Hypothesis testing expectation

Hypothesis testing In classical statistics, a formal procedure for testing the longterm expected truth of a stated hypothesis. The statistical method involves comparison of two or more sets of sample data. On the basis of an expected distribution of the data, the test leads to a decision on whether to accept the null hypothesis (usually that there is no difference between the samples) or to reject that hypothesis and accept an alternative one (usually that there is some difference between the samples). 

Equation (3), which is an application of Bayes theorem, is referred to as the Positive Predictive Value. The parameter p is unknown but believed to be very small (<0.01) for large virtual libraries. 1 - p is the power (or 1 - type II error, where ft is the false negative error rate) and a is the type I error, also called the size of a test in the hypothesis testing context, or the false positive error rate. The last equation defines the probability that a molecule is determined to be a hit in a biochemical assay given that the virtual screen predicts the molecule to be a hit. This probability is of great interest because it is valuable to have an estimate of the hit rate one can expect for a subset of molecules that are selected by a virtual screen. 

We formulate the hypothesis that there is no association of number of accidents with shift, and proceed to test it with the x test. On our hypothesis the expectations for the three classes are 5, 5, and 5 respectively. 

Again testing our hypothesis that there is no association of accidents with shift, the total number of accidents is 30, and on this hypothesis the expectation E for each category is 10. 

We wish to test the h3 othesis that there is no association of frequency of choking with method of loading, i.e that frequency of choking is independent of method of loading. On this hypothesis the expectation of a oke, the same for all methods, is given by 32/40 = 0.80 chokes per cycle. The third row in Table 5.1 gives the expectation for the four methods. We have therefore 1.8 ... 

Because of its many assumptions, a population model, especially with all the pre-specification demanded in this framework, is unlikely to be true. However, one can argue that this framework exerts the influence of model misspecification primarily on study power. This is because a misspecified model would generally result in lower power although not larger Type I error. In addition, this approach maintains a more realistic confidence interval width instead of an overly optimistic (short) one. By maximizing the model as much as data can be expected to support, the impact on Type I error is minimized. Therefore, the hypothesis test is made as conservative as possible, and thus suitable for BE assessment. 

As Talias (2007) has pointed out, there is an interesting analogy between the Pearson Index and the Neyman-Pearson lemma. (The Pearsons in question are different. Alan Pearson is the author of the Pearson index and Egon Pearson, 1895-1980, was the son of Karl Pearson, 1857-1936 and the collaborator of Jerzey Neyman, 1894-1981, in developing hypothesis testing.) Both are relevant to optimizing a function subject to a constraint. In the case of the Pearson index this is profit subject to total cost, and for the Neyman-Pearson lemma it is power subject to the constraint of an overall type I error rate. In both cases a ratio plays a key role. For the Neyman-Pearson lemma this is the likelihood ratio and for the Pearson index the index itself is a ratio of expected profit to expected cost. 

If we use the notation Z /2( Z /2) lo indicate the value of Z corresponding to an area a/2 under the distribution falling to the right (left) of Z, 2 i ai2) then we can associate the cross-hatched area shown in Figure 2 with the region in which 100(1 - a)% of aU random variables, characterized by the standard normal density function /(2) with mean p = 0 and variance cl = 1, are expected to lie. Within the context of a hypothesis test, this area wUl be called the acceptance region and the... 

Expected present worth, 2367-2368 Expected project life, 2392 Expected value (EV), 2304 decision rule, 2177 maximization of, 2181 and SEU, 2182-2183 Expense work, standards for, 1459, 1461 Experiential learning, 938 Experimental design, 2225-2239. See also Hypothesis testing analysis of, 2232-2234 blocking in, 2228 checklist for, 2226... 

E Expected value (weighted average) in decision-making G. Hypothesis testing... 

Much of Statistics is concerned with statistical analysis that is mainly founded on statistical inference or hypothesis testing. This involves having a Null Hypothesis (Ho) which is a statement of null effect, and an Alternative Hypothesis (Hi) which is a statement of effect. A test of significance allows us to decide which of the two hypotheses (Ho or Hi) we should accept. We say that a result is significant at the 5% level if the probability that the discrepancy between the actual data and what is expected assuming the null hypothesis is true has probability less that 0.05 of... 

PSP on continuous scales also enables hypothesis testing. Classical ANOVAs (Analysis of Variances) applied to descriptive analysis can be used to infer significant differences between products, which is very convenient. Ongoing studies are also looking for the apphcation of the Mixed Assessor Model (MAM Brockhoflf et al, 2012) in order to take into account the expected high scaling effect between subjects (especially untrained subjects). 

Hypothesis Test To formulate a statistical test, usually some theory has been proposed. The question of interest is simplified into two competing hypotheses (claims), the null hypothesis H, and the alternative hypothesis Hj, that are not treated on an equal basis since special consideration is given to the null hypothesis. Thus, the outcome of a hypothesis test is either reject H, in favour of Hj or do not rej ect H, the result of a statistical hypothesis test is never reject Hj and in particular is never accept Hj . The result do not reject H, does not necessarily mean that Hg is true, it only suggests that there is not sufficient evidence against H, in favour of Hj the result reject Hg does, however, suggest that the alternative hypothesis Hj may be true. The hypotheses are often statements about population parameters like expected mean value and variance. 

Comparing two standard deviations with the F test is an example of what statisticians call a hypothesis test. The null hypothesis is that the two sets of measurements are drawn at random from populations with the same standard deviation. Because of random variation in all measurements, the observed standard deviations of the two sets are not expected to be equal. Values of F in Table 4-3 are chosen such that there is only a 5% probability that the observed measurements come from populations with the same standard deviation. That is, when Fcaicuiated < f tabie. there is more than a 5% chance that the two sets of measurements come from populations with the same standard deviation. When Fcaicuiated > f tabie. there is less than a 5% chance that the two sets of measurements come from populations with the same standard deviation. We can be 95% confident that measurements come from populations that do not have the same standard deviation if > F bie- Now you should read Box 4-1... 

In that context, the expected outcome of the application of a leading indicator would be identified and declared and, in an appropriate time, be subjected to a cause-and-effect test. For example, assume that 5 million is to be spent on defined sales promotion initiatives and the goal established is to increase market share by 20 million. At a later date, the hypothesis test would determine whether the numerical goal for increased market share was or was not reached. If not, the premises on which the expenditure proposal was based could be called into question due to a lack of a positive cause-and-effect relationship. 

To apply a significance test, a hypothesis must be clearly stated and must have a quantity with a calculated probability associated with it. This is the fundamental difference between a hunch and a hypothesis test—a quantity and a probability. The hypothesis will be accepted or rejected on the basis of a com-oarison of the calculated quantity with a table of values relating to a normal istribution. As with the confidence interval, the analyst selects an associated e/el of certainty, typically 95%. The starting hypothesis takes the form of the null hypothesis Hq. "Null" means "none," and the null hypothesis is stated in such a way as to say that there is no difference between the calculated quantity and the expected quantity, save that attributable to normal random error. As regards to the outlier in question, the null hypothesis for the chemist and the trainee states that the 11.0% value is not an outlier and that any difference... 

Expected Frequencies n A predicted/re Mency obtained for an experiment based on theory, assumptions, models, etc. It is used in hypothesis tests and comparisons with the actual or observed frequency. In tests involving contingency tables, the expected frequencies are the frequencies that are predicted for each cell in the table, generally assuming that the variables and categories of the table are independent. 

Note that the hypothesis test (hi) returns 0 for the assumption thatLl =R1. This means that our assumption Ll = R1 is valid, or in other words, the differences observed in Ll and R1 are due to normal and expected variation. 

We looked at our data by sensor location and found that R2 contains bad data. We also found that L3 to be suspect, and it should be removed from analysis based upon not behaving as expected. Let us look at angle effects on our data. We will use cluster analysis here instead of hypothesis testing, or ANOVA, to show a different method from the Statistics Toolbox that can be used to identify differences in the data. 

---