Genetic code products

All of the 20 amino acids have in common a central carbon atom (Co) to which are attached a hydrogen atom, an amino group (NH2), and a carboxyl group (COOH) (Figure 1.2a). What distinguishes one amino acid from another is the side chain attached to the Ca through its fourth valence. There are 20 different side chains specified by the genetic code others occur, in rare cases, as" the products of enzymatic modifications after translation. 

Elastin is a heavily crosslinked biopolymer that is formed in a process named elastogenesis. In this section, the role of elastin and the different steps of elastin production will be described, starting with transcription of the genetic code and processing of the primary transcript, followed by translation into the elastin precursor protein and its transport to the extracellular matrix. Finally, the crosslinking and fiber formation, which result in the transition from tropoelastin to elastin, are described. 

If the genetic code in its present form still poses so many questions, the elucidation of its development three to four billion years ago will be even more difficult Some researchers feel that an exact reconstruction of the process of its construction may never be possible, while others see the genetic code as being purely fortuitous, a system which was frozen at some time in history. It appears plausible that the code, just like other organism properties, is the product of natural selection (Vogel, 1998). 

Model calculations indicate that the genetic code cannot be the product of chance, but that it was optimized by selection processes. Computer simulations show the insensitivity of the contemporary genetic code, since (in model calculations) it withstood errors better than a million other codons (Vogel, 1998). 

Fig. 8.1 Wong s evolutionary map shows possible relationships between code words. The codons in boxes correspond to today s code words (compare Table 8.1). The codons for Asp and Glu in dotted boxes refer to these amino acids in a very early evolutionary stage of the genetic code. Single-headed arrows refer to the biosynthetic relationships between precursor and product, while double-headed arrows refer to reciprocal formation possibilities. All pairs of codon units (irrelevant of whether they are linked by single- or double-headed arrows) differ only in one single base change (Wong, 1975)...

Mutations are often classified according to the effect they have on the structure of the gene s protein product. This change in protein structure can be predicted using the genetic code table in conjunction with the base sequence of DNA or mRNA. A variety of such mutations is listed in Table 1-4-1. Point mutations and frameshifts are illustrated in more detail in Figure 1-4-2. 

In marked contrast to the ribosomal biosynthesis of peptides and proteins where a biological production line interprets the genetic code of mRNA, many natural peptides are known to be synthesized by a... 

There is a tendency to reserve semisynthetic and totally synthetic methods for the introduction of bonds and residues that cannot be specified by the genetic code. The present chapter will concentrate on these aspects. However, semisynthesis can have a role to play even when building structures that are completely accessible to the genetic code. The first industrial challenge for the emerging technologies of total chemical synthesis, recombinant protein expression, and semisynthesis was the economic production of human insulin in pharmaceutically usable quantity and quality. The semisynthetic human insulin that was made from porcine insulin proved exceptionally convenient to produce, and was the first introduction to human insulin for very many patients. 

Clearly this means a complete rejection of the fundamental Darwinian principle of common descent. Also, he rejects mutation and natural selection as the mechanisms that produced species. Is this view also contrary to the universality of biochemistry, and in particular the monophyletic origin of life, to which most biochemists today would subscribe Probably yes but of course if one assumes an absolute determinism, then the laws of chemistry and physics would produce the same products at each different start. This goes against the notion of frozen accident and the unique origin of the genetic code. So, there was never a time on Earth with only one kind of species, and the development of species was parallel rather than sequential. Of course all these ideas are substantiated by arguments and data - for these, the reader should refer to the original sources. 

The amino acid sequence of the hormone is (NII2)-Ala-Gly-Cys-Lys-Asn-Phe-Phe-Trp-Lys-Thr-Phe-Thr-Ser-Cys-(COOH). Using the genetic code, it is straightforward to deduce an appropriate DNA sequence that would code for this polypeptide. For production of the hormone in E. coli, the gene fusion method was used. 

S-Adenosyl ethionine carries out ethylation reactions or ethyl transfer, and this is presumably involved in the carcinogenesis. Administration of ethionine to animals leads to the production of ethylated bases such as ethyl guanine. This may account for the observed inhibition of RNA polymerase and consequently of RNA synthesis. Incorporation of abnormal bases into nucleic acids and the production of impaired RNA may also lead to the inhibition of protein synthesis and misreading of the genetic code. 

Many of the known variations in the genetic code are found in genes of mitochondria and chloroplasts. It is easy to see why these genetic systems might be more plastic, since they frequently encode only 10-20 proteins. The remainder of the organellar proteins are derived by importing nuclear gene products. 

Despite the fact that only 20 amino acids (plus selenocys-teine and formylmethionine in prokaryotic systems) are known to be directly specified by the genetic code, chemical analysis of mature proteins has revealed hundreds of different amino acids, all of them structural variants on the original 20. This structural diversity, which greatly expands the chemical lexicon of proteins, results from posttranslational modification of the primary products of translation. Our knowledge of the nature and significance of enzymatic reactions that bring about these important alterations is still very incomplete. 

---