Gradient elution instrumentation

In the pneumatic pumping system, the pressure (and not the flow rate) is maintained constant as variations in chromatographic conditions occur. Thus, a change in mobile phase viscosity (e.g. gradient elution) or column back pressure will result in a change in flow rate for these types of pumps. The gas displacement pump in which a solvent is delivered to the column by gas pressure is an example of such a pneumatic pump. The gas displacement system is among the least expensive pumps available and is found in several low cost instruments. While the pump is nonpulsating and hence, produces low noise levels with the detectors in current use, its flow stability and reproducibility are only adequate. In addition, its upper pressure limit is only 2000 psi which may be too low in certain applications. 

Reverse phase chromatography is finding increasing use in modern LC. For example, steroids (42) and fat soluble vitamins (43) are appropriately separated by this mode. Reverse phase with a chemically bonded stationary phase is popular because mobile phase conditions can be quickly found which produce reasonable retention. (In reverse phase LC the mobile phase is typically a water-organic solvent mixture.) Rapid solvent changeover also allows easy operation in gradient elution. Many examples of reverse phase separations can be found in the literature of the various instrument companies. 

The limit of detection for this instrument is about 10 pg/ ml for polystyrene in 2-butanone,163 which is close to two orders of magnitude higher than that of the deflection-type DRI. Moreover, the response of the ELSD is linear over only two decades in concentration.163 The ELSD is a useful backup detector when the DRI or UV detectors are not appropriate, e.g., when the UV absorbance or RI change is a function of copolymer composition as well as concentration or in gradient elution systems where changes in solvent composition cause drift in baselines of the UV and DRI detectors. Compounds about as volatile as the solvent are poorly detected by ELSD. 

Implementation of SFC has initially been hampered by instrumental problems, such as back-pressure regulation, need for syringe pumps, consistent flow-rates, pressure and density gradient control, modifier gradient elution, small volume injection (nL), poor reproducibility of injection, and miniaturised detection. These difficulties, which limited sensitivity, precision or reproducibility in industrial applications, were eventually overcome. Because instrumentation for SFC is quite complex and expensive, the technique is still not widely accepted. At the present time few SFC instrument manufacturers are active. Berger and Wilson [239] have described packed SFC instrumentation equipped with FID, UV/VIS and NPD, which can also be employed for open-tubular SFC in a pressure-control mode. Column technology has been largely borrowed from GC (for the open-tubular format) or from HPLC (for the packed format). Open-tubular coated capillaries (50-100 irn i.d.), packed capillaries (100-500 p,m i.d.), and packed columns (1 -4.6 mm i.d.) have been used for SFC (Table 4.27). 

Liquid chromatography has a number of different configurations with regard to technical (instrumental) as well as separation modes. The HPLC system can be operated in either isocratic mode, i.e. the same mobile phase composition throughout the chromatographic ran, or by gradient elution (GE), i.e. the mobile phase composition varies with run time. The choice of operation... 

Refractive index detectors are not as sensitive as uv absorbance detectors. The best noise levels obtainable are about 1CT7 riu (refractive index units), which corresponds to a noise equivalent concentration of about 10-6 g cmT3 for most solutes. The linear range of most ri detectors is about 104. If you want to operate them at their highest sensitivity you have to have very good control of the temperature of the instrument and of the composition of the mobile phase. Because of their sensitivity to mobile phase composition it is very difficult to do gradient elution work, and they are generally held to be unsuitable for this purpose. 

Some LC/MS users adhere to isocratic separation because of the myths around gradient elution (it is complex to develop and transfer between instruments and laboratories, it is inherently slower than isocratic methods because of re-equilibration, and other reasons summarized by Carr and Schelling6). A researcher may have a very good reason to use an isocratic method, for example, for a well defined mixture containing only a few compounds. The isocratic method would certainly not be useful in an open access LC/MS system processing varying samples from injection to injection. 

Define the gradient elution method for HPLC, tell what instrument component is needed for it, and tell how this method is useful. 

The traditional HPLC instrument is composed of two different parts the first part separates the components of the sample and the other part accomplishes the detection of the components separated. The part of the HPLC carrying out the separation contains a column, an injection device and the eluent delivery system (pump with filters, degasser and transfer tubing, eventually a mixer for gradient elution). One or more detectors, a signal output device coupled with appropriate software, are responsible for detection and primary data evaluation. Pumps deliver the eluent or the different components of the eluent into the column with a precise, constant and reproducible flow rate. 

Unimicro Technologies Trisep-100 (Pleasanton, CA) Capillary array instrumentation CEC, pLC, CZE Gradient elution, several detectors... 

INSTRUMENTAL ASPECTS OF GRADIENT ELUTION 5.5.1 Types of Gradient Instruments... 

The effect of the dwell volume on the retention times of analytes increases with decreasing retention factor at the start of gradient elution and with increasing ratio VpIV, and becomes very significant in the instrumental setup with the dwell volume comparable to or larger than the column hold-up volume, which is more likely to occur in micro- or in capillary LC than in conventional analytical LC (see Figure 5.4) [12]. 

---