Immobilization microencapsulation

Polyamide, collodion (cellulose nitrate), ethylcellulose, cellulose acetate butyrate or silicone polymers have been used for preparation of permanent microcapsules. This method offers a double specificity due to the presence of both the enzyme and a semipermeable membrane. Moreover, it allows simultaneous immobilization of many enzymes in a single step and the surface area for contacting the substrate and the catalyst is large. The need of high protein concentration and the restriction to low molecular weight substrates are the main limitations of enzyme microencapsulation. 

Enzymes can be immobilized by matrix entrapment, by microencapsulation, by physical or ionic adsorption, by covalent binding to organic or inorganic polymer-carriers, or by whole cell immobilization (5 ). Particularly impressive is the great number of chemical reactions developed for the covalent binding of enzymes to inorganic carriers such as glass, to natural polymers such as cellulose or Sepharose, and to synthetic polymers such as nylon, polyacrylamide, and other vinyl polymers and... 

A problem especially with oxidation catalysts is that the metals in their highest oxidation state tend to be less strongly associated with a support, so that the reaction conditions can lead to leaching of the metal complex from the support. To overcome this problem, microencapsulation, as an immobilization technique for metal complexes, has been introduced by Kobayashi and coworkers. In the microencapsulation method, the metal complex is not attached by covalent bonding but is physically enveloped by a thin film of a polymer, usually polystyrene. With this technique leaching of the metal can be prevented. In 2002, Lattanzi and Leadbeater reported on the use of microencapsulated VO(acac)2 for the epoxidation of allylic alcohols. In the presence of TBHP as oxidant, it was possible to oxidize a variety of substrates with medium to good yields (55-96%) and diastereomeric ratios (60/40 to >98/2) (equation 42). The catalyst is easily prepared and can be reused several times without significant loss in activity. 

A large number of metJiods for immobilizing biomolecules on the surface of solid substrate have been proposed in the past few decades, in which the molecules are immobilized on a carrier using covalent bonds ( i, ionic bonds (2), physical adsorption (3), cross-linkage of the biomolecules (4), or by microencapsulation (5). Immobilizing techniques are indispensable to treat biomolecules in an experiment. The provision of an immobilization process is one of the most essential processing steps that are required in order to obtain practical biomolecule carriers such as... 

Subsurface environmental conditions are suboptimal with low temperatures and low concentrations of growth nutrients. The decline of bacterial inoculae by protozoan predation is of major concern in soil (Acea etal., 1988 Acea Alexander, 1988 Casida, 1989) but may not be a factor in saturated subsurface environments. Immobilization of cells to carrier material may enhance microbial survival in the environment through control of predation and supply of nutrients and moisture. Stormo Crawford (1992) developed a cell immobilization technique for production of small beads (2-50 /rm) consisting of agarose and cells of PCP-degrading Flavobacterium sp. Microencapsulated Flavobacteria efficiently degraded PCP and survived for two years in soil columns at environmental conditions (Stormo Crawford, 1994). These results show that microencapsulation may be a very useful tool in in situ bioremediation. 

If enzymes are immobilized by copolymerization or microencapsulation, the intraparticle mass-transfer resistance can affect the rate of enzyme reaction. In order to derive an equation that shows how the mass-transfer resistance affects the effectiveness of an immobilized enzyme, let s make a series of assumptions as follows ... 

A very interesting technique that has been used widely in the MTO-catalyzed olefin oxidation reaction is the microencapsulation technique. This technique uses poly(4-vinylpyridine) (PVP), either 2% or 25% cross-linked with divinylbenzene (PVP-2% or PVP-25%, Fig. 4), as well as poly(4-vinylpyridine-/V-oxide) (PVPN-2%, Fig. 4). In addition, 2% cross-linked PS (PS-2%, Fig. 4, X = CH2) and a mixture of PS-2% and PVP-2% (5 1, Fig. 4, X = N) have been used as support polymers. This approach is based on the physical envelopment of the Lewis-acidic MTO by the PS polymer, enhanced by interactions of the 7t-electrons of the phenyl rings with MTO. In the case of the pyridine-containing polymers, Lewis acid-Lewis base interactions between the pyridine moiety and MTO obviously play an important role. In the case of the PVP and PVPN polymers, MTO can be incorporated in the support matrix by mixing the polymer and MTO in ethanol to obtain the desired immobilized catalyst. 

Abstract. Microencapsulation is widely use in industry but remains relatively unknown from the public. The reason is that microcapsules are not an end-product, but generally a technique to overcome process limitations. Microencapsulation allows immobilization, protection, release and functionalisation of active ingredients. Despite the high diversity of methods, this paper proposes a classification and description of the main technologies to produce microcapsules. 

In the last few years, one could see the development of commercial products based on microcapsules. However, microencapsulation has been widely used in industry for several decades. The principle of encapsulation is very old. If biochemistry is a principle of life, nothing would have been possible without its integration in membrane bound structures (cells, mitochondria...). Without immobilization and spatial organization of biochemical reactions in an internal volume and through the membrane would not be possible. The high efficiency of, for example ATP production, would not be possible. 

Chemical stabilization is the alteration of the chemical form of the contaminants to make them resistant to aqueous leaching. Solidification/Stabilization processes are formulated to minimize the solubility of metals by controlling pH and alkalinity. Entrapment or microencapsulation may immobilize anions, which are more difficult to bind in insoluble compounds. Chemical stabilization of organic compounds maybe possible, but the mechanisms involved are poorly understood [22]. 

An approach to immobilization which has recently become popular is microencapsulation in polymers, such as polystyrene and polyurea, developed by the groups of Kobayashi [34] and Ley [35], respectively. For example, microencapsulation of palladium salts or palladium nanoparticles in polyurea microcapsules... 

As discussed in Chapter 16, chemical stabilization is a result of conversion of contaminants in a radioactive waste into their insoluble phosphate forms. This conversion is solely dependent on the dissolution kinetics of these components. In general, if these components are in a soluble or even in a sparsely soluble form, they will dissolve in the initially acidic CBPC slurry and react with the phosphate anions. The resultant product will be an insoluble phosphate that will not leach into the groundwater. On the other hand, if a certain radioactive component is not soluble in the acid slurry, it will not be soluble in more neutral groundwater, because the solubility of such components is lower in neutral than in acidic solutions. Such a component will be simply microencapsulated in the phosphate matrix of the CBPC. Thus, the solubility of hazardous and radioactive components is key to chemical immobilization. 

Macroencapsulation is used for large objects such as concrete debris that is contaminated, or structural steel that has fixed contamination. The chemical stabilization and microencapsulation work together to immobilize chemical constituents, while the macroencapsulation is used to physically encapsulate large objects. For this reason, we will discuss chemical stabilization and microencapsulation together and address macroencapsulation in a separate section in this chapter. 

As mentioned in Section 17.3.1, retention of quadrivalent actinide oxides within the phosphate matrix is not a major issue because these oxides are insoluble in water, and all that is needed is their microencapsulation by the phosphate components of the matrix. This was demonstrated in a number of studies on UO2 and PUO2 and their surrogate Ce02. If the actinides are found in a trace amount in the waste, their chemical form is not so important because the phosphate matrix immobilizes them very efiectively. For example, the wastewater in the case study given in Section 16.3.2.2 contained 32 pCi/ml of and 0.6 pCi/ml of The ANS 16.1 tests conducted on the waste forms with 18.6pCi/g loading of combined U in the waste form showed that the leaching index was 14.52. XCLP tests also showed that levels in the leachate were below the detection limit of 0.2 pCi/ml. This implies that microencapsulation of trace-level U is very efiective in the Ceramicrete matrix. 

The Na level in the original waste was 3.26 wt%, and its level in the waste form was 1.08 wt%. In the TCLP leachate, it was only 634 mg/1. This partial Na immobilization may be due to the formation of less soluble compounds, such as MgNaP04 H20, and their subsequent microencapsulation within the matrix. It is very difficult to identify such compounds by X-ray diffraction smdies, because they are invariably glassy phases and are only represented by broad humps in the X-ray diffraction pattern. 

The various case studies discussed in this paper demonstrate that CBPCs are a very versatile material for the stabilization of hazardous and radioactive waste streams. CBPCs chemically immobilize and microencapsulate the contaminants, and reduce leaching to levels that meet WAC at DOE sites. They are also suitable for the macroencapsulation of various contaminated objects. 

A novel type of polymer-supported Lewis acid, a microencapsulated Lewis acid catalyst was investigated by Kobayashi [117]. Sc(OTf)3 was immobilized on to polystyrene by microencapsulation—Sc(OTf)3 is physically enveloped by polystyrene and stabilized by the interaction between the jr-electrons of benzene rings and vacant orbitals of the Lewis acid. This microencapsulated catalyst was used successfully in several Lewis acid-catalyzed carbon-carbon bond-forming reactions (imino aldol, aza Diels-... 

Enzymes may be immobilized by encapsulation in nonpermanent (e.g., liposomes) or permanent (e.g., nylon) microcapsules. The enzyme is trapped inside by a semi-permeable membrane, where substrates and products are small enough to freely diffuse across the boundary. While nonpermanent microcapsules are useful in biochemical research, only permanent microencapsulations yield analytically useful systems, because of their mechanical stability. 

The enhanced chemiluminescense obtained with the horseradish peroxidase-H202-luminol (139) system was applied to the development of a CLD biosensor for p-iodophenol, coumaric acid (26), 2-naphthol and hydrogen peroxide. The enzyme was immobilized by microencapsulation in a sol-gel matrix. LOD for the phenolic compounds were 0.83 p,M, 15 nM and 48 nM, respectively. A remote version of the enhanced biosensor was designed by directly immobilizing the enzyme on the tip of an optical fiber. This model was used for H2O2 assay. LOD was 52.2 p,M, with RSD 4.7% (w = 4) °. A bioluminescent response was obtained for phenols with pA a > 7 in the presence of a recombinant Escherichia coli strain, DPD2540, containing a fabA luxCDABE fusion this behavior may have analytical applications. 

Supporting material for clinical analysis, cell immobilization Cell encapsulation and immobilization, immobilization of enzymes, controlled release, injectable microcapsules Microencapsulation, thermoreversible gelation Lubrication applications... 

Lee outlines three different physical methods that are commonly utilized for enzyme immobilization. Enzymes can be adsorbed physically onto a surface-active adsorbent, and adsorption is the simplest and easiest method. They can also be entrapped within a cross-linked polymer matrix. Even though the enzyme is not chemically modified during such entrapment, the enzyme can become deactivated during gel formation and enzyme leakage can be problematic. The microencapsulation technique immobilizes the enzyme within semipermeable membrane microcapsules by interfacial polymerization. All of these methods for immobilization facilitate the reuse of high-value enzymes, but they can also introduce external and internal mass-transfer resistances that must be accounted for in design and economic considerations. 

Both chemical and physical methods may be used to immobilize biocatalysts while retaining or modifying their activity, selectivity, or stability. Among the techniques used for immobilization of enzymes are physical adsorption, covalent bonding, ionic binding, chelation, cross-linking, physical entrapment, microencapsulation, and retention in permselective membrane reactors. The mode of immobilization employed for a particular application depends not only on the specific choice of enzyme and support, but also on the constraints imposed by the microenvironment associated with the application. 

S. Kobayashi, R. Akiyama, Renaissance of immobilized catalysts. New types of polymer-supported catalysts, microencapsulated catalysts, which enable environmentally benign and powerful high-throughput organic synthesis, Ghent. Commun. (2003) 449. 

---