Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Transformation rule

Note the minus sign on the right side of Eq. (11-276), stemming from the relation (11-274). These transformation properties imply the following transformation rule of a one-negaton state under space inversion... [Pg.680]

Within the scaling concept the answer to the question, how physical properties alter with changes in scale, is of fundamental importance. For example, Fig. 37 shows two polymer chains which result from another altering of the scale (here, number of segments N) by a factor X = 2. Then the following transformation rules are valid for the monomer concentration c and the segment length /[5]... [Pg.73]

Introducing the function. 93 and using the second transformation rule in equation (8B.2) gives and reverting to the infinite sum, we get... [Pg.475]

If the second-order Hermitian matrix follows the transformation rule for a (2,2) tensor, then this decomposition is the only possible manner of expressing these matrices as a sum of simpler parts so that the decomposition remains invariant under unitary tranformations of the basis [73]. [Pg.215]

The transformation rule given in Eq. (2.166) is instead an example to the so-called Ito formula for the transformation of the drift coefficients in Ito stochastic differential equations [16]. ft is shown in Section IX that V q) and V ( ) are equal to the drift coefficients that appear in the Ito formulation of the stochastic differential equations for the generalized and Cartesian coordinates, respectively. [Pg.105]

The nontrivial transformation rule of Eq. (2.231) for the Ito drift coefficient (or the drift velocity) is sometimes referred to as the Ito formula. Note that Eq. (2.166) is a special case of the Ito formula, as applied to a transformation from generalized coordinates to Cartesian bead coordinates. The method used above to derive Eq. (2.166) thus constitutes a poor person s derivation of the Ito formula, which is readily generalized to obtain the general transformation formula of Eq. (2.231). [Pg.121]

Stratonovich SDEs, unlike Ito SDEs, may thus be manipulated using the familiar calculus of differentiable functions, rather than the Ito calculus. This property of a Stratonovich SDE may be shown to follow from the Ito transformation rule for the equivalent Ito SDE. It also follows immediately from the definition of the Stratonovich SDE as the white-noise limit of an ordinary differential equation, since the coefficients in the underlying ODE may be legitimately manipulated by the usual rules of calculus. [Pg.128]

Note that the term involving a derivative of In / in Eq. (2.331) is identical to the velocity arising from the second term on the RHS of Eq. (2.286) for the transformed force bias in the traditional interpretation of the Langevin equation. The traditional interpretation of the Langevin equation yields a simple tensor transformation rule for the drift coefficient A , but also yields a contribution to Eq. (2.282) for the drift velocity that is driven by the force bias. The kinetic interpretation yields an expression for the drift velocity from which the term involving the force bias is absent, but, correspondingly, yields a nontrivial transformation mle for the overall drift coefficient. [Pg.145]

As in Section H of this appendix, we restrict ourselves in this section to the case of a nonsingular mobility tensor. By combining Eq. (2.323) for the drift velocites in the original coordinate system with the Ito transformation rule for drift velocities, we find that the variables X, ..., X experience drift velocities... [Pg.185]

It may also be argued as follows that / and g are physical. If an attempt is made to apply the usual U(l) gauge transform rule to A ... [Pg.180]

Since the principal axes are the same for the stress tensor and the strain-rate tensor, the normal strain rates are related to the principal strain rates by the same transformation rules that we just completed for the stress. Thus... [Pg.55]

The transformation rules for the shear stresses apply also to the shear strain rates by analogy withEq. 2.172,... [Pg.56]

This is also the relation obtained in the hypothetical rest frame. Therefore, the B cyclic theorem is Lorentz-invariant in the sense that it is the same in the rest frame and in the light-like condition. This result can be checked by applying the Lorentz transformation rules for magnetic fields term by term [44], The equivalent of the B cyclic theorem in the particle interpretation is a Lorentz-invariant construct for spin angular momentum ... [Pg.140]

Group theory certainly offers an austere shorthand for fundamental transformation rules. But it appears to the present writer that the final judge of whether a mathematical group structure can, or cannot, be applied to a physical situation is the topology of that physical situation. Topology dictates and justifies the group transformations. [Pg.700]

Those situations in which the potentials are not measurable possess a topology, the transformation rules of which are describable by the U(l) group (see paragraphs 6 and 7 in the above list) ... [Pg.705]

The compression that is used to calculate the internal representation consists of a transformation rule from the excitation density to the compressed Sone density as formulated by Zwicker [Zwicker and Feldtkeller, 1967], The smearing of energy is mostly the result of peripheral processes [Viergever, 1986) while compression is a more central process [Pickles, 1988], With the two simple mathematical operations, smearing and compression, it is possible to model the masking properties of the auditory system not only at the masked threshold, but also the partial masking [Scharf, 1964] above masked threshold (see Fig. 1.5). [Pg.306]

Once a Jones or Mueller matrix of an optical element is obtained for one orthonormal basis set (ep e2, for example), the corresponding matrices for the element relative to other basis sets can be obtained using standard rotation transformation rules. The action of rotating an optical element through an angle 0 and onto a new basis set ej, e2 is pictured in Figure 2.3. In the nonrotated frame, the exiting polarization vector is ... [Pg.25]

Thus, the expansion (4.4) as well as overlap evaluation and transformation rules are sufficient to compute electron spin-spin contact integrals. [Pg.223]

These results permit one to see that the same will occur when the integral of an arbitrary number of CETO products centered at arbitrary sites (Aj) is to be evaluated. Any permutation of the functions in the product will leave the integral invariant and WO-CEITO transformation rules as well as overlap integral evaluation will be sufficient to obtain this kind of integrals. These characteristics, which are also present when using GTO functions, may appear interesting when dealing with Quantum Similarity measures [66b,d]. [Pg.224]

Tlrese transformations rules are in accordance with the invariance of the CNT under U if and only if... [Pg.326]

Forward transformation rules look for the context in source, target, integration document, and the non-context increments in the source document, as well as for all related edges. For each match, it creates the corresponding target document pattern and the link structure in the integration document. [Pg.240]

The derivation of a forward transformation rule from a link template is illustrated in Fig. 3.28, as an example, using the rule to transform a connection. Part b) shows the forward rule corresponding to the link template in part a). All dotted nodes (LI and TCI) and their edges are created when the rule is executed. To determine whether the rule can be applied, the pattern without these nodes is searched in the documents. Here, the already related ports and the connection in the PFD are searched and the corresponding connection in the simulation model is created. [Pg.240]

Then, for each half link the possible rule applications are determined. This is done by trying to match the left-hand side of forward transformation rules, starting at the dominant increments to avoid global pattern matching. In the example (Fig. 3.33 b), three possible rule applications were found Ra at the link LI would transform the increments 11 and 12 Rb would transform the increments 12 and 13 and Rc would transform increment 13. [Pg.247]

On the right-hand side, the conflict is marked by adding an overlap node (4 ) is inserted between the two rule nodes. Again, this production is marked with an asterisk, so it is executed until all conflicts are detected. Besides detecting conflicts between different forward transformation rules, the depicted... [Pg.250]

For forward transformation rules, a rule node belongs to one link only, whereas nodes of correspondence analysis rules are referenced by two half... [Pg.252]

The QVT Partner s proposal [509] to the QVT RFP of the OMG [875] is a relational approach based on the UML and very similar to the work of Kent [498]. While Kent is using OCL constraints to define detailed rules, the QVT Partners propose a graphical definition of patterns and operational transformation rules. These rules operate in one direction only. Furthermore, incremental transformations and user interaction are not supported. [Pg.266]

Transformations between documents are urgently needed, not only in chemical engineering. They have to be incremental, interactive, and bidirectional. Additionally, transformation rules are most likely ambiguous. There are a lot of transformation approaches and consistency checkers with repair actions that can be used for transformation as well, but none of them fulfills all of these requirements. Especially, the detection of conflicts between ambiguous rules is not supported. We address these requirements with the integration algorithm described in this contribution. [Pg.266]

Fig. 5.7. Transformation rules from C3 to the Activity Network (Petri net)... Fig. 5.7. Transformation rules from C3 to the Activity Network (Petri net)...
Figure 5.7 shows the C3 example model on the left and the transformed Petri net (implemented in Renew), which represents the Activity Network, on the right. The underlying basic transformation rules are given at the bottom... [Pg.458]

In the case study on integrator modeling (see Sect. 6.3, column (c) in Fig. 6.1) we find general specifications, either as a basic layer of the conceptual realization model in the form of graph transformation rules, or in a coded form as a part of the integrator framework. Specific models are introduced to represent link types, link templates, and rules of TGGs. Thereby, different forms of determinations for specific are introduced in one step. [Pg.633]

In a final step, a simulation model, implemented as a Petri net, was created according to the transformation rules described Subsect. 5.2.4. This model allows experts to assess workflow management variants in a simulation-based way. [Pg.667]


See other pages where Transformation rule is mentioned: [Pg.121]    [Pg.227]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.1161]    [Pg.700]    [Pg.703]    [Pg.711]    [Pg.678]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.100]    [Pg.555]    [Pg.634]    [Pg.674]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.121]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.18 ]




SEARCH



Atomic transformation rules

Electrocyclic transformations selection rules

© 2024 chempedia.info