Darwinian principle

Clearly this means a complete rejection of the fundamental Darwinian principle of common descent. Also, he rejects mutation and natural selection as the mechanisms that produced species. Is this view also contrary to the universality of biochemistry, and in particular the monophyletic origin of life, to which most biochemists today would subscribe Probably yes but of course if one assumes an absolute determinism, then the laws of chemistry and physics would produce the same products at each different start. This goes against the notion of frozen accident and the unique origin of the genetic code. So, there was never a time on Earth with only one kind of species, and the development of species was parallel rather than sequential. Of course all these ideas are substantiated by arguments and data - for these, the reader should refer to the original sources. 

Metamorphosis, the process whereby one creature comes from one genome in two or three distinct forms called egg, caterpillar, and butterfly, is a well-recognized process because it can be observed during every phase. It is a prime example for phenotypical development by molecular design without guidance from Darwinian principles. 

Evolutionary computation approaches are optimization methods. They are conveniently presented using the metaphor of natural evolution a randomly initialized population of individuals evolves following a crude parody of the Darwinian principle of the survival of the fittest. New individuals are generated using simulated evolutionary operations such as mutations. The probability of survival of the newly generated solutions depends on their fitness (how well they perform with respect to the optimization problem at hand) the best are kept with a high probability, the worst are rapidly discarded. 

New methods of variable selection include evolutionary methods based on Darwinian principles including Genetic Algorithms and Genetic Programming... 

The profile can be obtained by deconvolution. Fomier transform followed by Monte Carlo optimization usually lead to noisy ID ESRI profiles. Recently, the nedc algorithm (GA) for minimization of the difference between simulated and experimental ID images was implemented the ath tages ate less noisy profiles, as shown in Figure 12, and the ability to automatically choose the best fit for the profiles. A typical GA is patterned after the Darwinian principle of reproduction and survival aea-tion of the initial population, calculation of the fit to experimental data, selection of the couples, crossover (reproduction), and mutation. The approach and terminology are adopted from biology and resemble fundamental steps in evolution. 

Of course, here is where the use of the vague term capable of helps, as it is probably meant to indicate that it may be just enough to look at the genetic material and see whether Darwinian-like mechanisms might, in principle, be operative - in other words, whether DNA and RNA exist, and behave as we know they should. However, then, more than a definition, we have a tautology - life must correspond to what we expect it to be. 

In summary, we see that the study of nonequilibrium systems gives us some understanding of the process of evolution. The appearance of a certain type of organization or order is through fluctuations and kinematic considerations. In general we cannot associate a strict optimization principle to evolution there is no strict Darwinian selection of the fittest. 

The consequences of this extremum principle, valid for Darwinian systems, are... 

All scientists agree that chemistry is the basis of life and with that preamble it seems almost certain that the first cells one sees in the Hadean stones are the first ones on earth their ancestors were the heat- and light-driven bio-reactors. The Darwinians see the same cells but because the (in principle unprovable) single origin is a creed of the model, they postulate that a single ancestor must have lived much earlier and mutated into all of the cells that are visible at this horizon. At this point the old hypothesis is defeated by the researchers in planetary sciences who do not see any biology-time before the time of the first massive invasion of the earth crust by cells. The hell fire of global accretion was too close for descent with variation . 

These pictures11 are simplified to provide an unobstructed view of one of the most important principles of the inanimate world. The power of the Genomic Potential Hypothesis stems from the realization that there is no purpose and no goal in all of this and that syntheses came about because of the predisposition of atomic and molecular structures for such reactions under certain conditions. In contrast to the chance-oriented Darwinian paradigm, this model invites experimental exploration. 

The search for connection between shape, structure, and function was posed by D Arcy Thompson in his book On Growth and Form first published in 1917 (Thompson, 1992). His book lets one reflect that complex forms or shapes in nature are not solely a consequence of Darwinian natural selection. They can be purely explained on the basis of geometry, physics, mathematics, and engineering and are guided by underlying physicochemical principles that drive organization of molecules to higher order structures (Ball, 1999,2004). 

It is obvious that such a ruthless all-or-none decision could neither be a consequence of random production nor result from interactions as they are responsible for chemical equilibrium, which always settles on finite concentration ratios. It is indeed the peculiar mechanism of the reproduction process far from equilibrium that accounts for the fact of survival, and this mechanism is even active when the competitors are degenerate in their selective values, that is, if they are neutral competitors. In this limiting case, considered to be very important for the evolution of species, Darwin s principle indeed reduces to the mere tautology survival of the survivor. Nevertheless, there are, even here, systematic quantitative regularities in the way that macroscopic populations of wild types rise and fall in a deterministic manner (as far as the process, not the particular copy choice, is concerned), which make it anything but a trivial correlation. This case of neutral selection has been called non-Darwinian. It should be emphasized, however, that Darwin was well aware of this possibility and described it verbally in a quite adequate way. The precise formulation of a theory of neutral selection, which then allows us to draw quantitative conclusions on the evolution of species is an achievement of the second half of this century. Kimura [2] has pioneered this new branch of population genetics. 

---