Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

General Formulation of the Method

Leonard [97] was apparently the first to use the term Large Eddy Simulation. He also introduced the idea of filtering as a formal convolution operation on the velocity field and gave the first general formulation of the method. Since Leonard s approach form the basis for application of LES to chemical reactor modeling, we discuss this approach in further details. [Pg.167]

The formulations presented in this section are for the calculation of perturbed fluxes. Analogous formulations can be derived and applied for the calculation of perturbed adjoints, kernels for the integral transport equations (see Section IV), generalized functions (see Section V), and other distribution-function perturbations. The presentation is restricted to exposition of the general formulation of the methods, without considering the technical details of the solution. [Pg.192]

A general formulation of the problem of solid-liquid phase equilibrium in quaternary systems was presented and required the evaluation of two thermodynamic quantities, By and Ty. Four methods for calculating Gy from experimental data were suggested. With these methods, reliable values of Gy for most compound semiconductors could be determined. The term Ty involves the deviation of the liquid solution from ideal behavior relative to that in the solid. This term is less important than the individual activity coefficients because of a partial cancellation of the composition and temperature dependence of the individual activity coefficients. The thermodynamic data base available for liquid mixtures is far more extensive than that for solid solutions. Future work aimed at measurement of solid-mixture properties would be helpful in identifying miscibility limits and their relation to LPE as a problem of constrained equilibrium. [Pg.171]

Bemardi and Boys49 have examined the problem of the accuracy of the energy and other variables in this method, and give explicit formulae for improving the calculations. The original formulation of the method to cover the calculation of expectation values was given by Handy and Epstein in 1970.50 Armour 51 has examined the method of moments and the transcorrelated wavefunction method (which is a particular form of the method of moments) in some detail. Several expectation values were evaluated in the course of applications of the former method to H2, and in general fairly accurate results were obtained, but numerical problems can occur, and further study is needed. [Pg.88]

Formulation of the methods of computational chemistry is reasonably straightforward. The hard work comes in its implementation. We begin with the electronic Hamiltonian for a molecule, a generalization of that for a many-electron atom given in Eq (9.2) ... [Pg.263]

FD methods are widely used in combination with classical point charge description of the solvent (FEM is less used see You and Harvey, 1993, for a recent implementation of this approach). The first formulation of the method is due to Warwicker and Watson (1982) (see Davis and McCammon (1990) for a review). The use of 3D numerical grids makes the calculations generally computer intensive, and, in addition, the evaluation of AGei is rather inaccurate. [Pg.63]

Because of its size-extensivity and faster convergence with respect to excitation level Coupled cluster theory has replaced Cl theory as the dominant approach in ab initio correlation calculations. Like MBPT the theory is still mainly applied in cases where the exact wave function is dominated by a single determinant, but multireference methods have been formulated and begin to enter mainstream quantum chemistry. Generalization of the algorithms to the relativistic no-pair level can again be achieved via the spinorbital formulation of the methods. I will first discuss the single reference method and then consider the Fock space method [40] that uses multi-reference wavefiinctions for ionized or excited states. [Pg.321]

In any case, the general formulation of the MBPT—primarily due to Brueckner [31], Goldstone [32], Hugenholtz [33], and Hubbard [34]— has shed much lighten the structure of fully correlated, exact A-fermion wave functions, and was essential to the development of perturbative-type methods, including CC theory. For this reason, the next section is devoted to this topic. [Pg.119]

Cizek s 1966 paper [73] and the subsequent paper from the Frascati Volume [48], both resulting from his Ph.D. thesis, are often portrayed as a formulation of what is today characterized as the CCD (CC with doubles), which he referred to as the CPMET (coupled-pair many-electron theory) method. It is tme that the actual explicit equations that are given in his paper are the CCD equations. It must be emphasized, however, that the essence of the paper is an entirely general formulation of the CC method, and the CCD... [Pg.126]

Slater determinants are usually constructed from molecular spinorbitals. If, instead, we use atomic spinorbitals and the Ritz variational method (Slater determinants as the expansion functions), we would get the most general formulation of the valence bond (VB) method. The beginning of VB theory goes back to papers by Heisenbeig, the first application was made by Heitler and London, and later theory was generalized by Hurley, Lennard-Jones, and Pople. The essence of the VB method can be explained by an example. Let us take the hydrogen molecule with atomic spinorbitals of type liaO and Vst (abbreviated as aa and b ) centered at two nuclei. Let us construct from them several (non-normalized) Slater determinants, for instance ... [Pg.610]

Almost all analytical invesligafions into parallel channel and NCL instability are based on a subset of the general equations previously given. Munoz-Cobo et al. (2002) use a zero-dimensional approach, and Ambrosini et al. (2001) use onedimensional models, accurate finite-difference approximations, and numerical solution methods. Investigations based on a more general formulation of the problem are usually performed with computer models of the flow sitoation (Ambrosini and Ferreri, 2006). Data from experiments that were developed to test the less general formulations are used for validation exercises for the more general computer models. As time... [Pg.501]

In this section the basis elements of the volume of fluid (VOF) method are described. In general the VOF model is composed of a set of continuity and momentum equations, as well as a transport equation for the evolution of a phase indicator function which is used to determine the location and orientation of the interface. We distinguish between the jump condition—and the whole field formulations of the method, in which both forms are based on a macroscopic view defining the interface as a 2D surface. The jump condition form is especially convenient for free-surface flow simulations, whereas the whole field formulation is commonly used for interfacial flow calculations in which the internal flow of all the phases are of interest. [Pg.380]

Application of the weighted residual method to the solution of incompressible non-Newtonian equations of continuity and motion can be based on a variety of different schemes. Tn what follows general outlines and the formulation of the working equations of these schemes are explained. In these formulations Cauchy s equation of motion, which includes the extra stress derivatives (Equation (1.4)), is used to preseiwe the generality of the derivations. However, velocity and pressure are the only field unknowns which are obtainable from the solution of the equations of continuity and motion. The extra stress in Cauchy s equation of motion is either substituted in terms of velocity gradients or calculated via a viscoelastic constitutive equation in a separate step. [Pg.71]

Density. Most fillers added in rubber base formulation have a density between 2 and 2.7 g/cm-, except barium sulphate (4-4.9 g/cm- ) and zinc oxide (5.6 g/cm ). Addition of filler increases the free volume of the polymer and, in general, there is a critical concentration of filler at which the density of the formulation increases. The method of incorporation of filler in the adhesive formulation is important because air voids may appear when a poor dispersion is produced. [Pg.629]


See other pages where General Formulation of the Method is mentioned: [Pg.369]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.76]    [Pg.523]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.251]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.129]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.70]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.84]    [Pg.630]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.258]    [Pg.428]    [Pg.211]    [Pg.200]    [Pg.1109]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.1905]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.530]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.57]    [Pg.838]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.172]   


SEARCH



Generalized Formulation

Method Formulation

Methods of Formulation

© 2024 chempedia.info