Real Cases

Following are few examples of real cases of fatigue fracture appearance that may shed some light on the causes that have led to fatigue failure  

Service fracture of 4130 steel shaft with sharp circumferential notch subjected to unidirectional bending fatigue. Fig. 2.19a [22]. Fatigue initiated on the lower part where metal fibers were in traction. Beach marks, due to oxidation when 

2 Morphological Aspects of Fatigue Crack Formation and Growth 

High temperature fatigue failure under axial loads of a valve stem of 21-2 valve steel (21 % Cr, 2 % Ni, 8 % Mn, 0.5 % C, 0.3 N) in solution-treated and aged condition and faced with stellite 12 alloy (30 % Cr, 8 % V, 1.35 % C, rem Co), Fig. 2.20 [24]. Note the ratchet marks around the circumference that denote the presence of multiple initiation sites (indicated by arrows). The wavy shape of beach marks is indicative of oflF-axis load that has introduced a bending component. 

Torsion fatigue failure of an axle of low carbon steel containing two holes, Fig. 2.21 [25]. Fatigue cracks initiated from holes that represent points of stress concentration. To feed the cracks has been traction principal stress acting on a plane at 45° to the axis (see Fig. 2.15a). The presence of two cracks at right 

---

This is never the case for a real data set, which displays a deviation di for each data point owing to experimental error. For the real case. 

Eq. (2-6), but also adversely affects surface film formation. Figure 17-2 shows the relation between protection current density and steaming velocity. Factor Fj relates to undisturbed film formation. The influence of flow is not very great in this case. Factor F2 represents the real case where surface films are damaged by abrasion [15]. The protection current density can rise to about 0.4 A m at uncoated areas. 

The above discussion has tacitly assumed that it is only molecular interactions which lead to adhesion, and these have been assumed to occur across relatively smooth interfaces between materials in intimate contact. As described in typical textbooks, however, there are a number of disparate mechanisms that may be responsible for adhesion [9-11,32]. The list includes (1) the adsorption mechanism (2) the diffusion mechanism (3) the mechanical interlocking mechanism and (4) the electrostatic mechanism. These are pictured schematically in Fig. 6 and described briefly below, because the various semi-empirical prediction schemes apply differently depending on which mechanisms are relevant in a given case. Any given real case often entails a combination of mechanisms. 

Data are available only for simple building geometries. In Allard," a tool for the calculation of wind pressure coefficients for simple geometries is made available, and another tool is described in Knoll et al. Existing wind pressure data have to be examined carefully, because many data represent peak pressure values needed for static building analysis. Real cases with obstructions and buildings in the close surroundings are difficult to handle. Wind-tunnel tests on scale models or CFD analysis will be required. 

Clearly, proximity and orientation play a role in enzyme catalysis, but there is a problem with each of the above comparisons. In both cases, it is impossible to separate true proximity and orientation effects from the effects of entropy loss when molecules are brought together (described the Section 16.4). The actual rate accelerations afforded by proximity and orientation effects in Figures 16.14 and 16.15, respectively, are much smaller than the values given in these figures. Simple theories based on probability and nearest-neighbor models, for example, predict that proximity effects may actually provide rate increases of only 5- to 10-fold. For any real case of enzymatic catalysis, it is nonetheless important to remember that proximity and orientation effects are significant. 

At one extreme, one has the structural models of perfect crystals, which have long-range positional order for all the atoms (apart thermal motion). A diffraction experiment on a set of such crystals oriented in one direction (corresponding, in most real cases of polymeric materials, to an oriented fiber) would result in a pattern of sharp reflections organized in layer lines. 

Fig. 3.10 Variation of the spectrometer aperture as a function of the source motion for Mossbauer spectrometers operated in constant acceleration mode with triangular velocity profile, and the resulting nonlinear baseline distortion of the unfolded raw spectra. For simplicity a point-source is adopted, in contrast to most real cases (Rib mm active spot for Co in Rh)...

The physicochemical forces between colloidal particles are described by the DLVO theory (DLVO refers to Deijaguin and Landau, and Verwey and Overbeek). This theory predicts the potential between spherical particles due to attractive London forces and repulsive forces due to electrical double layers. This potential can be attractive, or both repulsive and attractive. Two minima may be observed The primary minimum characterizes particles that are in close contact and are difficult to disperse, whereas the secondary minimum relates to looser dispersible particles. For more details, see Schowalter (1984). Undoubtedly, real cases may be far more complex Many particles may be present, particles are not always the same size, and particles are rarely spherical. However, the fundamental physics of the problem is similar. The incorporation of all these aspects into a simulation involving tens of thousands of aggregates is daunting and models have resorted to idealized descriptions. 

In the example above, the solutions are assumed to be well stirred and mixed the aqueous resistance is negligible, and the membrane is the only transport barrier. However, in any real case, the solutions on both sides of the membrane become less and less stirred as they approach the surface of the membrane. The aqueous diffusion resistance, therefore, very often needs to be considered. For example, for very highly permeable drugs, the resistance to absorption from the gastrointestinal tract is mainly aqueous diffusion. In the section, we give a general solution to steady diffusion across a membrane with aqueous diffusion resistance [5],... 

Modeling of evaluative and real environments should be viewed as complementary. Evaluative models are particularly suitable for assessment of new chemicals, for comparing chemicals, and for obtaining general chemical behavior profiles. Real models are obviously best used for elucidating the actual or potential nature of contamination situations and remedial actions. The use of similar or identical calculation techniques in both is very desirable since success in the real case may lead to greater credibility in the evaluative case. 

A recent study published by Badema et al. in 2011 describes a combined method to investigate the toxicity of an industrial landfill s leachate which is based on a triad approach including chemical analyses, risk assessment, and in vitro assays [17]. Moreover, to verify the applicability and the robustness of the proposed method, the approach was applied on a real case study a controlled, ISO-14001 certified landfill for nonhazardous industrial waste and residual waste from the treatment of MSW in northern Italy for which data on the presence of leachate contaminants are available from the last 11 years. 

It should be noted that Gaussian multiplication can severely distort peaks and also reduce signal-to-noise of the spectrum so it is not a good idea to do this if you have a very weak spectrum to start with. Spectrum 4.1 shows a real case where Gaussian multiplication has been able to resolve a triplet. Note that it is possible to just make out the triplet nature of the peak in the unmultiplied spectrum - Gaussian multiplication helps verify this and also allows us to measure the splitting pattern. 

One of the major goals of computational chemistry in the field of drug metabolism and pharmacokinetics (DMPK) is the prediction of oral availability. Several computational approaches have been published to predict this important parameter, starting from the molecular structure [1-3]. However, when applied to real case studies, none of these provided totally convincing results and, correspondingly, there is a lack of any general strategy to address this problem. 

In the real case, however, several phenomena, not included in the simple scheme of Fig. 15.6, limit the minimal useful temperature to about 10 mK, even if, as we saw in Chapter 6 and Chapter 7, refrigerators can reach much lower temperatures. 

Vapor flow through pipes is modeled using two special cases adiabatic and isothermal behavior. The adiabatic case corresponds to rapid vapor flow through an insulated pipe. The isothermal case corresponds to flow through an uninsulated pipe maintained at a constant temperature an underwater pipeline is an excellent example. Real vapor flows behave somewhere between the adiabatic and isothermal cases. Unfortunately, the real case is difficult to model and no generalized and useful equations are available. 

A hypothetical reaction with assumed properties was taken, since no real-case reaction was available for demonstration. Liquid-phase operation for a homogeneously catalyzed pseudo-first-order reaction was... 

Measurements with the latter real-case solvent system give a more complex picture. Even for the one-plate design, achieving uniform flow conditions in each channel is an open issue. Preliminary experiments show that high-temperature, high-pressure operation gives better flow uniformity, which is also advantageous to speed up the polycondensation reaction (see Fig. 10). 

Modelling of a real case reinforcement of PA 66 with short glass fibres... 

Of course, in real cases this simple method must be adequate to take into account the heat released due to the band shape and the Stokes shift. 

Deprotonation is a typical direction of cation-radical reactivity. Cation-radicals are usually strong H acids (e.g., the alkane cation-radicals pass its protons to the alcohol molecules Sviridenko et al. 2001). Bases that conjugate with these H acids are radicals RH+ —> H+ + R. Scheme 1.19 displays two real cases of this deprotonation (Neugebauer et al. 1972). 

The T2 condition, slightly strengthened from Ref. [5], but in the real case aheady contained in Ref. [4], is obtained by considering operators A = Sij,kPi OjOk and B = hiai for arbitrary real or complex coefhcients gij k and hi, with gij antisymmetric in (/, fe). (So this g may be compressed to... 

One may now proceed to write out y+y and w+w and, to make the connection to the present work, retain only the terms that are particle conserving. The result are representability conditions, and they include terms quadratic in/I and terms quadratic in/2, but no mixed terms. It will be clear then that the extreme conditions—and they are all that matter—involve either /I or /2, but not both moreover, one will observe that 0 < y+y and 0 < w+w lead to the same conditions, which are the real cases of the T1 and the strengthened T2 conditions. 

---