Heated objects, manipulation

Once the initial network structure has been defined, then loops, utility paths and stream splits offer the degrees of freedom for manipulating network cost in multivariable continuous optimization. When the design is optimized, any constraint that temperature differences should be larger than A Tmin or that there should not be heat transfer across the pinch no longer applies. The objective is simply to design for minimum total cost. 

Suppose the objective is to control the temperature of a bioreactor. The temperature of a bioreactor is measured by instrumentation and compared with a set-point value. Based on the difference between the measured and the set-point temperature, the flow rate of cooling water into a fermentor jacket is increased or decreased by manipulating a control valve of cooling water until the difference between the measured and the set-point temperature becomes zero. By repeating this operation, the temperature of a bioreactor can be kept constant regardless of changes in the outer temperature or from the internal generation of heat. 

The prior discussion assumes that the feed rate, feed composition, and heat content (enthalpy) are fixed. My purpose in presenting this review of the phase rule is to encourage the routine manipulation of tower operating pressures, in the same sense, and with the same objectives, as adjusting reflux rates. Operators who arbitrarily runs a column, at a fixed tower pressure, discards one-third of the flexibility available to them, to operate the column in the most efficient fashion. And this is true, regardless of whether the objective is to save energy or improve the product split. 

Electrically-heated Furnace.—The furnace (Fig. 62) is very simple to manipulate and free from the objections of the ordinary gas furnace it may be operated on the laboratory bench. It consists of three separate heating units (1, 2 and 3). Units 2 and 3 are used to heat the oxidising... 

During the course of the subsequent steps, we may find that we lack suitable manipulators to achieve the desired economic control objectives. Then we must change the process design to obtain additional handles. For example, we may need to add bypass lines around heat exchangers and include auxiliary heat exchangers. 

To control the economic objectives we must have measurements and manipulated variables. However, in the example reactors we have looked at so far it should be clear that tve have only a limited number of manipulated variables, especially after we have taken care of the heat management issues. How is it then possible to achieve any level of economic control of a reactor The answer lies in a concept introduced by Shinnar (1981) called partial control. In short it means that only a few dominant variables in the process (e.g., temperatures, key components) are identified, measured, and controlled by feedback controllers. Then, by varying the setpoints for the dominant variables, it becomes possible to position the process such that all the important economic variables stay within acceptable ranges. We will elaborate more on this important concept in the next section but first we introduce the classification of reactor variables used by Shinnar. 

Polymer reactor control then boils down to controlling all dominant variables to setpoint using manipulators with a fast response and then adjusting the setpoints of the controlled variables to achieve the desired economic objectives. The trick is to determine the dominant variables and manipulators in addition to their relationships. Some key manipulators are heat removal (for externally cooled systems) or conversion... 

Since we have two control degrees of freedom, our objectives in distillation are to control the amount of LK impurity in the bottoms product ( b.lk) and the amount of HK impurity in the distillate ( 5>Hk) Controlling these compositions directly requires that we have composition analyzers to measure them. Instead of doing this, it is often possible to achieve fairly good product quality control by controlling the temperature on some tray in the column and keeping one manipulated variable constant. Quite often the best variable to fix is the reflux flowrate, but other possibilities include holding heat input or reflux ratio constant. 

An interchanger would exchange heat between two process streams, such as a pre-heater on a distillation column recovering heat from the bottom stream to the feed stream, or a pre-heater on a boiler recovering heat from the stack gas to the combustion air. In these cases, the flow rates of the two process streams are set by other control objectives and they are not available as manipulated variables. Only one process stream temperature can be controlled, and this should be achieved with a bypass of that stream, as previously discussed. 

The symbols are P for profit, / for equality constraints, g for inequality constraints, x for optimization variables, y for dependent variables, and / (constant) for updated parameters. The objective function is a scalar measure of plant profit it is usually the instantaneous profit ( /hr), because the optimization variables do not involve the time value of money. Typical equality constraints include material and energy balances, heat and mass transfer relationships, and thermodynamic and kinetic models, and typical inequality constraints include equipment limitations limit compressor horsepower, and distillation tray hydraulics. The optimization variables are flow rates, pressures, temperatures, and other variables that can be manipulated directly. The dependent variables involve intermediate values required for the detailed models for example, all distillation tray compositions, flow rates, and temperatures. Because of the fundamental models often used in RTO, the number of dependent variables can be quite large, on the order of hundreds of thousands. 

Each Event has its name, which ideally should characterize the treatment (e. g., heat shock, cold shock, food deprivation, add chemical, dry, centrifuge, resuspend, wait). Since Event class objects can document many types of biological manipulations, protocol for an Event can include various types of descriptions (see also descriptions of Event subclasses) ... 

Feedforward control of a heat exchanger (shown in Figure 21.2a) The objective is to keep the exit temperature of the liquid constant by manipulating the steam pressure. There are two principal disturbances (loads) that are measured for feedforward control liquid flow rate and liquid inlet temperature. 

Assume that F, does not change and that F, = F. Then dh/dt = 0 and we have only the heat balance, eq. (4.5b). The inlet temperature 7) is the disturbance and the amount of heat Q supplied by steam is the manipulated variable. The control objective is to keep the liquid temperature, T, at the desired set point value, Tsp. 

Consider the CSTR shown in Figure 1.7. The reaction is exothermic and the heat generated is removed by the coolant, which flows in the jacket around the tank. The control objective is to keep the temperature of the reacting mixture, T, constant at a desired value. Possible disturbances to the reactor include the feed temperature T, and the coolant temperature Tc. The only manipulated variable is the coolant flow rate Fc. 

V.13 Consider the jacketed mixing tank shown in Figure PV.4. The content of the tank is heated with hot water which enters the jacket with a temperature 7, /. The objective is to control the temperature of the mixture in the tank by manipulating the flow rate of hot water Fh. 

---