Implementation Analysis Report

We argue in this chapter that an implementation analysis should inform the entire life cycle of a standard, from the original specification, through derivation, to its implementation, use, review, and eventual revision or withdrawal. It will also be helpful to anticipate future uses such as the use of compliance assessments to compare regions and nations (where these are not in place already). 

Environmental and Human Health Standards for Water and Soil 

Early consideration of implementation options during the specification stage will ensure that resources are not wasted on deriving standards that cannot be used and will help to focus effort on the best solutions. 

---

The MARS software is adapted and compiled specifically for a given application. The software is organized into modules which can be interchanged as needed for a particular implementation. Most modules comprise a core of management, analysis, reporting, and plotting functions which are used for every implementation. For each application, a data acquisition module is adapted to suit the appropriate instrumentation. In addition, specialized analysis programming is added if required. The acquisition module, the core modules, and the specialized analysis modules, if any, are then linked into a customized application specific version of MARS. 

Requirements on a Safety Analysis Report when Unloading SFAs during Implementation of FSV Lepse Complex Decommissioning Projecf ... 

SG "REQUIREMENTS ON A SAFETY ANALYSIS REPORT WHEN UNLOADING SEAS DURING IMPLEMENTATION OF FSV LEPSE COMPLEX DECOMMISSIONING PROJECT" (SG-0I6-0I)... 

Ohlssen D, Price KL, Xia HA, Hong H, Kerman J, Fu H, Quartey G, Heilmann CR, Ma H, and Carlin BP. 2014. Guidance on the implementation and reporting of a drug safety Bayesian network meta-analysis. Pharmaceutical Statistics 13(1) 55-70. 

Implementation Guide for Use with DOE O 460.1A, Packaging. Preparing a Safety Analysis Report for Packaging in accordance with... 

As a part of the Unreviewed Safety Question (USQ) review, the proposed activity must be evaluated to the criteria set forth in the Technical Specifications and the Safety Analysis Report (SAR). Seismic concerns and designs are both covered by the Technical Specifications and the SAR and are addressed by the USQ process. The procedure further requires that the USQ evaluation be approved by DOE prior to implementation of the activity when a USQ is determined to exist. The requirement to use the USQ process applies to all systems thereby enveloping the requirements of restart criterion 3. 

The network is implemented by the participating countries through WHO. Sulfur Dioxide (SO,) and suspended particulate matter (SPN) data are routinely reported from each of the participating countries to WHO for entry into the global data base, which is maintained by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) at Research Triangle Park, North Carolina. Methods of collection and analysis varies by country. SPN is reported either as a gravimetric or a photometric (transmittance or reflectance) measurement converted to mass units. Since the accuracy of the conversion of the photometric measurement to mass units is... 

A general approach was developed by G.E.P. Box and G.M. Jenkins (S) which combines these various methods into an analysis which permits choice of the most appropriate model, checks the forecast precision, and allows for interpretation. The Box-Jenkins analysis is an autoregressive integrated moving average model (ARIMA). This approach, as implemented in the MINITAB computer program is one used for the analyses reported here. 

Much information pertinent to the above questions may already be available in the published literature, in the files of Government or Industry, in research reports of local universities, or in the knowledge of local citizens. A carefully planned effort should accumulate relevant information that is available. Usually, a fixed period of time should be allowed for the collection and analysis of this information. Then the design and implementation of the field measurements portion of the exploratory study should be undertaken. 

It is interesting to trace the development of instrument automation over the relatively brief period of the past ten to fifteen years. Early in this period, a truly automated instrument was a rare and expensive item built around a costly dedicated minicomputer. Automated data collection and analysis from any instrument which was not automated at the factory was usually accomplished by digitizing the data and storing it on a transportable media such as paper tape. These data were then delivered and fed to a timeshare system of some sort on which the data reduction program ran and which printed a report and sometimes a plot of the data. Often a considerable time delay occured between the generation and the analysis of the data. The scientist was at the mercy of the computer elite who could implement his data logger and provide the necessary computer resources to analyze his data. The process was expensive, both in time and in money. 

Lloyd et al.1 described automation processes for compound optimization and simultaneous implementation of (1) a LIMS system to automate and track the flow of sample information, data analysis, and reporting (2) an automated data archiving system to handle a large number of LC/ MS/MS data files (3) custom software to track a large number of protocol flows and (4) workstation automation. 

IEA Implementing Agreement on Advanced Fuel Cells, Annex V Fuel Cell System Analysis, Final Report, May 1995. 

---