Helmholtz interface model

The electrified interface is generally referred to as the electric double layer (EDL). This name originates from the simple parallel plate capacitor model of the interface attributed to Helmholtz.1,9 In this model, the charge on the surface of the electrode is balanced by a plane of charge (in the form of nonspecifically adsorbed ions) equal in magnitude, but opposite in sign, in the solution. These ions have only a coulombic interaction with the electrode surface, and the plane they form is called the outer Helmholtz plane (OHP). Helmholtz s model assumes a linear variation of potential from the electrode to the OHP. The bulk solution begins immediately beyond the OHP and is constant in potential (see Fig. 1). 

Now, the cosh function gives inverted parabolas [Fig. 6.65(b)]. Hence, according to the simple diffuse-charge theory, the differential capacity of an electrified interface should not be a constant. Rather, it should show an inverted-parabola dependence on the potential across the interface. This, of course, is a welcome result because the major weakness of the Helmholtz-Perrin model is that it does not predict any variation in capacity with potential, although such a variation is found experimentally [Fig. 6.65(b)],... 

In this review, we introduce another approach to study the multiscale structures of polymer materials based on a lattice model. We first show the development of a Helmholtz energy model of mixing for polymers based on close-packed lattice model by combining molecular simulation with statistical mechanics. Then, holes are introduced to account for the effect of pressure. Combined with WDA, this model of Helmholtz energy is further applied to develop a new lattice DFT to calculate the adsorption of polymers at solid-liquid interface. Finally, we develop a framework based on the strong segregation limit (SSL) theory to predict the morphologies of micro-phase separation of diblock copolymers confined in curved surfaces. 

A. 19.8 The Gouy-Chapman model replaces the double layer of the Helmholtz-Perrin model with the diffuse cloud of charge that was more concentrated near the electrode. One of its fundamental problems is that it ignores the effect of the dielectric constant of high-potential fields present at the interface. See Fig. 20.4... 

Fig. 2.3. Dipole orientation at an interface based on the Helmholtz capacitor model, p - dipole moment, a- charge, according to Dynarowicz (1993)...

A major field of investigation in modem colloid and interface science has been the search for a means to predict and determine the exact distribution of electrical charges at or near a solid-solution interface. Building on the original theories of Helmholtz, a model has developed that allows for a reasonable description of how the electrical potential behaves in relation to the distance from the solid charged surface. The model includes the disposition of counterions tightly bound to the surface (the Stem layer) and those more weakly held in the diffuse portion of the double-layer region. 

IHP) (the Helmholtz condenser formula is used in connection with it), located at the surface of the layer of Stem adsorbed ions, and an outer Helmholtz plane (OHP), located on the plane of centers of the next layer of ions marking the beginning of the diffuse layer. These planes, marked IHP and OHP in Fig. V-3 are merely planes of average electrical property the actual local potentials, if they could be measured, must vary wildly between locations where there is an adsorbed ion and places where only water resides on the surface. For liquid surfaces, discussed in Section V-7C, the interface will not be smooth due to thermal waves (Section IV-3). Sweeney and co-workers applied gradient theory (see Chapter III) to model the electric double layer and interfacial tension of a hydrocarbon-aqueous electrolyte interface [27]. 

The behavior of simple and molecular ions at the electrolyte/electrode interface is at the core of many electrochemical processes. The complexity of the interactions demands the introduction of simplifying assumptions. In the classical double layer models due to Helmholtz [120], Gouy and Chapman [121,122], and Stern [123], and in most analytic studies, the molecular nature of the solvent has been neglected altogether, or it has been described in a very approximate way, e.g. as a simple dipolar fluid. Computer simulations... 

Since the interface behaves like a capacitor, Helmholtz described it as two rigid charged planes of opposite sign [2]. For a more quantitative description Gouy and Chapman introduced a model for the electrolyte at a microscopic level [2]. In the Gouy-Chapman approach the interfacial properties are related to ionic distributions at the interface, the solvent is a dielectric medium of dielectric constant e filling the solution half-space up to the perfect charged plane—the wall. The ionic solution is considered as formed... 

A macroscopic model for regular air/solution interfaces has been proposed by Koczorowski et al 1 The model is based on the Helmholtz formula for dipole layers using macroscopic quantities such as dielectric constants and dipole moments. The model quantitatively reproduces Ax values [Eq. (37)], but it needs improvement to account for lateral interaction effects. 

Following the concepts of H. Helmholtz (1853), the EDL has a rigid structnre, and all excess charges on the solntion side are packed against the interface. Thus, the EDL is likened to a capacitor with plates separated by a distance 5, which is that of the closest approach of an ion s center to the surface. The EDL capacitance depends on 5 and on the value of the dielectric constant s for the medium between the plates. Adopting a value of 5 of 10 to 20 nm and a value of s = 4.5 (the water molecules in the layer between the plates are oriented, and the value of e is much lower than that in the bulk solution), we obtain C = 20 to 40 jjE/cm, which corresponds to the values observed. However, this model has a defect, in that the values of capacitance calculated depend neither on concentration nor on potential, which is at variance with experience (the model disregards thermal motion of the ions). 

The Gouy-Chapman theory for metal-solution interfaces predicts interfacial capacities which are too high for more concentrated electrolyte solutions. It has therefore been amended by introducing an ion-free layer, the so-called Helmholtz layer, in contract with the metal surface. Although the resulting model has been somewhat discredited [30], it has been transferred to liquid-liquid interfaces [31] by postulating a double layer of solvent molecules into which the ions cannot penetrate (see Fig. 17) this is known as the modified Verwey-Niessen model. Since the interfacial capacity of liquid-liquid interfaces is... 

FIG. 10 Schematic representation of the proposed surface model (a) the concentration and (b) the electrical potential profiles at the interface of the membrane and aqueous sample solution, x = 0 and 0 are the positions of ions in the planes of closest approach (outer Helmholtz planes) from the aqueous and membrane sides, respectively. (From Ref. 17.)... 

Fig. 4.1 Structure of the electric double layer and electric potential distribution at (A) a metal-electrolyte solution interface, (B) a semiconductor-electrolyte solution interface and (C) an interface of two immiscible electrolyte solutions (ITIES) in the absence of specific adsorption. The region between the electrode and the outer Helmholtz plane (OHP, at the distance jc2 from the electrode) contains a layer of oriented solvent molecules while in the Verwey and Niessen model of ITIES (C) this layer is absent...

An improved CHF model for low-quality flow The Weisman-Pei model was later improved by employing a mechanistic CHF model developed by Lee and Mu-dawwar (1988) based on the Helmholtz instability at the microlayer-vapor interface as a trigger condition for microlayer dryout (Fig. 5.21). The CHF can be expressed by the following equation due to the energy conservation of the microlayer (Lin et al. 1989) ... 

Thus, we now have a reasonable model of the interface in terms of the classical Helmholtz model that can explain the parabolic dependence of y on the applied potential. The various plots predicted by equation (2.18) are shown in Figures 2.5(a) to (c). The variation in the surface tension of the mercury electrode with the applied potential should obey equation (2.18). Obtaining the slope of this curve at each potential V (i.e. differentiating equation (2.18)), gives the charge on the electrode, [Pg.49]

As a result of the above considerations, the Helmholtz model of the interface now shows two planes of interest (see Figure 2.8). The inner Helmholtz plane (IHP) has the solvent molecules and specifically adsorbed ions (usually anions) the outer Helmholtz plane (OHP), the solvated ions, both cations and anions. It can be seen from Figure 2.8 that the dielectric in the capacitor space now comprises two sorts of water that specifically adsorbed at the electrode surface and that lying between the two Helmholtz planes. Continuing the analogy with capacitance, these two forms of water act as the dielectric in two capacitors connected in series. 

Figure 2Jt The double layer Helmholtz model of the electrode/clectrolytc interface.

The model is most vulnerable in the way it accounts for the number of particles that collide with the electrode [50, 115], In the model, the mass transfer of particles to the cathode is considered to be proportional to the mass transfer of ions. This greatly oversimplifies the behavior of particles in the vicinity of an interface. Another difficulty with the model stems from the reduction of the surface-bound ions. Since charge transfer cannot take place across the non-conducting particle-electrolyte interface, reduction is only possible if the ion resides in the inner Helmholtz layer [116]. Therefore, the assumption that a certain fraction of the adsorbed ions has to be reduced, implies that metal has grown around the particle to cover an identical fraction of the surface. Especially for large particles, it is difficult to see how such a particle, embedded over a substantial fraction of its diameter, could return to the plating bath. Moreover, the parameter itr, that determines the position of the codeposition maximum, is an artificial concept. This does not imply that the bend in the polarisation curve that marks the position of itr is illusionary. As will be seen later on, in the case of copper, the bend coincides with the point of zero-charge of the electrode. 

As with the jellium model, the main significance of these calculations lies in the physical insight that they give into the structure of the solution at the interface, and the origin of the Helmholtz capacity. 

The first simulations of the collapsar scenario have been performed using 2D Newtonian, hydrodynamics (MacFadyen Woosley 1999) exploring the collapse of helium cores of more than 10 M . In their 2D simulation MacFadyen Woosley found the jet to be collimated by the stellar material into opening angles of a few degrees and to transverse the star within 10 s. The accretion process was estimated to occur for a few tens of seconds. In such a model variability in the lightcurve could result for example from (magneto-) hydrodynamic instabilities in the accretion disk that would translate into a modulation of the neutrino emission/annihilation processes or via Kelvin-Helmholtz instabilities at the interface between the jet and the stellar mantle. 

Surface complexation models for the oxide-electrolyte interface are reviewed two models for surface hydrolysis reactions are considered (diprotic surface groups and monoprotic surface groups) and four models for the electric double layer (Helmholtz,... 

Helmholtz had proposed such a parallel plate capacitance model for the entire interface in 1853. 

B , while for an n-type semiconductor the reverse is true. An analog to the SCR in the semiconductor is an extended layer of ions in the bulk of the electrolyte, which is present especially in the case of electrolytes of low concentration (typically below 0.1 rnolh1). This diffuse double layer is described by the Gouy-Chap-man model. The Stern model, a combination of the Helmholtz and the Gouy-Chapman models, was developed in order to find a realistic description of the electrolytic interface layer. 

This leads to the Helmholtz model of the interface (Fig. 10.5) when the other contacting phase is a metal. The Helmholtz model of the interface predicts that the value of the double layer capacity (Q,) will be given by ... 

The Helmholtz model of the metal/electrolyte interface seems to be appropriate for such interfaces as Au/Na-/S-Al203. For example the interfacial potential across this interface can be varied by 8 V without appreciable continuous current flowing and over this potential range the measured value of Qi changes by only 20% (Fig. 10.6) (Armstrong, Burnham and Willis, 1976). In addition we note that ... 

Fig. 10.5 Helmholtz model of the interface between a metal and an electrolyte. The metal is shown with a negative charge (excess of electrons) which is balanced by an excess of mobile cations, the centres of which are one atomic radius from the surface.

One complication which may be present, when the Helmholtz model is in other respects appropriate, is that of specific adsorption. If one of the mobile species is to some extent chemically bound rather than being simply electrostatically bound to the metal electrode, Cji may show a dependence on the dc bias potential. Indeed this is the normal method of inferring specific adsorption. Another possibility in this case is that dl exhibits different high frequency and low frequency limits because at high frequencies the specific adsorption being an activated process is too slow to follow changes in interface potential. A further complication which is often present in real systems is the presence of an oxide layer on the surface of the metal electrode. Such an oxide layer can generate a potential... 

The appropriate model of the interface for e.g. Pt/LiCFaSOa-PEO depends on the concentration of charged species in the PEO. When the salt PEO ratio is less than 1 10 the Debye length will also be less than the size of a mobile charge. In this case again the Helmholtz model of the double layer will be appropriate. 

---