Hazard degrees

Health hazard degree four (4), the most dangerous, is characterized by such chemicals as cyanogen, dimethyl sulfate, methyl parathion in xylene, beryllium and hydrogen flouride. 

Through the measurement of coal and rock physical and mechanical parameters, the no. 2 coal seam of Liyazhuang coal mine has medium impact tendency and no impact on the roof strata. Due to stress concentration, hazard of 2-228 island working face is rock burst risk, and the rock burst hazard degree is weak shock hazard. 

Gloves Used in Laboratories. Many styles of gloves, made with many different kinds of materials, are available. It is important to select the right glove to protect against the particular hazard. Degree of protection and dexterity vary considerably. There is no universal glove. 

The term risk is used in all languages, with a relevant definition as a hazard degree (potential) and its importance is unequivocally defined as a relationship between the probability of a negative event occurrence— harm, injury, accident, P, and the consequences following the damage, injury, accident, C as in ... 

Dow Fire and Explosion Index. The Dow Eire and Explosion Index (3) is a procedure usehil for determining the relative degree of hazard related to flammable and explosive materials. This Index form works essentially the same way as an income tax form. Penalties are provided for inventory, extended temperatures and pressures, reactivity, etc, and credits are appHed for fire protection systems, process control (qv), and material isolation. The complete procedure is capable of estimating a doUar amount for the maximum probable property damage and the business intermptionloss based on an empirical correlation provided with the Index. 

EinaHy, the penalties are factored into the original material factor to result in a fire and explosion index value. The higher this value, the higher the degree of hazard. 

The evaluation phase of industrial hygiene is the process of making measurements on some set of samples which permits a conclusion about the degrees of hazard. Before conducting an evaluation, it is necessary to make a number of choices of what and where to sample, when to sample, how long to sample, how many samples to take, what sampling and analytical methods to use, what exposure criteria to use in the analysis of the data, and how to report the results. These choices as a whole constitute the evaluation plan. The object is to find if one or more workers have an unacceptable probabiUty of being exposed in excess of some estabUshed limit. 

The danger of an explosion of a nitrated product generally increases as the degree of nitration increases, eg, trinitroaromatics are more hazardous as compared to dinitroaromatics or especially mononitroaromatics. Nitroaromatics and some polynitrated paraffins are highly toxic when inhaled or when contacted with the skin. AH nitrated compounds tend to be highly flammable. 

In the fire codes, the atmospheric boiling point is an important physical property used to classify the degree of hazardousness of a Hquid. If a mixture of Hquids is heated, it starts to bod at some temperature but continues to rise ia temperature over a boiling temperature range. Because the mixture does not have a definite boiling poiat, the NFPA fire codes define a comparable value of boiling poiat for the purposes of classifying Hquids. For petroleum mixture, it is based on the 10% poiat of a distillation performed ia accordance with ASTM D86, Standard Method of Test for Distillation of Petroleum Products. 

For dammable and combustible hquids, dash point is the primary basis for classifying the degree of fire hazardousness. NFPA Classifications 1, 2, and 3 designate the most to the least fire hazard hquids, respectively. In essence, low dash point hquids ate high fire hazard hquids. 

If possible, there should be measurement of the toxic effect in order quantitatively to relate the observations made to the degree of exposure (exposure dose). Ideally, there is a need to determine quantitatively the toxic response to several differing exposure doses, in order to determine the relationship, if any, between exposure dose and the nature and magnitude of any effect. Such dose—response relationship studies are of considerable value in determining whether an effect is causally related to the exposure material, in assessing the possible practical (in-use) relevance of the exposure conditions, and to allow the most reasonable estimates of hazard. 

AH volatile organic solvents are toxic to some degree. Excessive vapor inhalation of the volatile chloriaated solveats, and the central nervous system depression that results, is the greatest hazard for iadustrial use of these solvents. Proper protective equipment and operating procedures permit safe use of solvents such as methylene chloride, 1,1,1-trichloroethane, trichloroethylene, and tetrachloroethylene ia both cold and hot metal-cleaning operations. The toxicity of a solvent cannot be predicted from its chlorine content or chemical stmcture. For example, 1,1,1-trichloroethane is one of the least toxic metal-cleaning solvents and has a recommended threshold limit value (TLV) of 350 ppm. However, the 1,1,2-trichloroethane isomer is one of the more toxic chloriaated hydrocarboas, with a TLV of only 10 ppm. 

In selec ting the machines of choice, the use of specific speed and diameter best describe the flow. Figure 10-67 shows the characteristics of the three types of compressors. Other considerations in chemical plant service such as problems with gases which may be corrosive or have abrasive solids in suspension must be dealt with. Gases at elevated temperatures may create a potential explosion hazard, while air at the same temperatures may be handled qmte normally minute amounts of lubricating oil or water may contaminate the process gas and so may not be permissible, and for continuous-process use, a high degree of equipment rehability is required, since frequent shutdowns for inspec tion or maintenance cannot be tolerated. 

Toxicity is the ability to cause biological injuiy. Toxicity is a property of all materials, even salt, sugar, and water. It is related to dose and the degree of hazard associated with a material. The amount of a dose is both time and duration dependent. Dose is a function of exposure (concentration) and duration and is sometimes expressed as dose = (concentration) X duration, where n can vaiy from 1 to 4. 

Chemical Exposure Index (CEI) Chemical Exposure Index, 1994). The CEI provides a method of rating the relative potential of acute health hazard to people from possible chemical release incidents. It may be used for conducting the initial process hazard analysis and it establishes the degree of mrther analysis needed. The CEI also may be used as part of the site review process. 

The degree of severity of health, flammability, and reactivity is indicated by a numerical rating that rates from zero (no hazard) to four (severe hazard). The information is presented in a square-on-point (diamond) field of numerical ratings. Information is presented as follows ... 

The use of this system will provide a standard method of identifying the relative degree of hazard that is contained in various tanks, vessels, and pipelines. Suggested applications include ... 

For a detailed description of the degrees of severity of the ratings, see NFPA 704. Table 26-4 shows the system for identification of hazards. Figures 26-1, 26-2, and 26-3 show examples of arrangements for display of the NFPA 704 Hazard identification System. 

Toxicity is related to dose and degree of hazard associated with a material. Dose is time- and duration-dependent, in that dose is a function of exposure (concentration) times duration. 

Sometimes, as a last resort, it may be desirable to use a high degree of process containment or, possibly, abandon the process if the hazard is unacceptable. 

Except for areas with fire or explosion hazards (hazardous areas), motor enclosures are designed to provide protection to the internal working parts. The development or improved insiilating materials and finishes has affec ted the required degree of protection and consequently the design and classification of enclosures. Examples of several types of enclosures are shown in Fig. 29-4. 

It is important to identify areas in accordance with the expected degree of fire hazard to facilitate an appropriate and economical selection of electric motors. These areas, according to lEC 60079-10, are classified into three categories as follows. 

A normal enclosure is meant for a reasonably clean atmosphere and a relative humidity not more than 50% for LT and 95% for FIT indoor enclosures. Where the atmosphere is laden with fumes or steam, saline or oil vapours, heat and humidity, excessive dust and water or contaminated with explosive and fire hazardous gases, vapours or volatile liquids (Section 7.11) a special enclosure with a higher degree of protection is required as in lEC 60529 or lEC 60079-14. For non-hazardous areas, the enclosure can be generally one of those discussed in Tables 1. 10 and 1. 11, and when required can be provided with special treatment to the metallic surfaces. For hazardous areas, however, special enclosures will be essential as discussed in Section 7.11. 

---