Once complete, the results of the calculation are stored on the server. The user can then run subsequent experiments starting with those results. The Web interface includes links to help pages at every step of the process. 

Test data are available for two experiments at different impact velocities in this configuration. In one of the tests the projectile impact velocity was 1.54 km/s, while in the second the impact velocity was 2.10 km/s. This test was simulated with the WONDY [60] one-dimensional Lagrangian wave code, and Fig. 9.21 compares calculated and measured particle velocity histories at the sample/window interface for the two tests [61]. Other test parameters are listed at the top of each plot in the figure. 

The above discussion has tacitly assumed that it is only molecular interactions which lead to adhesion, and these have been assumed to occur across relatively smooth interfaces between materials in intimate contact. As described in typical textbooks, however, there are a number of disparate mechanisms that may be responsible for adhesion [9-11,32]. The list includes (1) the adsorption mechanism (2) the diffusion mechanism (3) the mechanical interlocking mechanism and (4) the electrostatic mechanism. These are pictured schematically in Fig. 6 and described briefly below, because the various semi-empirical prediction schemes apply differently depending on which mechanisms are relevant in a given case. Any given real case often entails a combination of mechanisms. 

Failure Mode. T1 rHA team lists each equipment item and interface faili ch... 

A statement of work which you require the subcontractor to perform - it might be design, development, management, or verification work and will include a list of required deliverables such as project plans, quality plans, production plans, drawings, test data, etc. You need to be clear as to the interfaces both organizationally and technically (see Part 2 Chapter 4). 

Interfaces between water and a variety of different inorganic solids have been investigated by simulation methods. In the following, a brief review of key references and findings is given. The list of references is not necessarily complete and the interested reader should consult the work cited and references therein in order to find out more about the subject. 

This is a list of ergonomic considerations that should be taken into account in the interface design of computer controlled processes. The principles refer essentially to monitoring and control tasks, and they have been derived from a literature review supplemented by the analysis of a number of incidents. Advantages... 

For each application, the LC and GC conditions are listed, together with the type of interface used, and some additional comments on the technique employed and the detection method. 

Giass/Resin interface Patent Survey, Patent List, and General Bibliography , PLASTEC Rept... 

To investigate the interface between polymeric materials, i.e. a so-called buried interfaces, several techniques are available schematically shown in Fig. 4 and listed in Table 2. They have quite different characteristics and depth resolution depending... 

So important are lattice imperfections in the reactions of solids that it is considered appropriate to list here the fundamental types which have been recognized (Table 1). More complex structures are capable of resolution into various combinations of these simpler types. More extensive accounts of crystal defects are to be found elsewhere [1,26,27]. The point which is of greatest significance in the present context is that each and every one of these types of defect (Table 1) has been proposed as an important participant in the mechanism of a reaction of one or more solids. In addition, reactions may involve structures identified as combinations of these simplest types, e.g. colour centres. The mobility of lattice imperfections, which notably includes the advancing reaction interface, provides the means whereby ions or molecules, originally at sites remote from crystal imperfections and surfaces, may eventually react. 

---