Wave function fermionic

A symmetry that holds for any system is the permutational symmetry of the polyelectronic wave function. Electrons are fermions and indistinguishable, and therefore the exchange of any two pairs must invert the phase of the wave function. This symmetry holds, of course, not only to pericyclic reactions. 

As pointed out in the previous paragraph, the total wave function of a molecule consists of an electronic and a nuclear parts. The electrons have a different intrinsic nature from nuclei, and hence can be treated separately when one considers the issue of permutational symmetry. First, let us consider the case of electrons. These are fermions with spin and hence the subsystem of electrons obeys the Fermi-Dirac statistics the total electronic wave function... 

Since the total wave function must have the correct symmetry under the permutation of identical nuclei, we can determine the symmetiy of the rovi-bronic wave function from consideration of the corresponding symmetry of the nuclear spin function. We begin by looking at the case of a fermionic system for which the total wave function must be antisynmiebic under permutation of any two identical particles. If the nuclear spin function is symmetric then the rovibronic wave function must be antisymmetric conversely, if the nuclear spin function is antisymmebic, the rovibronic wave function must be symmetric under permutation of any two fermions. Similar considerations apply to bosonic systems The rovibronic wave function must be symmetric when the nuclear spin function is symmetric, and the rovibronic wave function must be antisymmetiic when the nuclear spin function is antisymmetric. This warrants... 

In this formulation, the electron density is expressed as a linear combination of basis functions similar in mathematical form to HF orbitals. A determinant is then formed from these functions, called Kohn-Sham orbitals. It is the electron density from this determinant of orbitals that is used to compute the energy. This procedure is necessary because Fermion systems can only have electron densities that arise from an antisymmetric wave function. There has been some debate over the interpretation of Kohn-Sham orbitals. It is certain that they are not mathematically equivalent to either HF orbitals or natural orbitals from correlated calculations. However, Kohn-Sham orbitals do describe the behavior of electrons in a molecule, just as the other orbitals mentioned do. DFT orbital eigenvalues do not match the energies obtained from photoelectron spectroscopy experiments as well as HF orbital energies do. The questions still being debated are how to assign similarities and how to physically interpret the differences. 

The most general statement of the Pauli principle for electrons and other fermions is that the total wave function must be antisymmetric to electron (or fermion) exchange. For bosons it must be symmetric to exchange. 

Systems containing symmetric wave function components ate called Bose-Einstein systems (129) those having antisymmetric wave functions are called Fermi-Ditac systems (130,131). Systems in which all components are at a single quantum state are called MaxweU-Boltzmaim systems (122). Further, a boson is a particle obeying Bose-Einstein statistics, a fermion is one obeying Eermi-Ditac statistics (132). 

The behavior of a multi-particle system with a symmetric wave function differs markedly from the behavior of a system with an antisymmetric wave function. Particles with integral spin and therefore symmetric wave functions satisfy Bose-Einstein statistics and are called bosons, while particles with antisymmetric wave functions satisfy Fermi-Dirac statistics and are called fermions. Systems of " He atoms (helium-4) and of He atoms (helium-3) provide an excellent illustration. The " He atom is a boson with spin 0 because the spins of the two protons and the two neutrons in the nucleus and of the two electrons are paired. The He atom is a fermion with spin because the single neutron in the nucleus is unpaired. Because these two atoms obey different statistics, the thermodynamic and other macroscopic properties of liquid helium-4 and liquid helium-3 are dramatically different. 

The A-particle eigenfunctions I v(l, 2,. .., A) in equation (8.47) are not properly symmetrized. For bosons, the wave function (1, 2,. .., N) must be symmetric with respect to particle interchange and for fermions it must be antisymmetric. Properly symmetrized wave functions may be readily con-... 

We may express the single-particle wave function tpniqd fhe product of a spatial wave function 0n(r,) and a spin function % i). For a fermion with spin such as an electron, there are just two spin states, which we designate by a(i) for m = and f i) for Therefore, for two particles there are three... 

These four antisymmetric wave functions are normalized if the single-particle spatial wave functions singlet state occurs... 

A simple product 5 = XiC i) X2( 2) XiC i) 3Cj( j)-"Xn( n) 15 not acceptable as a model wave function for fermions because it assigns a particular one-electron function to a particular electron (for example X to X]) and hence violates the fact that electrons are indistinguishable. In addition,... 

However, billiard balls are a pretty bad model for electrons. First of all, as discussed above, electrons are fermions and therefore have an antisymmetric wave function. Second, they are charged particles and interact through the Coulomb repulsion they try to stay away from each other as much as possible. Both of these properties heavily influence the pair density and we will now enter an in-depth discussion of these effects. Let us begin with an exposition of the consequences of the antisymmetry of the wave function. This is most easily done if we introduce the concept of the reduced density matrix for two electrons, which we call y2. This is a simple generalization of p2(x1 x2) given above according to... 

To understand how Kohn and Sham tackled this problem, we go back to the discussion of the Hartree-Fock scheme in Chapter 1. There, our wave function was a single Slater determinant SD constructed from N spin orbitals. While the Slater determinant enters the HF method as the approximation to the true N-electron wave function, we showed in Section 1.3 that 4>sd can also be looked upon as the exact wave function of a fictitious system of N non-interacting electrons (that is electrons which behave as uncharged fermions and therefore do not interact with each other via Coulomb repulsion), moving in the elfective potential VHF. For this type of wave function the kinetic energy can be exactly expressed as... 

The next step is crucial. We have shown above that the exact wave functions of noninteracting fermions are Slater determinants.12 Thus, it will be possible to set up a noninteracting reference system, with a Hamiltonian in which we have introduced an effective, local potential Vs(r) ... 

Let us explore first the nature of the integrand E cl for the limiting cases. At X = 0 we are dealing with an interaction free system, and the only component which is not included in the classical term is due to the antisymmetry of the fermion wave function. Thus, E j° is composed of exchange only, there is no correlation whatsoever.19 Hence, the X = 0 limit of the integral in equation (6-25) simply corresponds to the exchange contribution of a Slater determinant, as for example, expressed through equation (5-18). Remember, that E ° can... 

The requirement that electrons (and fermions in general) have antisymmetric many-particle wave functions is called the Pauli principle, which can be stated as follows ... 

The fact that every state may be occupied by several particles shows that the second quantization particles are bosons. However, in terms of different commutation relations an equivalent scheme may be obtained for fermions. To achieve this objective the wave functions are written in decomposed form as before ... 

Particles whose creation and annihilation operators satisfy these relationships are called fermions. It is found that [119] these commutation relations lead to wave functions in space that are antisymmetric. 

Consider a fermion collection, where each state is either empty or occupied, i.e., n total wave function can be expressed in terms of the state occupancy (Davydov 1991), namely,... 

Let us now define a creation operator, c , such that, if nk = 0, its operation will yield a wave function with nk = 1 and, if nk = 1 already, its operation will give zero, since a fermion can not be created in a state that is occupied. Hence, we have... 

Similarly, we define the hermitean conjugate operator, ck, as an annihilation operator, which produces a wave function with a fermion missing from the fcth state, if it was occupied, or zero, if not. Thus, in this case, we have... 

Let us now consider a simple example four noninteracting fermions in a onedimensional box, x e [0, 7r], The wave function is a Slater determinant with two doubly occupied orbitals ... 

The effect of thermal pion fluctuations on the specific heat and the neutrino emissivity of neutron stars was discussed in [27, 28] together with other in-medium effects, see also reviews [29, 30], Neutron pair breaking and formation (PBF) neutrino process on the neutral current was studied in [31, 32] for the hadron matter. Also ref. [32] added the proton PBF process in the hadron matter and correlation processes, and ref. [33] included quark PBF processes in quark matter. PBF processes were studied by two different methods with the help of Bogolubov transformation for the fermion wave function [31, 33] and within Schwinger-Kadanoff-Baym-Keldysh formalism for nonequilibrium normal and anomalous fermion Green functions [32, 28, 29],... 

Since the quark is a fermion with an atomic weight somewhere between 0.5 and 10, its adduct with an electron, the simplest quarkonium species, is essentially an isotopic substitution of a hydrogen atom having the solutions of the Schrodinger equation as wave-functions. 

We must now combine the nuclear wave functions with the rest of the molecular wave function to generate a total wave function which is antisymmetric with respect to exchange of Fermions. For Bosons the total wave function must be symmetric. To do so we write r]r = i rans r]rviB rot r Nuc-spiN and recognize that both the vibrational and translational wave functions are symmetric. Rotational wave functions... 

An important difference between the BO and non-BO internal Hamiltonians is that the former describes only the motion of electrons in the stationary field of nuclei positioned in fixed points in space (represented by point charges) while the latter describes the coupled motion of both nuclei and electrons. In the conventional molecular BO calculations, one typically uses atom-centered basis functions (in most calculations one-electron atomic orbitals) to expand the electronic wave function. The fermionic nature of the electrons dictates that such a function has to be antisymmetric with respect to the permutation of the labels of the electrons. In some high-precision BO calculations the wave function is expanded in terms of basis functions that explicitly depend on the interelectronic distances (so-called explicitly correlated functions). Such... 

---