Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Function electron microscopy

The source requited for aes is an electron gun similar to that described above for electron microscopy. The most common electron source is thermionic in nature with a W filament which is heated to cause electrons to overcome its work function. The electron flux in these sources is generally proportional to the square of the temperature. Thermionic electron guns are routinely used, because they ate robust and tehable. An alternative choice of electron gun is the field emission source which uses a large electric field to overcome the work function barrier. Field emission sources ate typically of higher brightness than the thermionic sources, because the electron emission is concentrated to the small area of the field emission tip. Focusing in both of these sources is done by electrostatic lenses. Today s thermionic sources typically produce spot sizes on the order of 0.2—0.5 p.m with beam currents of 10 A at 10 keV. If field emission sources ate used, spot sizes down to ca 10—50 nm can be achieved. [Pg.283]

Perhaps the most significant complication in the interpretation of nanoscale adhesion and mechanical properties measurements is the fact that the contact sizes are below the optical limit ( 1 t,im). Macroscopic adhesion studies and mechanical property measurements often rely on optical observations of the contact, and many of the contact mechanics models are formulated around direct measurement of the contact area or radius as a function of experimentally controlled parameters, such as load or displacement. In studies of colloids, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) has been used to view particle/surface contact sizes from the side to measure contact radius [3]. However, such a configuration is not easily employed in AFM and nanoindentation studies, and undesirable surface interactions from charging or contamination may arise. For adhesion studies (e.g. Johnson-Kendall-Roberts (JKR) [4] and probe-tack tests [5,6]), the probe/sample contact area is monitored as a function of load or displacement. This allows evaluation of load/area or even stress/strain response [7] as well as comparison to and development of contact mechanics theories. Area measurements are also important in traditional indentation experiments, where hardness is determined by measuring the residual contact area of the deformation optically [8J. For micro- and nanoscale studies, the dimensions of both the contact and residual deformation (if any) are below the optical limit. [Pg.194]

The interface properties can usually be independently measured by a number of spectroscopic and surface analysis techniques such as secondary ion mass spectroscopy (SIMS), X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), specular neutron reflection (SNR), forward recoil spectroscopy (FRES), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM), infrared (IR) and several other methods. Theoretical and computer simulation methods can also be used to evaluate H t). Thus, we assume for each interface that we have the ability to measure H t) at different times and that the function is well defined in terms of microscopic properties. [Pg.354]

Reactive compatibilization of engineering thermoplastic PET with PP through functionalization has been reported by Xanthos et al. [57]. Acrylic acid modified PP was used for compatibilization. Additives such as magnesium acetate and p-toluene sulfonic acid were evaluated as the catalyst for the potential interchange or esterification reaction that could occur in the melt. The blend characterization through scanning electron microscopy, IR spectroscopy, differential scanning calorimetry, and... [Pg.673]

Many years have passed since the early days of AFM, when adhesion was seen as a hindrance, and it is now regarded as a useful parameter for identification of material as well as a key to understanding many important processes in biological function. In this area, the ability of AFM to map spatial variations of adhesion has not yet been fully exploited but in future could prove to be particularly useful. At present, the chemical nature and interaction area of the AFM probe are still rarely characterized to a desirable level. This may be improved dramatically by the use of nanotubes, carbon or otherwise, with functionalized end groups. However, reliance on other measurement techniques, such as transmission electron microscopy and field ion microscopy, will probably be essential in order to fully evaluate the tip-sample systems under investigation. [Pg.56]

While the fluid mosaic model of membrane stmcture has stood up well to detailed scrutiny, additional features of membrane structure and function are constantly emerging. Two structures of particular current interest, located in surface membranes, are tipid rafts and caveolae. The former are dynamic areas of the exo-plasmic leaflet of the lipid bilayer enriched in cholesterol and sphingolipids they are involved in signal transduction and possibly other processes. Caveolae may derive from lipid rafts. Many if not all of them contain the protein caveolin-1, which may be involved in their formation from rafts. Caveolae are observable by electron microscopy as flask-shaped indentations of the cell membrane. Proteins detected in caveolae include various components of the signal-transduction system (eg, the insutin receptor and some G proteins), the folate receptor, and endothetial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS). Caveolae and lipid rafts are active areas of research, and ideas concerning them and their possible roles in various diseases are rapidly evolving. [Pg.422]

Another condition due to mutations in the RYRl gene is central core disease. This is a rare myopathy presenting in infancy with hypotonia and proximal muscle weakness. Electron microscopy reveals an absence of mitochondria in the center of many type I (see below) muscle fibers. Damage to mitochondria induced by high intracellular levels of Ca secondary to abnormal functioning of RYRl appears to be responsible for the morphologic findings. [Pg.565]

Fig. 4 Osmium clusters supported on MgO(OOl) a OssC/MgisOs and b OS5C at a surface point Vs defect site [33] these were represented by density functional theory, and the samples were characterized by EXAFS spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and other techniques [15]... Fig. 4 Osmium clusters supported on MgO(OOl) a OssC/MgisOs and b OS5C at a surface point Vs defect site [33] these were represented by density functional theory, and the samples were characterized by EXAFS spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, and other techniques [15]...

See other pages where Function electron microscopy is mentioned: [Pg.220]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.2819]    [Pg.2912]    [Pg.237]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.312]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.260]    [Pg.572]    [Pg.690]    [Pg.1124]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.554]    [Pg.87]    [Pg.51]    [Pg.423]    [Pg.541]    [Pg.544]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.210]    [Pg.469]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.78]    [Pg.183]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.202]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.405 , Pg.422 ]




SEARCH



Electron functionalization

© 2024 chempedia.info