Hazardous waste reduce hazards

The hazardous component of the treated wastes is eliminated treated wastes contaminated with metals may be disposed of as nonhazardous wastes, and mixed wastes may be disposed of as radioactive wastes, reducing disposal costs and liability concerns. 

The recycling option is less preferable and should be resorted to after all feasible source reduction options have been explored and implemented. Onsite recycling has a higher priority than offsite recycling because reducing transportation, storage and other handling of hazardous wastes reduces the risks to health and the environment. 

By eliminating waste, reducing solvents, and maximizing the yield of key intermediates, the innovative new sertraline process not only has significant economic and environmental advantages, but also eliminates the possibility that those hazardous materials could be the object of a hostile terrorist act. 

The objective of the incineration process is another important factor that influences reactor selection. It may be desired, for example, to destroy the hazardous components in the waste, reduce the hazardous components and then isolate them, or merely separate the hazardous components. The end product of waste treatment must be compatible with the type of ultimate disposal to be used for the waste sewage discharge, landfilling, deep-well injection, and so forth. For example, if the waste is to be disposed of by landfarming, the end product of the waste treatment should consist of biodegradable organic components. ... 

Many companies use worker—management teams, suggestion boxes, consultant surveys, suppHer training sessions, and other methods to reduce risk of injuries (see Hazard analysis and risk assessment). The principal regulatory burden falls on wastes and discharges which leave the plant (3,53,54). 

The surviving U.S. plants have embraced all types of waste treatment processes (see Wastes treatment, hazardous waste Wastes, industrial). The most desired poUution prevention processes are those which reduce the total amount of waste discharged. Treatment and disposal are less strongly emphasized options. Zero wastewater discharge faciHties and water recycling processes are becoming more common (55,56). 

Clean Air Act and its amendments ia 1970, 1977, and 1990 1967 Air Quahty Standards and National Air Pollution Acts and 1970 National Environmental PoHcy Act) (2) better waste disposal practices (1965 SoHd Waste Disposal Act 1976 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act) (see Wastes, industrial Waste treatment, hazardous wastes) (i) reduced noise levels (1972 Noise Control Act) (4) improved control of the manufacture and use of toxic materials (1976 Toxic Substances Control Act) and (5) assignment of responsibiUty to manufacturers for product safety (1972 Consumer Product Safety Act) (15,16). 

When antifreeze becomes unsuitable for use, either because of depletion of inhibitors, presence of corrosion products or corrosive ions, or degradation of the fluid, recycling and reuse of the antifreeze, rather than disposal, may be considered. Although ethylene glycol is readily biodegraded in typical municipal waste treatment faciHties, antifreeze disposal becomes problematic because the coolant may contain hazardous quantities of heavy metals picked up from the cooling system. Recycling may be economically preferred over coolant disposal and reduces the concern for environmental impact. 

Cutting ChemicalWastes—What 29 Organic ChemicalPlants Are Doing to Reduce Hazardous Wastes, Infonn, Inc., New Yoik, 1985. 

To reduce costs of the more expensive platiag solutioas and decrease the amount of hazardous or regulated material ia a waste stream, recovery and reuse of the drag-out is a common practice. This is done by closing off the water flow to the first tinse tank foHowiag the process tank, and periodicaHy... 

Reduce or eliminate the generation of hazardous waste as expeditiously as possible... 

Waste minimization generally considers all of the methods in the EPA hierarchy (except for disposal) appropriate to reduce the volume or quantity of waste requiring dispos (i.e., source reduction). The definition oi source reduction as applied in the Pollution Prevention Act, however, is any practice that reduces the amount of any hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant entering any waste stream... 

The treatment of waste is the third element of the hierarchy and should be utilized only in the absence of feasible source reduction or recychng opportunities. Waste treatment involves the use of chemical, biological, or physical processes to reduce or eliminate waste material. The incineration of wastes is included in this categoiy and is considered preferable to other treatment methods (i.e., chemical, biological, and physical) because incineration can permanently destroy the hazardous components in waste materials (Ref. 4). It can also be employed to reduce the volume of waste to be treated. 

Pohution prevention techniques must be evaluated through a thorough consideration of ah media, hence the term multimedia. This approach is a clear departure from previous pollution treatment or control techniques where it was acceptable to transfer a pollutant from one source to another in order to solve a waste problem. Such strategies merely provide short-term solutions to an ever increasing problem. As an example, air pollution control equipment prevents or reduces the discharge of waste into the air but at the same time can produce a solid (hazardous) waste problem. 

Equipment for Superfund Waste Shipment RCRA hazardous waste that has been spilled, improperly landfilled, or dredged from defunct lagoons is a CERCLA waste, more commonly referred to as a Superfuna waste. For clean-ups where offsite treatment is the chosen solution, soil is excavated and placed in 15-m roll-off box or dump body truck. The trucks may be lined with polyethylene to reduce... 

Processing of Hazardous Wastes As with conventional solid wastes, the processing of hazardous wastes is undertaken for three purposes (1) to recover useful materials, (2) to reduce the amount of wastes that must be disposed in landfills, and (3) to prepare the wastes for ultimate disposal. 

One of the primary concerns of all power plants is to ensure high electricity production and reduce hazardous and waste substances. In that way green electricity could be produced. It is essential to monitor the presence and movement of impurities in various measuring sites in air, water and soil [1]. The presence of hazardous species in these eco-systems, even at low-mg/1 levels, has negative effects for nature and human beings [2, 3]. 

Table 28-2 lists some of the currently used pretreatments and ultimate disposal methods for hazardous wastes (6). Pretreatment refers almost entirely to thickening or dewatering processes for liquids or sludges. This process not only reduces the volume of the waste but also allows easier handling and transport. 

Sol-gel. A limited evaluation of sol-gel coatings on stainless steel has been reported with the goal of reducing hazardous wastes and other environmentally undesirable materials [22]. In this study, the GTMS/TPOZ sol-gel discussed... 

It is important to note that EAF dust is a hazardous waste because of its high concentrations of lead and cadmium. With 550,000 tons of EAF dust generated annually in the U.S., there is great potential to reduce the volume of this hazardous waste. The motivation for reducing this waste not only lies with the cost of air pollution controls, but with the cost for disposal. U.S. 

---